10.07.2015 Views

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(j)In Alberta, <strong>the</strong> principal jurisdiction in Canada in which HOC is a ‘‘<strong>re</strong>porting issuer’’(as defined under <strong>the</strong> provincial securities law), when any person (‘‘an offeror’’), exceptpursuant <strong>to</strong> a formal bid, acqui<strong>re</strong>s beneficial ownership of, or <strong>the</strong> power <strong>to</strong> exercise control ordisc<strong>re</strong>tion over, or securities convertible in<strong>to</strong>, voting or equity securities or any class of a<strong>re</strong>porting issuer that, <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r with such offeror’s securities would constitute 10 per cent. ormo<strong>re</strong> of <strong>the</strong> outstanding securities of that class, <strong>the</strong> offeror must immediately issue and file ap<strong>re</strong>ss <strong>re</strong>lease announcing <strong>the</strong> acquisition, and file a <strong>re</strong>port of such acquisition with <strong>the</strong>applicable securities <strong>re</strong>gula<strong>to</strong>ry authorities within two business days <strong>the</strong><strong>re</strong>after. Certaininstitutional inves<strong>to</strong>rs may elect an alternate <strong>re</strong>porting system. Once an offeror has filed such<strong>re</strong>port, <strong>the</strong> offeror is <strong>re</strong>qui<strong>re</strong>d <strong>to</strong> issue fur<strong>the</strong>r p<strong>re</strong>ss <strong>re</strong>leases and file fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>re</strong>ports each time<strong>the</strong> offeror, or any person acting jointly or in concert with <strong>the</strong> offeror, acqui<strong>re</strong>s beneficialownership of, or <strong>the</strong> power <strong>to</strong> exercise control or di<strong>re</strong>ction over, or securities convertible in<strong>to</strong>,an additional 2 per cent. or mo<strong>re</strong> of <strong>the</strong> outstanding securities of <strong>the</strong> applicable class.In Alberta, a takeover bid is generally defined as an offer <strong>to</strong> acqui<strong>re</strong> outstanding voting o<strong>re</strong>quity securities of a class made <strong>to</strong> any holder in Alberta of securities subject <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> offer <strong>to</strong>acqui<strong>re</strong>, if <strong>the</strong> securities subject <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> offer <strong>to</strong> acqui<strong>re</strong>, <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r with securities held by <strong>the</strong>offeror and any person acting in concert with <strong>the</strong> offeror, constitute in agg<strong>re</strong>gate 20 per cent. ormo<strong>re</strong> of <strong>the</strong> outstanding securities of that class of securities at <strong>the</strong> date of <strong>the</strong> offer <strong>to</strong> acqui<strong>re</strong>.Subject <strong>to</strong> limited exemptions, a takeover bid must be made <strong>to</strong> all holders of securities of <strong>the</strong>class that is subject <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> bid who a<strong>re</strong> in Alberta and must allow such security holders 35 days<strong>to</strong> deposit securities pursuant <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> bid. The offeror must deliver <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> security holders atakeover bid circular which describes <strong>the</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> takeover bid and <strong>the</strong> di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>rs of <strong>the</strong><strong>re</strong>porting issuer must deliver a di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>rs’ circular within fifteen days of <strong>the</strong> date of <strong>the</strong> bid,making a <strong>re</strong>commendation <strong>to</strong> security holders <strong>to</strong> accept or <strong>re</strong>ject <strong>the</strong> bid and <strong>the</strong> <strong>re</strong>asons for<strong>the</strong> <strong>re</strong>commendation or a statement that <strong>the</strong> di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>rs a<strong>re</strong> unable <strong>to</strong> make or a<strong>re</strong> not making a<strong>re</strong>commendation and <strong>the</strong> <strong>re</strong>asons why. Generally, an offeror may not enter in<strong>to</strong> a collateralag<strong>re</strong>ement, understanding or commitment that has <strong>the</strong> effect of providing a security holderwith consideration of g<strong>re</strong>ater value than that offe<strong>re</strong>d <strong>to</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r security holders of <strong>the</strong> same class.While individual provincial securities laws in Canada only <strong>re</strong>gulate offers <strong>to</strong> <strong>re</strong>sidents of thatprovince, <strong>the</strong> Canadian Securities Administra<strong>to</strong>rs have adopted a policy whe<strong>re</strong>by <strong>the</strong>y mayissue a cease trade order against a company if a takeover bid is not made <strong>to</strong> all Canadiansecurity holders. Sha<strong>re</strong>holders not <strong>re</strong>sident in Canada a<strong>re</strong> advised that <strong>the</strong> provincial securitieslaws in Canada may not apply in fo<strong>re</strong>ign jurisdictions. Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> availability of atakeover bid <strong>to</strong> Sha<strong>re</strong>holders <strong>re</strong>siding outside of Canada will be dependent on whe<strong>the</strong>r suchtakeover bid may be made <strong>to</strong> such non-Canadian Sha<strong>re</strong>holders pursuant <strong>to</strong> applicablelegislation of <strong>the</strong> jurisdiction in which <strong>the</strong> non-Canadian sha<strong>re</strong>holder <strong>re</strong>sides and <strong>the</strong> actions of<strong>the</strong> acquiring company.Under Alberta corporate law, whe<strong>re</strong> an offeror has successfully acqui<strong>re</strong>d 90 per cent. of <strong>the</strong>sha<strong>re</strong>s of a company (exclusive of those p<strong>re</strong>viously held by <strong>the</strong> offeror), <strong>the</strong> offeror may, withinfour months after making <strong>the</strong> offer <strong>to</strong> acqui<strong>re</strong> sha<strong>re</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> company, send written notice <strong>to</strong>any sha<strong>re</strong>holder who did not accept <strong>the</strong> offer compelling <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> sell <strong>the</strong>ir sha<strong>re</strong>s on <strong>the</strong> sameterms as contained in <strong>the</strong> original offer, subject <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> right of such sha<strong>re</strong>holder <strong>to</strong> makeapplication <strong>to</strong> court, in which case <strong>the</strong> court may set <strong>the</strong> price and terms of payment and makesuch o<strong>the</strong>r consequential orders and give such di<strong>re</strong>ctions as it deems appropriate.The<strong>re</strong> have been no public takeover bids by third parties in <strong>re</strong>spect of <strong>the</strong> Exchangeable Sha<strong>re</strong>ssince HOC’s last financial year and <strong>the</strong> cur<strong>re</strong>nt financial year.5. JERSEY COMPANY LAWThe<strong>re</strong> a<strong>re</strong> a number of material diffe<strong>re</strong>nces between <strong>the</strong> Companies Act and <strong>the</strong> Act which mayimpact upon <strong>the</strong> rights of holders of Ordinary Sha<strong>re</strong>s. Salient diffe<strong>re</strong>nces include (withoutlimitation) <strong>the</strong> following:(a) <strong>the</strong> Act does not confer statu<strong>to</strong>ry p<strong>re</strong>-emption rights on sha<strong>re</strong>holders <strong>re</strong>lating <strong>to</strong> newsha<strong>re</strong> issues. But <strong>the</strong> Articles do confer p<strong>re</strong>-emption rights on sha<strong>re</strong>holders <strong>re</strong>lating <strong>to</strong> newissues of Ordinary Sha<strong>re</strong>s;(b) <strong>the</strong> Act does not impose any <strong>re</strong>qui<strong>re</strong>ment for <strong>the</strong> di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> obtain <strong>the</strong> sanction of <strong>the</strong>sha<strong>re</strong>holders <strong>to</strong> issue and allot sha<strong>re</strong>s. But <strong>the</strong> Articles do impose <strong>re</strong>strictions on amounts that253

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!