10.07.2015 Views

Warning Analysis for the Information Age - Higgins Counterterrorism ...

Warning Analysis for the Information Age - Higgins Counterterrorism ...

Warning Analysis for the Information Age - Higgins Counterterrorism ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

environment. In a world of limited resources, an organism or organization isalways faced with <strong>the</strong> choice, “Do I use my resources today or save <strong>the</strong>m <strong>for</strong>tomorrow?”The guns or butter tradeoff comes from <strong>the</strong> dichotomy between <strong>the</strong> need of <strong>the</strong>organism or organization to sense and respond to <strong>the</strong> environment and <strong>the</strong> need toreproduce. The more resources put into systems that allow efficient ability tomaintain today’s organism or organization—<strong>the</strong> guns that allow defense fromenvironmental threats—<strong>the</strong> better <strong>the</strong> existing organism or organization can survivetoday. However, <strong>the</strong> more resources put into systems that allow effectiveability to build tomorrow’s progeny organism or organization—<strong>the</strong> “butter” tobuild new infrastructure—<strong>the</strong> better <strong>the</strong> progeny of <strong>the</strong> organism or organizationwill be able to survive tomorrow. In a world of limited resources, an organism ororganization is always faced with <strong>the</strong> choice, “Do I use my resources to makeguns or butter?”The intelligence or operations tradeoff comes from <strong>the</strong> dichotomy between <strong>the</strong>need of <strong>the</strong> organism or organization to be able to effectively sense (observe andorient) and to efficiently respond (decide and act). The more resources an organismor organization can use to observe <strong>the</strong> world in fine detail in many ways andintegrate those observations into contingency plans <strong>for</strong> a wide variety of environments,<strong>the</strong> better it can make in<strong>for</strong>med decisions. However, <strong>the</strong> more resources anorganism or organization can use to make rapid decisions and con<strong>for</strong>m coordinatedactions, <strong>the</strong> better it can exploit <strong>the</strong> environment. In a world of limitedresources, an organism or organization is always faced with <strong>the</strong> choice, “Do I usemy resources <strong>for</strong> better intelligence or <strong>for</strong> more efficient operations?” This ultimatelytranslates into “Do I organize myself into a network or into a hierarchy?”The best kind of organization in any case is <strong>the</strong> one that can best completeDecision Cycles that address <strong>the</strong> three tradeoffs... Today or tomorrow? Guns orbutter? Intelligence or operations?As we will see shortly, <strong>the</strong> critical point in any Decision Cycle is <strong>the</strong> transitionfrom orienting to decisionmaking. This depends on both an accurate and completeinternal map/model of <strong>the</strong> world and <strong>the</strong> ability to provide actionableoptions <strong>for</strong> all <strong>for</strong>eseeable futures. An organization that can build and implement<strong>the</strong> most effective and efficient plan will be <strong>the</strong> one that will prevail.And we will see that <strong>the</strong> choices made by <strong>the</strong> organism or organization notonly determine how much of its resources to allocate to intelligence but also whatkind of intelligence to value most... current intelligence, tactical warning, or strategicwarning.62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!