10.07.2015 Views

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Notes <strong>to</strong> <strong>re</strong>conciliationsa) P<strong>re</strong>-licence costsUnder Canadian GAAP all costs incur<strong>re</strong>d prior <strong>to</strong> having obtained licence rights we<strong>re</strong> includedwithin property, plant and equipment. Under IFRS, such expenditu<strong>re</strong>s a<strong>re</strong> expensed as incur<strong>re</strong>d.The impact on adoption <strong>to</strong> IFRS at 1 January 2005 is a <strong>re</strong>duction in property, plant andequipment and <strong>re</strong>tained earnings of $2,162,301.At 31 December 2005, this adjustment has <strong>re</strong>sulted in a <strong>re</strong>duction in property, plant andequipment and <strong>re</strong>tained earnings of $5,954,797, an inc<strong>re</strong>ase in exploration expenditu<strong>re</strong> for <strong>the</strong>year of $4,517,411, and a dec<strong>re</strong>ase in <strong>the</strong> impairment of unproved petroleum and natural gasinte<strong>re</strong>sts <strong>re</strong>cognised in <strong>the</strong> year of $724,915. The income tax impact was in a fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>re</strong>duction ofproperty, plant, and equipment of $2,346,605 and a cor<strong>re</strong>sponding dec<strong>re</strong>ase in defer<strong>re</strong>d taxliability.At 31 December 2006, this adjustment has <strong>re</strong>sulted in a <strong>re</strong>duction in property, plant andequipment and <strong>re</strong>tained earnings at $11,034,810, an inc<strong>re</strong>ase in exploration expenditu<strong>re</strong> for <strong>the</strong>year of $6,066,977, and a dec<strong>re</strong>ase in <strong>the</strong> impairment of unproved petroleum and natural gasinte<strong>re</strong>sts <strong>re</strong>cognised in <strong>the</strong> year of $986,964.b) Reclassification of exploration and evaluation costsUnder Canadian GAAP property, plant and equipment included certain exploration andevaluation expenditu<strong>re</strong> incur<strong>re</strong>d within established geographic cost pools. Under IFRS, suchexploration and evaluation costs a<strong>re</strong> <strong>re</strong>cognised as tangible or intangible based on <strong>the</strong>ir natu<strong>re</strong>.At 31 December 2006, this has <strong>re</strong>sulted in <strong>the</strong> <strong>re</strong>classification from property, plant and equipment<strong>to</strong> intangible exploration assets of $56,311,426 (1 January 2005—$32,589,744; 31 December2005—$45,111,919).c) Capitalisation of property, plant and equipment dep<strong>re</strong>ciation of intangible assetsUnder IFRS, dep<strong>re</strong>ciation of property, plant and equipment utilised in exploration activities iscapitalised as intangible exploration assets. As <strong>the</strong>se assets we<strong>re</strong> classified as property, plant andequipment under Canadian GAAP, dep<strong>re</strong>ciation of fixed assets was not included in <strong>the</strong> balance.The impact on adoption <strong>to</strong> IFRS at 1 January 2005 is an inc<strong>re</strong>ase in intangible exploration assetsand <strong>re</strong>tained earnings of $135,898. At 31 December 2005, an inc<strong>re</strong>ase in intangible explorationassets and <strong>re</strong>tained earnings of $171,728 and a dec<strong>re</strong>ase in dep<strong>re</strong>ciation expense for <strong>the</strong> year of$35,830. At 31 December 2006, an inc<strong>re</strong>ase in intangible exploration assets and <strong>re</strong>tained earningsof $171,728.d) Reversal of impairmentUnder IFRS, impairment losses p<strong>re</strong>viously <strong>re</strong>corded a<strong>re</strong> <strong>re</strong>versed if <strong>the</strong> conditions giving rise <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> impairment have <strong>re</strong>versed. The <strong>re</strong>versal of impairment losses was not permitted underCanadian GAAP. The impact on adoption <strong>to</strong> IFRS at 1 January 2005 is an inc<strong>re</strong>ase in inven<strong>to</strong>ryof $24,976, an inc<strong>re</strong>ase in property, plant and equipment of $1,656,846, and an inc<strong>re</strong>ase in<strong>re</strong>tained earnings of $1,681,822.At 31 December 2005, this has <strong>re</strong>sulted in inc<strong>re</strong>ases in inven<strong>to</strong>ry of $35,441, property, plant andequipment of $1,442,748, <strong>re</strong>tained earnings of $1,478,189, and depletion expense for <strong>the</strong> yearof $203,633.At 31 December 2006, this has <strong>re</strong>sulted in inc<strong>re</strong>ases in inven<strong>to</strong>ry of $26,638, property, plant andequipment of $1,071,212, <strong>re</strong>tained earnings of $1,097,850 and depletion expense for <strong>the</strong> yearof $380,339.e) Sha<strong>re</strong>-based paymentsUnder Canadian GAAP, <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>re</strong>cognised an expense <strong>re</strong>lated <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir sha<strong>re</strong>-based paymentson a straight-line basis through <strong>the</strong> date of full vesting. Under IFRS, <strong>the</strong> Group is <strong>re</strong>qui<strong>re</strong>d <strong>to</strong><strong>re</strong>cognise <strong>the</strong> expense over <strong>the</strong> individual vesting periods for <strong>the</strong> graded vesting awards.At 31 December 2005, this has <strong>re</strong>sulted in inc<strong>re</strong>ases in general and administrative expenses andsha<strong>re</strong>-based payments <strong>re</strong>serves of $456,747, with a cor<strong>re</strong>sponding dec<strong>re</strong>ase in <strong>re</strong>tained earnings.218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!