10.07.2015 Views

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. Changes in accounting policies:(a) Asset <strong>re</strong>ti<strong>re</strong>ment obligations:Effective January 1, 2004, <strong>the</strong> Corporation adopted a new Canadian accounting standard forasset <strong>re</strong>ti<strong>re</strong>ment obligations. This standard focuses on <strong>the</strong> <strong>re</strong>cognition and measu<strong>re</strong>ment ofliabilities <strong>re</strong>lated <strong>to</strong> legal obligations associated with <strong>the</strong> futu<strong>re</strong> <strong>re</strong>ti<strong>re</strong>ment of property, plant andequipment. Under this standard, <strong>the</strong>se obligations a<strong>re</strong> initially measu<strong>re</strong>d at fair value determinedas <strong>the</strong> estimated futu<strong>re</strong> costs discounted <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> p<strong>re</strong>sent value and subsequently adjusted for <strong>the</strong>acc<strong>re</strong>tion of <strong>the</strong> discount fac<strong>to</strong>r and any changes in <strong>the</strong> underlying cash flows. The asset<strong>re</strong>ti<strong>re</strong>ment cost is capitalized <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>re</strong>lated asset and amortized in<strong>to</strong> earnings over time. Theeffect of adoption of <strong>the</strong> new standard on <strong>the</strong> financial statements is disclosed in note 5.Prior <strong>to</strong> January 1, 2004, an estimate of futu<strong>re</strong> abandonment and <strong>re</strong>s<strong>to</strong>ration costs was providedfor using <strong>the</strong> unit of production method over estimated gross proved <strong>re</strong>serves.(b) Full cost ceiling test:Effective January 1, 2004, <strong>the</strong> Corporation adopted a new Canadian guideline on <strong>the</strong> applicationof full cost accounting, described in note 1(e). The guideline modifies how impairment is tested.Prior <strong>to</strong> January 1, 2004, an impairment loss was <strong>re</strong>cognized when <strong>the</strong> carrying amount of a costcent<strong>re</strong> exceeded its <strong>re</strong>coverable amount. The <strong>re</strong>coverable amount was <strong>the</strong> sum of <strong>the</strong>undiscounted cash flows expected from <strong>the</strong> production of proved <strong>re</strong>serves plus <strong>the</strong> lower of cos<strong>to</strong>r market of unproved inte<strong>re</strong>sts less estimated futu<strong>re</strong> costs for administration, financing and site<strong>re</strong>s<strong>to</strong>ration. The cash flows we<strong>re</strong> estimated using period end prices and costs.Adoption of <strong>the</strong> new guideline had no effect on <strong>the</strong> Corporation’s financial statements.(c)S<strong>to</strong>ck-based compensation:Effective January 1, 2004, <strong>the</strong> Corporation <strong>re</strong>troactively adopted <strong>the</strong> <strong>re</strong>vised Canadian accountingstandard for s<strong>to</strong>ck-based compensation and o<strong>the</strong>r s<strong>to</strong>ck-based payments described in note 1(l),without <strong>re</strong>statement of prior periods.Prior <strong>to</strong> January 1, 2004, no compensation cost was <strong>re</strong>corded for s<strong>to</strong>ck options granted <strong>to</strong>employees and di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>rs. The Corporation p<strong>re</strong>viously disclosed <strong>the</strong> pro forma effect ofaccounting for <strong>the</strong>se awards under <strong>the</strong> fair value based method.The effect of adoption of <strong>the</strong> <strong>re</strong>vised standard on <strong>the</strong> financial statements is disclosed innote 6(g).3. Property and equipment:2005 2004$ $Petroleum and natural gas inte<strong>re</strong>sts and equipment ............... 73,159,179 54,514,733Drilling equipment ...................................... 2,693,618 2,055,006Building .............................................. 11,984,701 11,984,701O<strong>the</strong>r ................................................ 931,289 297,69288,768,787 68,852,132Accumulated depletion and dep<strong>re</strong>ciation ....................... (16,385,852) (14,769,035)72,382,935 54,083,097230

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!