10.07.2015 Views

Warning Analysis for the Information Age - Higgins Counterterrorism ...

Warning Analysis for the Information Age - Higgins Counterterrorism ...

Warning Analysis for the Information Age - Higgins Counterterrorism ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Input = (1) Analyst Input of METATEXT records: (a) re<strong>for</strong>matted from SHOE-BOX DB by analyst, or (b) input from already METATAGGED DBs (such as <strong>the</strong>PubMed online biomedical DB).(2) Analyst feedback to adjust visual or network displays.Processing = (1) METATEXT data mining (with data mining tools <strong>for</strong> tabulardata).(2) MDA Chart presentation (such as by Analyst Notebook)Output = Presentation of: (1) text or visual displays of data mining(2) MDA chart displays (with hyperlinks to DATACOLLECTION DB <strong>for</strong> original report with highlighted markups).Analysts view <strong>the</strong> presented graphs, networks, and <strong>the</strong> like from <strong>the</strong> ENTITYDB and:■ Analyze: Analyst evaluates data outputs provided by (1) METATEXTdata mining tools or (2) MDA chart presentations or (3) link analysisdirectly from documents in <strong>the</strong> shoebox.■ Marshal Evidence: Analyst builds MDA models using maps, timelines,and organization charts, and builds HYPERTEXT documents<strong>for</strong> input to PRESENTATION DB.[Note that since this is all-source analysis at this point, collection analysts atNSA, NIMA, and FBIS should ideally not be expected to do this level of analysis;however, since current collaboration tools are not adequate, <strong>the</strong> collectionanalysts must do this to be able to per<strong>for</strong>m <strong>the</strong> SIGINT, IMINT, or OSINT collectiontask properly].[The ENTITY DB will potentially prove to be <strong>the</strong> most valuable analytical DBin <strong>the</strong> future, but currently constitutes a huge gap in <strong>the</strong> IC’s repertoire of ITtools. A shared ENTITY DB would be <strong>the</strong> equivalent of a shared electronic 3x5card deck. Imagine if a historian were writing a new book on <strong>the</strong> Civil War and,instead of having just <strong>the</strong> library <strong>for</strong> references, could have access to an electronicversion of <strong>the</strong> 3x5 card note decks of Bruce Catton and a dozen o<strong>the</strong>r Civil Warhistorians, complete with original references on each. The value added would beimmense, not only in tracing hypo<strong>the</strong>ses supported by Catton’s books but also intesting hypo<strong>the</strong>ses he may have had and discarded (but kept <strong>the</strong> cards <strong>for</strong> futurereference) and in testing completely new hypo<strong>the</strong>ses not covered in <strong>the</strong> linearthreads reported in <strong>the</strong> narratives of his books. However, as Catton’s 3x5 carddeck might have actually been a pile of highlighted copies of documents andhandwritten records, <strong>the</strong> cost of transferring <strong>the</strong>se documents to electronic <strong>for</strong>mat144

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!