10.07.2015 Views

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In 2005, <strong>the</strong> Group capitalised $1,332,363 (2004—$441,075) of general and administrative costs <strong>re</strong>lating <strong>to</strong>exploration and development activities.7.8 Finance CostsInte<strong>re</strong>st on <strong>the</strong> loan used <strong>to</strong> <strong>re</strong>-finance <strong>the</strong> purchase of <strong>the</strong> technical services office in London <strong>to</strong>talled$491,824 in 2005. This loan was obtained in January 2005. The<strong>re</strong> was no inte<strong>re</strong>st charge in 2004 as HOCwas debt f<strong>re</strong>e throughout that year.7.9 Fo<strong>re</strong>ign Exchange LossesThe<strong>re</strong> was a fo<strong>re</strong>ign exchange loss of $1,240,529 in 2005, primarily as a <strong>re</strong>sult of <strong>the</strong> <strong>re</strong>lative weakening of<strong>the</strong> Euro against <strong>the</strong> U.S. dollar. A $14 million note <strong>re</strong>ceivable (denominated in Euros) was <strong>re</strong>paid during<strong>the</strong> first quarter of 2005 and <strong>the</strong> funds we<strong>re</strong> <strong>re</strong>tained in Euro-denominated t<strong>re</strong>asury deposits for part ofthis period.7.10 Depletion, Dep<strong>re</strong>ciation and Acc<strong>re</strong>tionDepletion, dep<strong>re</strong>ciation and acc<strong>re</strong>tion expenses inc<strong>re</strong>ased by $1,002,365 <strong>to</strong> $1,636,008 in 2005. This wasprimarily as a <strong>re</strong>sult of a dec<strong>re</strong>ase in <strong>the</strong> level of proved <strong>re</strong>serves in <strong>the</strong> Kouakouala field in <strong>the</strong> Congo as at31 December 2005, which impacted on <strong>the</strong> depletion, dep<strong>re</strong>ciation and acc<strong>re</strong>tion expense in <strong>the</strong> fourthquarter of <strong>the</strong> year.The depletion calculation included futu<strong>re</strong> costs <strong>re</strong>qui<strong>re</strong>d <strong>to</strong> develop <strong>re</strong>serves in <strong>the</strong> amount of $625,000 in2005 compa<strong>re</strong>d <strong>to</strong> $3 million in 2004.7.11 Impairment of Unproved Petroleum and Natural Gas Inte<strong>re</strong>stsThe<strong>re</strong> was an impairment of unproved inte<strong>re</strong>sts of $724,915 (Nigeria and Turkmenistan) in 2005 and$934,771 in 2004.7.12 Gain on Sale of Property and EquipmentOn 9 June 2004, <strong>the</strong> Group sold a call option <strong>to</strong> Mau<strong>re</strong>l et Prom for proceeds of $1.2 million entitling <strong>the</strong>purchaser <strong>to</strong> acqui<strong>re</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group’s overriding royalty inte<strong>re</strong>st in <strong>the</strong> Congo by 30 July 2004 for cash proceedsof $16.4 million, a loan note <strong>re</strong>ceivable equivalent <strong>to</strong> $14 million (denominated in Euros of approximatelyA11.6 million) due on 31 December 2005 bearing inte<strong>re</strong>st at Euribor plus 2.65 per cent. per annum,<strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r with contingent consideration of up <strong>to</strong> A8.3 million, payable on <strong>the</strong> sale of all or a portion of itsinte<strong>re</strong>st in <strong>the</strong> M’Boundi field or Kouilou permit befo<strong>re</strong> 31 December 2005. Concur<strong>re</strong>nt with <strong>the</strong> exerciseof <strong>the</strong> option, <strong>the</strong> Group was <strong>re</strong>qui<strong>re</strong>d <strong>to</strong> acqui<strong>re</strong> a 7 per cent. working inte<strong>re</strong>st in <strong>the</strong> Noumbi permit in <strong>the</strong>Congo from <strong>the</strong> purchaser for a cash consideration of $7 million.On 30 June 2004, Mau<strong>re</strong>l et Prom exercised <strong>the</strong> option, <strong>re</strong>sulting in a gain on sale of $26,269,113(Cdn$35,339,838). The net cash consideration of $9.4 million was <strong>re</strong>ceived in July 2004. The gain on <strong>the</strong>sale of <strong>the</strong> Kouilou overriding royalty was calculated after taking in<strong>to</strong> account all <strong>re</strong>levant costs. The sale of<strong>the</strong> overriding royalty would have changed <strong>the</strong> rate of depletion and dep<strong>re</strong>ciation for <strong>the</strong> Congo by mo<strong>re</strong>than 20 per cent. Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> capitalised cost pools and project values of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r projects from thiscountry we<strong>re</strong> taken in<strong>to</strong> account when calculating <strong>the</strong> gain on sale of $26,269,113.7.13 Net Earnings (Loss) for <strong>the</strong> YearThe<strong>re</strong> was a net loss of $3,799,813 in 2005, compa<strong>re</strong>d <strong>to</strong> net earnings of $28,364,368 in 2004. Net earningsin 2004 we<strong>re</strong> $2,095,255 befo<strong>re</strong> taking in<strong>to</strong> account <strong>the</strong> one-off gain on <strong>the</strong> sale of property of $26,269,113.If fo<strong>re</strong>ign exchange gains and losses and write-downs of petroleum and natural gas inte<strong>re</strong>sts we<strong>re</strong> excluded,<strong>the</strong> loss in 2005 would have been $1,834,369, compa<strong>re</strong>d <strong>to</strong> earnings of $1,542,000 in <strong>the</strong> p<strong>re</strong>vious year.Net losses per HOC Common Sha<strong>re</strong> we<strong>re</strong> $0.18 in 2005, compa<strong>re</strong>d <strong>to</strong> earnings per HOC Common Sha<strong>re</strong>of $1.33 (basic) and $1.31 (diluted) in 2004.154

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!