10.07.2015 Views

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RPS Energy<strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Oil</strong> – Competent Persons ReportGiven <strong>the</strong> range of <strong>re</strong>sources in <strong>the</strong> Albert Basin, <strong>the</strong> gross risked <strong>re</strong>coverable Contingent and Prospective<strong>re</strong>sources have been consolidated s<strong>to</strong>chastically and <strong>the</strong> p90, p50, p10 and mean is quoted in Table 24and p<strong>re</strong>sented graphically in Figu<strong>re</strong> 29.Gross Risked Recoverable Resources (MMstb)p90 p50 p10 Mean280 793 1,731 923Table 24:Consolidation of Gross Risked Recoverable Resources in Blocks 1 and 3A Reviewed by RPSTotal Risked Recoverable Resources120%100%Cumulative exceedance probability80%60%40%20%Figu<strong>re</strong> 29:0%0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000Gross risked <strong>re</strong>coverable <strong>re</strong>sources22FEB200803434111Consolidation of Gross Risked Recoverable Resources in Blocks 1 and 3A Reviewed by RPS (MMstb)5.6. O<strong>the</strong>r ProspectivityIn an effort <strong>to</strong> obtain a full valuation of <strong>the</strong> potential prospectivity of all of <strong>the</strong>ir ac<strong>re</strong>age in Uganda and <strong>to</strong>plan futu<strong>re</strong> exploration strategies, <strong>Heritage</strong> made estimates of <strong>the</strong> potential that <strong>the</strong> under-explo<strong>re</strong>d a<strong>re</strong>asmay offer. This was beyond <strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>the</strong> RPS evaluation. <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>re</strong>cognises conceptual leads in a<strong>re</strong>asbeyond seismic control. These conceptual leads a<strong>re</strong> based on <strong>Heritage</strong>’s extensive <strong>re</strong>gional and structuralknowledge of <strong>the</strong> a<strong>re</strong>a <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r with evidence gleaned from satellite imagery.<strong>Heritage</strong> advises that a conceptual lead E, p<strong>re</strong>viously carried in <strong>the</strong>ir prospect inven<strong>to</strong>ry, was postulated <strong>to</strong>be p<strong>re</strong>sent in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part of Block 1. This a<strong>re</strong>a has since been cove<strong>re</strong>d by seismic data which <strong>re</strong>sultedin <strong>the</strong> identification of <strong>the</strong> Buffalo prospect in <strong>the</strong> location of conceptual structu<strong>re</strong> E, as well as th<strong>re</strong>eadditional prospects being mapped using <strong>the</strong> new seismic data in that vicinity. <strong>Heritage</strong>’s estimated meanSTOIIP for conceptual structu<strong>re</strong> E was 804 million bar<strong>re</strong>ls.This has been <strong>re</strong>placed by four prospects carrying a mean unrisked STOIIP (100 per cent. basis) in excessof 2 billion bar<strong>re</strong>ls, as estimated by RPS.At <strong>the</strong> time of this <strong>re</strong>port, <strong>Heritage</strong> carry th<strong>re</strong>e conceptual leads in <strong>the</strong>ir portfolio: two of which a<strong>re</strong> locatedin <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn part of Block 1 and one in <strong>the</strong> south-western ext<strong>re</strong>mity of Block 3A. The prospective<strong>re</strong>sources calculated by <strong>Heritage</strong> for <strong>the</strong>se th<strong>re</strong>e structu<strong>re</strong>s a<strong>re</strong> in Table 25:113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!