10.07.2015 Views

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

$(106,943) (30 September 2006—$(53,228); 31 December 2006—$(236,730); 31 December2005—$(139)) higher/(lower), mainly as a <strong>re</strong>sult of fo<strong>re</strong>ign exchange gains/losses ontranslation of Russian rouble-denominated cash in bank and monetary assets and liabilities.At 30 September 2007, if <strong>the</strong> GBP pound sterling had st<strong>re</strong>ng<strong>the</strong>ned/weakened by 10%against <strong>the</strong> US dollars with all o<strong>the</strong>r variables held constant, <strong>the</strong> loss for <strong>the</strong> period wouldhave been $781,534 (30 September 2006—$749,534; 31 December 2006—$730,637;31 December 2005—$686,923) higher/(lower), mainly as a <strong>re</strong>sult of fo<strong>re</strong>ign exchange gains/losses on translation of GBP pound sterling-denominated long-term loan.At 30 September 2007, if <strong>the</strong> Swiss franc had st<strong>re</strong>ng<strong>the</strong>ned/weakened by 10% against <strong>the</strong>US dollar with all o<strong>the</strong>r variables held constant, <strong>the</strong> loss for <strong>the</strong> period would have been$(432,727) (30 September 2006—$(294,544); 31 December 2006—$(286,493);31 December 2005—$(117,816)) higher/(lower), mainly as a <strong>re</strong>sult of fo<strong>re</strong>ign exchange gains/losses on translation of Swiss franc-denominated cash in bank.ii) Commodity price riskThe Corporation is exposed <strong>to</strong> commodity price risk <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> extent that it will sell itsentitlement <strong>to</strong> petroleum, condensate and liquid petroleum gas production on a floatingprice basis.The Corporation may consider partly mitigating this risk in <strong>the</strong> futu<strong>re</strong>.The table below summarises <strong>the</strong> impact of inc<strong>re</strong>ases/dec<strong>re</strong>ases of <strong>the</strong> <strong>re</strong>levant oil /condensate / LPG benchmark on <strong>the</strong> Corporation’s post-tax profit or loss for <strong>the</strong> period andon equity. The analysis is based on <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong> commodity prices had inc<strong>re</strong>ased /dec<strong>re</strong>ased by 5% with all o<strong>the</strong>r variables held constant:Year ended Nine-month periods31 December ended 30 September2005 2006 2006 2007$ $ $ $(Unaudited)B<strong>re</strong>nt light crude ...................... — — — 49,227Condensate .......................... 42,088 196,926 133,812 77,831LPG ............................... 17,118 144,786 15,393 15,09559,206 341,712 149,205 142,153Post-tax profit for <strong>the</strong> year and equity would inc<strong>re</strong>ase/dec<strong>re</strong>ase as a <strong>re</strong>sult of commodity<strong>re</strong>venues <strong>re</strong>ceived.iii) Inte<strong>re</strong>st rate riskThe Group had fixed rate long-term debt and fixed rate convertible bonds in <strong>the</strong> periodunder <strong>re</strong>view, <strong>the</strong><strong>re</strong>fo<strong>re</strong> it was not exposed <strong>to</strong> inte<strong>re</strong>st rate risk.iv) C<strong>re</strong>dit riskAll of <strong>the</strong> Corporation’s production is derived from <strong>the</strong> Republic of Congo, Russia andOman. In 2006, 2005, and for <strong>the</strong> nine-month periods ended 30 September 2007 and 2006,<strong>the</strong> Corporation sold all of its production, at any point in time, in each country <strong>to</strong> a singlecus<strong>to</strong>mer for each commodity. Accordingly, substantially all <strong>the</strong> Corporation’s accounts<strong>re</strong>ceivables from petroleum and natural gas sales we<strong>re</strong> from a maximum of four cus<strong>to</strong>mersduring <strong>the</strong>se periods.Deb<strong>to</strong>rs of <strong>the</strong> Corporation a<strong>re</strong> subject <strong>to</strong> internal c<strong>re</strong>dit <strong>re</strong>view <strong>to</strong> minimize <strong>the</strong> risk ofnon-payment. The Corporation does not anticipate any default as it transacts withc<strong>re</strong>ditworthy counterparties.No c<strong>re</strong>dit limits we<strong>re</strong> exceeded during <strong>the</strong> <strong>re</strong>porting periods and management does notexpect any losses from non-performance by <strong>the</strong>se counterparties.190

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!