<strong>Adaptation</strong> <strong>and</strong> Mitigation 103By initiating coastal adaptation planning, government agencies <strong>and</strong> local communitiesare educating themselves <strong>and</strong> others while building networks to share that knowledgeamong researchers, decision makers, <strong>and</strong> community members. One of the areas inwhich adaptation planning has been instrumental in exp<strong>and</strong>ing knowledge has been inthe assessment of vulnerabilities <strong>and</strong> risks associated with climate change. For example,the Partnership for the Delaware Estuary undertook a series of case studies to examinethe estuary’s vulnerability to climate change (Kreeger et al., 2011). Meanwhile, the Stateof New Jersey assessed the potential impacts of sea-level rise <strong>and</strong> coastal inundationfor the state’s coastline as well as the associated socio-economic impacts (Cooper et al.,2005). Similar assessments have been conducted for individual municipalities includingthe City of New York <strong>and</strong> the City of Punta Gorda, Florida (Beever et al., 2009; New YourCity Panel on <strong>Climate</strong> Change, 2010, also see Box 4.1).Assessments of vulnerability <strong>and</strong> risk are also emerging from individual utilities <strong>and</strong>infrastructure managers. For example, as part of its adaptation planning, the City ofNew York’s Metropolitan Transit Authority assessed the potential impacts of climatechange to the agency’s infrastructure <strong>and</strong> operations (Jacob et al., 2008). Meanwhile,King County, Washington assessed the implications of sea-level rise for waste-watermanagement infrastructure (King County, 2008). Although the goals of adaptation planningare broader than a simple assessment of potential vulnerabilities <strong>and</strong> risks associatedwith climate change, such assessment activities are a key entry point for adaptationplanning. Accordingly, researchers <strong>and</strong> practitioners have contributed to the expansionof methods <strong>and</strong> tools for assessing coastal risk (also see Section 5.3).Emerging Planning PracticeAs adaptation planning has evolved, recognition has grown regarding the need for detailedinformation that is compatible with organizational decision-making processes<strong>and</strong> management systems. In recent years, progress has been made in the integration ofadaptation into spatial planning at the state, regional, <strong>and</strong> local levels. This has allowedadaptation planning to advance beyond the identification of potential policies <strong>and</strong> optionsto more practical explorations of those options at spatial scales relevant to decisionmakers; for example, Miami/Dade County has developed a series of spatial flood-risk<strong>and</strong> sea-level-rise visualizations. Increasingly, spatial planning is integrating informationon coastal risk with l<strong>and</strong>-use planning; for example, regional planning agencies inPennsylvania (Linn, 2010), Georgia (Concannon et al., 2010), <strong>and</strong> Florida (Merritt, 2010)have collaborated with local governments to create maps depicting which l<strong>and</strong>s are likelyto receive shore protection <strong>and</strong> which l<strong>and</strong>s would be given up to the rising sea. TheNOAA Sea Grant programs have conducted similar efforts in New York (Tanski, 2010)<strong>and</strong> North Carolina (Clark & Kassakian, 2010). A spatial planning exercise conductedby the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) in Cape Cod, Massachusetts exploredmultiple scenarios of future development on the cape to explore interactionsamong coastal vulnerability, development, <strong>and</strong> maintenance of environmental amenity(U.S. DOT, 2011). Integrated approaches to spatial planning have also been applied inthe cities of Punta Gorda, Florida (Beever et al., 2009); New York, New York (New YorkCity Panel on <strong>Climate</strong> Change, 2010); <strong>and</strong> Boston, Massachusetts (<strong>Adaptation</strong> AdvisoryCommittee, 2011).
104 <strong>Coastal</strong> <strong>Impacts</strong>, <strong>Adaptation</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Vulnerabilities</strong>The aforementioned Cape Cod study highlights another advance in adaptation planning:the expansion of collaborative networks <strong>and</strong> stakeholder participation in the planningprocess. Robust adaptation planning necessitates both expert knowledge regardingbiophysical climate change impacts <strong>and</strong> regional <strong>and</strong> local knowledge regarding howthose changes might impact valued human <strong>and</strong> ecological systems <strong>and</strong> the range ofrelevant policy responses. <strong>Adaptation</strong> planning is therefore increasingly undertakenthrough partnerships among federal, state, <strong>and</strong> local government agencies, research institutions,<strong>and</strong> non-profit organizations. Such partnerships have facilitated knowledgetransfers <strong>and</strong> supported adaptation planning efforts in Oregon (State of Oregon, 2010)<strong>and</strong> California (California Natural Resources Agency, 2009) as well as the cities of NewYork (New York City Panel on <strong>Climate</strong> Change, 2010) <strong>and</strong> Boston (<strong>Adaptation</strong> AdvisoryCommittee, 2011). This has created greater opportunities for learning <strong>and</strong> enhanced thepractical utility of adaptation planning.<strong>Adaptation</strong> Planning ChallengesDespite the rapid expansion of coastal adaptation planning, challenges remain in translatingsuch planning efforts into increased coastal-systems resilience to the impacts ofclimate change (Berrang-Ford et al., 2011; Preston et al., 2011a). A central challenge isthe availability of knowledge <strong>and</strong> tools that enable confident planning for the future;for example, considerable uncertainty persists with respect to projections of future sealevelrise as well as information regarding future demographic <strong>and</strong> economic trajectories(Preston et al., 2011b, see also Section 2.2). Guidance on flexible decision pathways isneeded to assist decision makers with evaluating <strong>and</strong> staging adaptation decisions whilerecognizing that underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the future will always be imperfect. Constraints onfinancial <strong>and</strong> human resources within organizations may hinder attempts to managesuch uncertainties (Moser & Ekstrom, 2010). Developing strategies for overcoming suchconstraints is therefore an important but often overlooked component of adaptationplanning. In one constructive example, the City of Homer, Alaska intends to enact a sustainabilityfund to recruit staff <strong>and</strong> finance adaptation measures (City of Homer, 2011).The challenges in implementing adaptation plans extend beyond the resourcing oforganizations. Although many adaptation actions for coastal areas can be categorizedas “no regrets” actions that pose few opportunity costs (California Natural ResourcesAgency, 2009), more substantive actions may have larger policy or legal hurdles. Forexample, restrictions on development in vulnerable areas or the implementation ofplanned retreat may be challenged as regulatory “takings” that require just compensation(Craig, 2010), which may force tradeoffs between coastal protection <strong>and</strong> propertyrights. Overlapping <strong>and</strong> sometimes conflicting laws, often designed without considerationof a changing climate, can prevent the adoption of adaptive measures. In the AlligatorRiver National Wildlife Refuge/Albemarle-Pamlico Peninsula <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Adaptation</strong>Project, the Nature Conservancy <strong>and</strong> the U.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> Wildlife Service set out to evaluatethe effects of different adaptation strategies on areas likely to be impacted by sea-levelrise. The strategies included constructing oyster reefs to buffer shorelines from waves<strong>and</strong> storm surges, restoring the natural hydrologic regime <strong>and</strong> associated wetl<strong>and</strong> systems,<strong>and</strong> planting salt- <strong>and</strong> flood-tolerant species, several of which required federal <strong>and</strong>state permits. The permit required through the state’s <strong>Coastal</strong> Area Management Act
- Page 1:
National Climate Assessment Regiona
- Page 5 and 6:
© 2012 The National Oceanic and At
- Page 8:
Coastal Impacts, Adaptation,and Vul
- Page 11 and 12:
Chapter 3Lead Author: Carlton H. He
- Page 16 and 17:
ContentsKey TermsAcronymsCommunicat
- Page 18 and 19:
4.4 Human Health Impacts and Implic
- Page 20 and 21:
Key TermsxixExposure 3 - The nature
- Page 22 and 23:
AcronymsxxiNAO - North Atlantic Osc
- Page 26 and 27:
Executive Summaryxxvffffffffffffffo
- Page 28 and 29:
Executive Summaryxxviiweakened by v
- Page 30 and 31:
Executive SummaryxxixAdaptation and
- Page 34:
Introduction and Context 3irrigatio
- Page 40 and 41:
Introduction and Context 9coastal w
- Page 42 and 43:
Physical Climate Forces 11fffffffff
- Page 44 and 45:
Physical Climate Forces 13Figure 2-
- Page 46 and 47:
Physical Climate Forces 15Sea-level
- Page 48 and 49:
Physical Climate Forces 17maintain
- Page 50 and 51:
Physical Climate Forces 19These low
- Page 52 and 53:
Physical Climate Forces 21Figure 2-
- Page 54 and 55:
Physical Climate Forces 23that surv
- Page 56 and 57:
Physical Climate Forces 25Table 2-2
- Page 58 and 59:
Physical Climate Forces 27Most of t
- Page 60 and 61:
Physical Climate Forces 29(low to m
- Page 62 and 63:
Physical Climate Forces 31A number
- Page 64 and 65:
Physical Climate Forces 33off the c
- Page 66 and 67:
Physical Climate Forces 35in these
- Page 68 and 69:
Physical Climate Forces 37this diff
- Page 70 and 71:
Physical Climate Forces 39in input
- Page 72 and 73:
Physical Climate Forces 41Intensifi
- Page 74 and 75:
Physical Climate Forces 43depth qua
- Page 76 and 77:
Physical Climate Forces 45precipita
- Page 78 and 79:
Physical Climate Forces 47Sea and w
- Page 80 and 81:
Physical Climate Forces 49by sea ic
- Page 82 and 83:
Physical Climate Forces 51niche ero
- Page 84 and 85: Vulnerability and Impacts on Natura
- Page 86 and 87: Vulnerability and Impacts on Natura
- Page 88 and 89: Vulnerability and Impacts on Natura
- Page 90 and 91: Vulnerability and Impacts on Natura
- Page 92 and 93: Vulnerability and Impacts on Natura
- Page 94 and 95: Vulnerability and Impacts on Natura
- Page 96 and 97: Vulnerability and Impacts on Natura
- Page 98 and 99: Vulnerability and Impacts on Human
- Page 100 and 101: Vulnerability and Impacts on Human
- Page 103 and 104: 72 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 105 and 106: 74 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 107 and 108: 76 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 109 and 110: 78 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 111 and 112: 80 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 113 and 114: 82 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 115 and 116: 84 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 117 and 118: 86 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 119 and 120: 88 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 121 and 122: 90 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 123 and 124: 92 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 125 and 126: 94 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 127 and 128: 96 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 129 and 130: Chapter 5Adaptation and MitigationK
- Page 131 and 132: 100 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 133: 102 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 137 and 138: 106 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 139 and 140: 108 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 141 and 142: 110 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 143 and 144: 112 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 145 and 146: 114 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 147 and 148: 116 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 149 and 150: 118 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 151 and 152: 120 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 153 and 154: 122 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 155 and 156: 124 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 157 and 158: 126 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 159 and 160: 128 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 161 and 162: 130 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 163 and 164: 132 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 165 and 166: 134 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 167 and 168: 136 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 169 and 170: 138 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 171 and 172: 140 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 173 and 174: 142 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 175 and 176: ReferencesAbuodha, P. & Woodroffe,
- Page 177 and 178: 146 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 179 and 180: 148 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 181 and 182: 150 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 183 and 184: 152 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 185 and 186:
154 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 187 and 188:
156 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 189 and 190:
158 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 191 and 192:
160 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 193 and 194:
162 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 195 and 196:
164 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 197 and 198:
166 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 199 and 200:
168 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 201 and 202:
170 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 203 and 204:
172 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 205 and 206:
174 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 207 and 208:
176 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 209 and 210:
178 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 211 and 212:
180 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 213 and 214:
182 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 215 and 216:
184 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 217:
Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and Vu