Commuter Rail Extension Alternatives Analysis - Transportation ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUNTY PASSENGER RAIL STATIONSALTERNATIVES ANALYSISImpactPR-3: Would the project preclude orsubstantially limit the use of existing parkand recreational facilities by the generalpublic?PR-C-1. Would the proposed projectresult in cumulative impacts to parklandand recreation?3.14. TrafficTC-1: Will Project cause the 5-year or 10-year (cumulative) no project LOS at ananalysis location—to worsen from LOS Cor better to LOS D or worse?TC-2: Will the Project cause the existingor cumulative no project LOS at ananalysis location within the City of Salinasor unincorporated Monterey County toworsen from LOS D or better to LOS E orworse?TC-3: Will the Project worsen already (orprojected) unacceptable operations at ananalysis location?TC-4: Will the Project create aninconsistency with policies concerningroadway systems set forth in the GeneralPlans for the City of Salinas and MontereyCounty?TC-5: Will the Project create the demandfor public transit service above that whichis provided, or planned to be provided?TC-6: Will the Project disrupt or interferewith existing or planned public transitservices or facilities?TC-7: Will the Project create aninconsistency with policies concerningtransit systems set forth in the GeneralPlans for the City of Salinas and MontereyCounty?TC-8: Will the Project disrupt or interferewith existing or planned bicycle orpedestrian facilities?TC-9: Will the Project create an unmetneed for bicycle or pedestrian facilities?Pre-mitigationSignificancePotentiallysignificantLess thansignificantSignificantSignificantSignificantMitigation MeasurePR-3: Prepare a TrafficManagement Plan toAccommodate Parking around theHarvey-Baker House duringProject Construction.No mitigation is necessary.TC-1: Install traffic signal atSalinas Road and RailroadAvenue in Pajaro.TC-1: Install traffic signal atSalinas Road and RailroadAvenue in Pajaro.TC-3 Install traffic signal atSalinas Road and RailroadAvenue in Pajaro; reroute MSTbus routes as needed to avoidcongestion at Salinas Road andWest Market Street.Significance afterMitigationLess thansignificantLess thansignificantLess thansignificantLess thansignificantLess thansignificant; LPASignificant andUnavoidable;AlternativeCastoville Site.No impact No mitigation necessary. No impactLess thansignificantNo mitigation necessary.Less thansignificantNo impact No mitigation necessary. No impactNo impact No mitigation necessary. No impactNo impact No mitigation necessary. No impactLess thansignificantNo mitigation necessary.Less thansignificantparsons CHAPTER 5: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 143
CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUNTY PASSENGER RAIL STATIONSALTERNATIVES ANALYSISImpactTC-10: Will the Project create aninconsistency with policies related tobicycle or pedestrian systems in theGeneral Plans of the City of Salinas andMonterey County?TC-C1: Will the Project have the potentialto have a cumulative impact on traffic andcirculation?TC-C2: Will the Project have the potentialto have a cumulative impact on activehighway/rail at-grade crossings?TC-C3: Will the Project have the potentialto have a cumulative impact on freighttrain operations?Pre-mitigationSignificanceMitigation MeasureSignificance afterMitigationNo impact No mitigation necessary. No impactLess thansignificantLess thansignificantPotentiallysignificantNo mitigation necessary.No mitigation necessary.TC-C3 Conduct 4-train RailCapacity Analysis. Work withUnion Pacific to identify capitalinvestments in track, switch, andsignaling required to accommodateboth commuter and freighttrains. Include these investmentsas part of the Locally PreferredAlternative.Less thansignificantLess thansignificantLess thansignificant.parsons CHAPTER 5: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 144
Page 4 and 5:
DRAFTCALTRAIN EXTENSIONTO MONTEREY
Page 6 and 7:
CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUN
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127: CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUN
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
show all

Commuter Rail Extension Alternatives Analysis - Transportation ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?