Commuter Rail Extension Alternatives Analysis - Transportation ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUNTY PASSENGER RAIL STATIONSALTERNATIVES ANALYSISImpactAG-C1: Will the project have the potentialto have a cumulative impact onagriculture?3.10. NoiseNO-1: Would the Project expose personsto or generate noise levels in excess ofstandards established in the local generalplan or noise ordinance, or applicablestandards of lead or responsibleagencies?NO-2: Would the Project expose personsto or generate excessive groundbornevibration or groundborne noise levels?NO-3: Would the Project cause asubstantial permanent increase in ambientnoise levels in the project vicinity?NO-4: Would the Project cause asubstantial temporary or periodic increasein ambient noise levels in the projectvicinity?NO-5: For a project located within anairport land use plan or, where such aplan has not been adopted, within twomiles of a public airport or public useairport, would the Project expose peopleresiding or working in the project area toexcessive noise levels?NO-6: For a project within the vicinity of aprivate airstrip, would the Project exposepeople residing or working in the projectarea to excessive noise levels?NO-1c: Will the Project have the potentialto generate cumulative noise impacts inexcess of standards or cause asubstantial increase in noise levels aboveexisting levels in the project vicinity?3.11. SocioeconomicsPH-1: Would the Project inducesubstantial population growth in an area,either directly (for example, by proposingnew homes and businesses) or indirectly(for example, through extension of roadsor other infrastructure)?Pre-mitigationSignificanceLess thansignificantSignificantMitigation MeasureNo mitigation necessary.NO-1: Utilize special horndesigns, establish quiet zones, orinstall residential sound insulation.Significance afterMitigationLess thansignificantLess thansignificantNo impact No mitigation necessary. No impact.Less thansignificantSignificantNO-1: Utilize special horndesigns or establish quiet zones.NO-4: Implement BestManagement Practices duringconstruction of the project.Less thansignificantLess thansignificantNo impact No mitigation necessary. No impactNo impact No mitigation necessary. No impactPotentiallysignificantSignificantRegionally, noise impacts fromincreased service on the rail linescould be minimized by implementationof additional noise abatementmethods such as limited useof train horns, as described abovein Mitigation Measure NO-1.PH-1A: Implement MontereyCounty and City of Salinas GrowthManagement PoliciesPH-1B: Implement TAMC<strong>Transportation</strong>-Related PrinciplesLess thansignificant.Less thansignificantparsons CHAPTER 5: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 141
CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUNTY PASSENGER RAIL STATIONSALTERNATIVES ANALYSISImpactPH-2: Would the Project displacesubstantial numbers of existing housing orpeople, necessitating the construction ofreplacement housing elsewhere?PH-3: Would the Project displacesubstantial numbers of existingbusinesses or jobs, requiring relocation ofbusinesses or employees elsewhere?PH-1c: Would the Project have thepotential to have a cumulative impact onpopulation, housing, or socio-economics?Pre-mitigationSignificancePotentiallysignificantPotentiallysignificantLess thansignificant3.12. Public Services, Utilities, and Service SystemsPSU-1: Will the Project increase demandfor police, fire, water, wastewatertreatment and disposal, or solid wasteremoval to such a degree that acceptedservice standards are not maintained?PSU-2: Will project construction disruptpolice, fire, water, wastewater treatmentand disposal, or solid waste removal tosuch a degree that accepted servicestandards are not maintained?PSU-3: Will the project constructionand/or permanent operation result ingreater demand for school, library, andpark facilities and services?PSU-C1: Will the project have significantcumulative impacts to public services andutility resources?3.13. Parks and RecreationPR-1: Would the project increase theuse of existing recreational facilities,including neighborhood and regionalparks, such that substantial physicaldeterioration of the existing facilities wouldoccur or be accelerated?PR-2. Would the project includerecreational facilities or require theconstruction or expansion of recreationalfacilities, which might have an adversephysical effect on the environment?Less thansignificantLess thansignificantLess thansignificantLess thansignificantLess thansignificantMitigation MeasurePH-2: Implement procedures forresidential acquisition andrelocation consistent with City ofSalinas Redevelopment Agencyrequirements and the federalUniform Act (49 CFR 24C Section24.205).PH-3: Implement procedures forbusiness property acquisition andrelocation consistent with City andCounty requirements and thefederal Uniform Act (49 CFR 24CSection 24.205).No mitigation is necessary.No mitigation is necessary.No mitigation is necessary.No mitigation is necessary.No mitigation is necessary.No mitigation is necessary.Significance afterMitigationLess thansignificantLess thansignificantLess thansignificantLess thansignificantLess thansignificantLess thansignificantLess thansignificantLess thansignificantNo impact No mitigation is necessary. No impactparsons CHAPTER 5: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 142
Page 4 and 5:
DRAFTCALTRAIN EXTENSIONTO MONTEREY
Page 6 and 7:
CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUN
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125: CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUN
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
show all

Commuter Rail Extension Alternatives Analysis - Transportation ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?