Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil
Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil
Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
(j)In Alberta, <strong>the</strong> principal jurisdiction in Canada in which HOC is a ‘‘<strong>re</strong>porting issuer’’(as defined under <strong>the</strong> provincial securities law), when any person (‘‘an offeror’’), exceptpursuant <strong>to</strong> a formal bid, acqui<strong>re</strong>s beneficial ownership of, or <strong>the</strong> power <strong>to</strong> exercise control ordisc<strong>re</strong>tion over, or securities convertible in<strong>to</strong>, voting or equity securities or any class of a<strong>re</strong>porting issuer that, <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r with such offeror’s securities would constitute 10 per cent. ormo<strong>re</strong> of <strong>the</strong> outstanding securities of that class, <strong>the</strong> offeror must immediately issue and file ap<strong>re</strong>ss <strong>re</strong>lease announcing <strong>the</strong> acquisition, and file a <strong>re</strong>port of such acquisition with <strong>the</strong>applicable securities <strong>re</strong>gula<strong>to</strong>ry authorities within two business days <strong>the</strong><strong>re</strong>after. Certaininstitutional inves<strong>to</strong>rs may elect an alternate <strong>re</strong>porting system. Once an offeror has filed such<strong>re</strong>port, <strong>the</strong> offeror is <strong>re</strong>qui<strong>re</strong>d <strong>to</strong> issue fur<strong>the</strong>r p<strong>re</strong>ss <strong>re</strong>leases and file fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>re</strong>ports each time<strong>the</strong> offeror, or any person acting jointly or in concert with <strong>the</strong> offeror, acqui<strong>re</strong>s beneficialownership of, or <strong>the</strong> power <strong>to</strong> exercise control or di<strong>re</strong>ction over, or securities convertible in<strong>to</strong>,an additional 2 per cent. or mo<strong>re</strong> of <strong>the</strong> outstanding securities of <strong>the</strong> applicable class.In Alberta, a takeover bid is generally defined as an offer <strong>to</strong> acqui<strong>re</strong> outstanding voting o<strong>re</strong>quity securities of a class made <strong>to</strong> any holder in Alberta of securities subject <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> offer <strong>to</strong>acqui<strong>re</strong>, if <strong>the</strong> securities subject <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> offer <strong>to</strong> acqui<strong>re</strong>, <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r with securities held by <strong>the</strong>offeror and any person acting in concert with <strong>the</strong> offeror, constitute in agg<strong>re</strong>gate 20 per cent. ormo<strong>re</strong> of <strong>the</strong> outstanding securities of that class of securities at <strong>the</strong> date of <strong>the</strong> offer <strong>to</strong> acqui<strong>re</strong>.Subject <strong>to</strong> limited exemptions, a takeover bid must be made <strong>to</strong> all holders of securities of <strong>the</strong>class that is subject <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> bid who a<strong>re</strong> in Alberta and must allow such security holders 35 days<strong>to</strong> deposit securities pursuant <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> bid. The offeror must deliver <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> security holders atakeover bid circular which describes <strong>the</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> takeover bid and <strong>the</strong> di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>rs of <strong>the</strong><strong>re</strong>porting issuer must deliver a di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>rs’ circular within fifteen days of <strong>the</strong> date of <strong>the</strong> bid,making a <strong>re</strong>commendation <strong>to</strong> security holders <strong>to</strong> accept or <strong>re</strong>ject <strong>the</strong> bid and <strong>the</strong> <strong>re</strong>asons for<strong>the</strong> <strong>re</strong>commendation or a statement that <strong>the</strong> di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>rs a<strong>re</strong> unable <strong>to</strong> make or a<strong>re</strong> not making a<strong>re</strong>commendation and <strong>the</strong> <strong>re</strong>asons why. Generally, an offeror may not enter in<strong>to</strong> a collateralag<strong>re</strong>ement, understanding or commitment that has <strong>the</strong> effect of providing a security holderwith consideration of g<strong>re</strong>ater value than that offe<strong>re</strong>d <strong>to</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r security holders of <strong>the</strong> same class.While individual provincial securities laws in Canada only <strong>re</strong>gulate offers <strong>to</strong> <strong>re</strong>sidents of thatprovince, <strong>the</strong> Canadian Securities Administra<strong>to</strong>rs have adopted a policy whe<strong>re</strong>by <strong>the</strong>y mayissue a cease trade order against a company if a takeover bid is not made <strong>to</strong> all Canadiansecurity holders. Sha<strong>re</strong>holders not <strong>re</strong>sident in Canada a<strong>re</strong> advised that <strong>the</strong> provincial securitieslaws in Canada may not apply in fo<strong>re</strong>ign jurisdictions. Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> availability of atakeover bid <strong>to</strong> Sha<strong>re</strong>holders <strong>re</strong>siding outside of Canada will be dependent on whe<strong>the</strong>r suchtakeover bid may be made <strong>to</strong> such non-Canadian Sha<strong>re</strong>holders pursuant <strong>to</strong> applicablelegislation of <strong>the</strong> jurisdiction in which <strong>the</strong> non-Canadian sha<strong>re</strong>holder <strong>re</strong>sides and <strong>the</strong> actions of<strong>the</strong> acquiring company.Under Alberta corporate law, whe<strong>re</strong> an offeror has successfully acqui<strong>re</strong>d 90 per cent. of <strong>the</strong>sha<strong>re</strong>s of a company (exclusive of those p<strong>re</strong>viously held by <strong>the</strong> offeror), <strong>the</strong> offeror may, withinfour months after making <strong>the</strong> offer <strong>to</strong> acqui<strong>re</strong> sha<strong>re</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> company, send written notice <strong>to</strong>any sha<strong>re</strong>holder who did not accept <strong>the</strong> offer compelling <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> sell <strong>the</strong>ir sha<strong>re</strong>s on <strong>the</strong> sameterms as contained in <strong>the</strong> original offer, subject <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> right of such sha<strong>re</strong>holder <strong>to</strong> makeapplication <strong>to</strong> court, in which case <strong>the</strong> court may set <strong>the</strong> price and terms of payment and makesuch o<strong>the</strong>r consequential orders and give such di<strong>re</strong>ctions as it deems appropriate.The<strong>re</strong> have been no public takeover bids by third parties in <strong>re</strong>spect of <strong>the</strong> Exchangeable Sha<strong>re</strong>ssince HOC’s last financial year and <strong>the</strong> cur<strong>re</strong>nt financial year.5. JERSEY COMPANY LAWThe<strong>re</strong> a<strong>re</strong> a number of material diffe<strong>re</strong>nces between <strong>the</strong> Companies Act and <strong>the</strong> Act which mayimpact upon <strong>the</strong> rights of holders of Ordinary Sha<strong>re</strong>s. Salient diffe<strong>re</strong>nces include (withoutlimitation) <strong>the</strong> following:(a) <strong>the</strong> Act does not confer statu<strong>to</strong>ry p<strong>re</strong>-emption rights on sha<strong>re</strong>holders <strong>re</strong>lating <strong>to</strong> newsha<strong>re</strong> issues. But <strong>the</strong> Articles do confer p<strong>re</strong>-emption rights on sha<strong>re</strong>holders <strong>re</strong>lating <strong>to</strong> newissues of Ordinary Sha<strong>re</strong>s;(b) <strong>the</strong> Act does not impose any <strong>re</strong>qui<strong>re</strong>ment for <strong>the</strong> di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> obtain <strong>the</strong> sanction of <strong>the</strong>sha<strong>re</strong>holders <strong>to</strong> issue and allot sha<strong>re</strong>s. But <strong>the</strong> Articles do impose <strong>re</strong>strictions on amounts that253