10.07.2015 Views

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

Prospectus re Admission to the Official List - Heritage Oil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

25 Commitments and contingencies<strong>Heritage</strong>’s net sha<strong>re</strong> of outstanding contractual commitments at 30 September 2007 was estimated at:Less thanAfterTotal 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years 5 years$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000Long-term debt ......................... 17,662 617 1,234 8,334 7,477Convertible bonds ....................... 158,000 — — 158,000 —Total <strong>re</strong>payments of borrowings ............. 175,662 617 1,234 166,334 7,477Operating leases ........................ 9,642 229 458 458 8,497O<strong>the</strong>r long-term obligations ................ 140,000 40,000 100,000 — —Work program obligations ................. 124,759 58,236 52,259 14,065 200Total contractual obligations ................ 274,401 98,465 152,717 14,523 8,697The Corporation may have a potential <strong>re</strong>sidual obligation <strong>to</strong> satisfy any shortfall in officers’ andformer officers’ secu<strong>re</strong>d <strong>re</strong>al estate borrowings in <strong>the</strong> event of default, a shortfall on <strong>the</strong> proceedsfrom <strong>the</strong> disposal of <strong>the</strong> properties and <strong>the</strong> individuals being unable <strong>to</strong> <strong>re</strong>pay <strong>the</strong> balance. The value of<strong>the</strong> <strong>re</strong>sidual obligation was estimated as insignificant.On 6 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2006, <strong>the</strong> Corporation <strong>re</strong>leased Mr. Micael Gulbenkian from his role as its Chairmanand Chief Executive Officer.In many of <strong>the</strong> countries in which <strong>the</strong> Group operates, land title systems a<strong>re</strong> not developed <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>extent found in many industrial countries and <strong>the</strong><strong>re</strong> may be no concept of <strong>re</strong>giste<strong>re</strong>d title. Although<strong>the</strong> Group believes that it has title <strong>to</strong> its oil and gas properties, it cannot control or completely protectitself against <strong>the</strong> risk of title disputes or challenges. The<strong>re</strong> can be no assurance that claims orchallenges by third parties against <strong>the</strong> Group’s properties will not be asserted at a futu<strong>re</strong> date. TheGroup <strong>re</strong>ceived a letter from <strong>the</strong> Iraq Ministry of <strong>Oil</strong> dated 17 December 2007 stating that <strong>the</strong>Production Sharing Contract (‘‘PSC’’) signed with <strong>the</strong> Kurdistan Regional Government (‘‘KRG’’)without <strong>the</strong> prior approval of <strong>the</strong> Iraqi government) is conside<strong>re</strong>d <strong>to</strong> be void by <strong>the</strong> Iraqi governmentas <strong>the</strong>y have stated it violates <strong>the</strong> ‘‘p<strong>re</strong>vailing Iraqi law’’. On <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> KRI legal advice, <strong>the</strong>Di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>rs believes that <strong>the</strong> PSC is valid and effective pursuant <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> applicable laws.In addition, <strong>the</strong> DRC work programme pursuant <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> DRC PSC cannot be commenced prior <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>grant of a p<strong>re</strong>sidential dec<strong>re</strong>e from <strong>the</strong> DRC government. The<strong>re</strong> can be no assurance that finalapproval or ratification will ever be <strong>re</strong>ceived in <strong>re</strong>spect of <strong>the</strong> DRC PSC or that <strong>the</strong> p<strong>re</strong>-ag<strong>re</strong>ed fiscalterms will not be <strong>re</strong>-negotiated at a later date by <strong>the</strong> DRC government.Fur<strong>the</strong>rmo<strong>re</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>re</strong>ceived a letter from <strong>the</strong> chairman of <strong>the</strong> Management Committee of <strong>the</strong>National <strong>Oil</strong> Corporation of Libya dated 28 February 2008 stating that <strong>the</strong> Block 7 licence a<strong>re</strong>a lieswithin <strong>the</strong> Libyan continental shelf and a portion of this a<strong>re</strong>a has al<strong>re</strong>ady been licensed <strong>to</strong> Sirte <strong>Oil</strong>Company. This letter also demands that <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>re</strong>frain from any activities over or concerning <strong>the</strong>Block 7 licence a<strong>re</strong>a and asserts <strong>the</strong> Libyan government’s right <strong>to</strong> invoke Libyan and international law<strong>to</strong> protect its rights in <strong>the</strong> Block 7 licence a<strong>re</strong>a. The Di<strong>re</strong>c<strong>to</strong>rs believe that <strong>the</strong> Libyan government’sclaims a<strong>re</strong> unfounded.209

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!