10.07.2015 Views

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(d) Reversal of impairmentUnder IFRS, impairment losses p<strong>re</strong>viously <strong>re</strong>corded a<strong>re</strong> <strong>re</strong>versed if <strong>the</strong> conditions giving rise <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>impairment have <strong>re</strong>versed. The <strong>re</strong>versal of impairment losses was not permitted under Canadian GAAP.The impact on adoption of IFRS at 1 January 2005 is an inc<strong>re</strong>ase in inven<strong>to</strong>ry of $24,976, an inc<strong>re</strong>ase inproperty, plant and equipment of $1,656,846, and an inc<strong>re</strong>ase in <strong>re</strong>tained earnings of $1,681,822.At 31 December 2005, this has <strong>re</strong>sulted in inc<strong>re</strong>ases in inven<strong>to</strong>ry of $35,441, property, plant and equipmen<strong>to</strong>f $1,442,748, <strong>re</strong>tained earnings of $1,478,189, and depletion expense for <strong>the</strong> year of $203,633.(e) Sha<strong>re</strong>-based paymentsUnder Canadian GAAP, <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>re</strong>cognised an expense <strong>re</strong>lated <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir sha<strong>re</strong>-based payments on astraight-line basis through <strong>the</strong> date of full vesting. Under IFRS, <strong>the</strong> Group is <strong>re</strong>qui<strong>re</strong>d <strong>to</strong> <strong>re</strong>cognise <strong>the</strong>expense over <strong>the</strong> individual vesting periods for <strong>the</strong> graded vesting awards.At 31 December 2005, this has <strong>re</strong>sulted in inc<strong>re</strong>ases in general and administrative expenses and sha<strong>re</strong>basedpayments <strong>re</strong>serves of $456,747, with a cor<strong>re</strong>sponding dec<strong>re</strong>ase in <strong>re</strong>tained earnings.(f) Defer<strong>re</strong>d taxUnder Canadian GAAP, <strong>the</strong> Corporation <strong>re</strong>cognised a defer<strong>re</strong>d tax liability and cor<strong>re</strong>sponding inc<strong>re</strong>ase inproperty, plant and equipment associated with its acquisition of Russian properties. However, under IFRSdefer<strong>re</strong>d tax is only <strong>re</strong>cognised on <strong>the</strong> initial <strong>re</strong>cognition of an asset if it is acqui<strong>re</strong>d through a businesscombination.At 31 December 2005 and 31 December 2006, this has <strong>re</strong>sulted in a <strong>re</strong>duction in property, plant andequipment and defer<strong>re</strong>d tax liability of $2,346,605. The<strong>re</strong> was no impact at 1 January 2005.(g) Depletion policyUpon transition <strong>to</strong> IFRS, <strong>the</strong> Corporation adopted a policy of depleting petroleum and natural gasinte<strong>re</strong>sts on a units of production basis over proved plus probable <strong>re</strong>serves. The depletion policy underCanadian GAAP was units of production over proved <strong>re</strong>serves.The impact on adoption <strong>to</strong> IFRS at 1 January 2005 is an inc<strong>re</strong>ase in property, plant and equipment and<strong>re</strong>tained earnings of $789,008. At 31 December 2005, this <strong>re</strong>sulted in inc<strong>re</strong>ases in property plant andequipment and <strong>re</strong>tained earnings of $743,642, and depletion expense for <strong>the</strong> year of $34,734, and adec<strong>re</strong>ase in earnings from discontinued operations of $10,632. At 31 December 2006, this <strong>re</strong>sulted indec<strong>re</strong>ases in property plant and equipment of $233,631, <strong>re</strong>tained earnings of $211,900, and earnings fromdiscontinued operations of $674,905, and inc<strong>re</strong>ases in inven<strong>to</strong>ry of $21,731, and depletion expense for <strong>the</strong>year of $280,637.12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONSNine-Month Period Ended 30 September 2007 P<strong>re</strong>pa<strong>re</strong>d in Accordance with IFRSDuring <strong>the</strong> nine-month period ended 30 September 2007, general and administrative expenses includedadvisory fees of $806,607 ($644,258 in <strong>the</strong> nine-month period ended 30 September 2006) charged byMr. Anthony Buckingham, a di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>r of HOC and CEO.Mr. Paul A<strong>the</strong>r<strong>to</strong>n, a di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>r of HOC, is also a di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>r and CFO of SeaDragon. The Group acqui<strong>re</strong>d605,000 common sha<strong>re</strong>s in SeaDragon on 9 March 2007 through <strong>the</strong> sale of its 65 per cent. inte<strong>re</strong>st inPipelay and Naturalay Technologies.Year Ended 31 December 2006 P<strong>re</strong>pa<strong>re</strong>d in Accordance with IFRSIn 2006, general and administrative expenses included an advisory fee of $1,494,317 charged byMr. Anthony Buckingham, a di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>r of HOC, who was appointed CEO on 6 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2006.Year Ended 31 December 2005 P<strong>re</strong>pa<strong>re</strong>d in Accordance with IFRSIn 2005, <strong>the</strong> Group established a management and finance office in Switzerland that <strong>re</strong>qui<strong>re</strong>d Mr. AnthonyBuckingham, a di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>r of HOC, <strong>to</strong> <strong>re</strong>locate and he <strong>re</strong>ceived a <strong>re</strong>location allowance of $275,918. In 2005,general and administrative expenses included an advisory fee of $877,686 charged by this di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>r.166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!