Commuter Rail Extension Alternatives Analysis - Transportation ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUNTYALTERNATIVES ANALYSISTable 8-5Travel Time Savings (minutes per one-way trip)—Method 3Origin StationPajaro Castroville SalinasDestination Station Caltrain Express Bus Caltrain Express Bus Caltrain Express Bus2010San Jose (Santa Clara–Mid) 0 0 0 0 0 0Mountain View (Santa Clara–North) 7 7 0 0 0 02030San Jose (Santa Clara–Mid) 0 0 0 0 0 0Mountain View (Santa Clara–North) 39 28 34 21 31 16Source: ParsonsTable 8-6Selected Wage Rates (2004 unless noted)Job Location and Type Average Annual Wage Hourly WageSanta Clara County—High Tech $126,729 $60.93Santa Clara County—All Private $ 72,225 $34.72Monterey County—All Industries (Q3 2005) $ 37,459 $18.01Statewide—High Tech $ 90,554 $43.54Statewide—All Private $ 44,045 $21.18Source: American Electronics Association, California Development DepartmentBased on the ridership assessment of likely origin–destination patterns, the average wage rate of allSilicon Valley workers is assumed as the basis for commuting value of time. At $34.72 per hour,50 percent of this amount equals $17.36.Value of Travel Time SavingsThe number of annual passengers forecast for the Caltrain <strong>Extension</strong> and Express Bus alternatives isreported in Table 8-7.Table 8-7Annual Passengers—Caltrain <strong>Extension</strong> to SalinasAnnual PassengersEgress/Access Pajaro Castroville Salinas Total2010Santa Clara–Mid 48,960 10,200 89,250 148,410Santa Clara–North 106,590 22,440 193,290 322,320San Mateo 12,240 2,550 21,930 36,720San Francisco 5,610 1,020 10,200 16,830173,400 36,210 314,670 524,2802030Santa Clara–Mid 85,170 25,500 173,400 284,070Santa Clara–North 184,620 55,590 374,850 615,060San Mateo 20,910 6,120 42,840 69,870San Francisco 9,690 3,060 19,380 32,130300,390 90,270 610,470 1,001,130Source: Parsonsparsons CHAPTER 8: EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES 181
CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUNTYALTERNATIVES ANALYSISCombining these ridership levels with the value of in-vehicle transit travel time ($17.36/hour) and theminutes of travel time “savings” yields the following computations of user benefits.Table 8-8User Time Benefits—Method 1Egress/Access Pajaro Castroville Salinas Total2010Santa Clara–Mid $ 566,630 $118,048 $1,084,566 $ 1,769,244Santa Clara–North 2,683,083 564,860 4,977,346 8,225,289San Mateo* 308,105 64,189 564,712 937,006San Francisco* 141,215 25,675 262,657 429,527$3,699,033 $772,772 $6,889,281 $11,361,0862030Santa Clara–Mid $1,281,411 $ 427,924 $ 3,110,565 $ 4,819,900Santa Clara–North 6,356,590 2,010,565 13,990,901 22,357,996San Mateo* 719,945 221,340 1,598,960 2,540,245San Francisco* 333,633 110,670 723,339 1,167,642$8,691,579 $2,770,439 $19,423,765 $30,885,783Source: Parsons*Travel time savings/rider assumed to be equal to Santa Clara–North.Table 8-9User Time Benefits—Method 3Egress/Access2010CaltrainPajaro Castroville Salinas TotalExpressBusCaltrainExpressBusCaltrainExpressBusCaltrainExpressBusSanta Clara–Mid — — — — — — — —Santa Clara–North $ 215,880 $ 215,880 — — — — — —San Mateo* $ 24,790 $ 24,790 — — — — — —San Francisco* $ 11,362 $ 11,362 — — — — — —$ 252,032 $ 252,082 — — — — $ 252,032 $ 252,0822030Santa Clara–Mid — — — — — — — —Santa Clara–North 2,083,252 1,495,668 546,857 337,765 3,362,154 1,735,305 5,992,263 3,568,738San Mateo* 235,948 169,399 60,204 37,185 384,246 198,321 680,398 404,905San Francisco* 109,342 78,502 30,102 18,593 173,826 89,716 313,270 186,811$2,428,542 $1,743,569 $637,163 $393,543 $3,920,226 $2,023,342 $6,985,931 $4,160,454*Travel time savings/rider assumed to be equal to Santa Clara–North.parsons CHAPTER 8: EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES 182
Page 4 and 5:
DRAFTCALTRAIN EXTENSIONTO MONTEREY
Page 6 and 7:
CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUN
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165: CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUN
Page 264 and 265:
show all

Commuter Rail Extension Alternatives Analysis - Transportation ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?