Commuter Rail Extension Alternatives Analysis - Transportation ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUNTY PASSENGER RAIL STATIONSALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS• April 5, 2005 – Televised interview regarding fixed guideway investment options onKNRY/AMP.• April 5, 2005 – Presentation to Sand City Council of Monterey County Fixed GuidewayAlternatives (open to public).• April 5, 2005 – Presented options for rail service to Monterey County and announced Aprilpublic meetings on KNRY and Access Monterey Peninsula (AMP).• April 6, 2005 – Public informational meeting/open house regarding Monterey CountyGuideway Alternatives at Seaside Community Center, 7 PM to 9 PM.• April 27, 2005 – Public informational meeting/open house regarding Monterey CountyGuideway Alternatives at Monterey Conference Center, 7 PM to 9 PM.• June 10, 2005 – Presented rail projects and 14-year plan on KNRY and AMP.• July 11, 2005 – Rail Policy Committee deliberations regarding the shortlisting of MontereyCounty Fixed Guideway Alternatives (open to public).• July 26, 2005 – Presentation to LandWatch Monterey County on the Castroville rail station inthe context of the Community Plan.• August 3, 2005 – Teleconference with FTA staff regarding project status.• August 8, 2005 – Presentation to Rail Policy Committee on Monterey County Fixed Guidewaymode technology and deployment options. Continued deliberation on shortlisting ofalternatives (open to public).• September 12, 2005 – Presentation of bus rapid transit technologies, FTA AlternativesAnalysis process, and Rail Policy Committee selection of four shortlisted alternatives forHighway 101 Corridor and Monterey Peninsula Fixed Guideway/express bus transit service(open to the public).• October 10, 2005 – Presentation to MST Board regarding transit-oriented developmentopportunities at Fort Ord/University Villages site.• November 2, 2005 – Teleconference with FTA staff regarding project status, need for MST onboardrider survey.• November 7, 2005 – Discussed the benefits of Amtrak Thruway bus service to MontereyCounty and TAMC rail projects at the Amtrak Thruway bus ribbon-cutting ceremony.• December 8, 2005 – Discussed TAMC’s 14-year plan, rail program and transit-orienteddevelopment program with the Monterey Bay chapter of the Association of EnvironmentalProfessionals.• January 9, 2006 – Rail Policy Committee discussion of Caltrain Extension demonstrationservice to accelerate implementation (open to public).• February 6, 2006 – Coordination meeting with Caltrans Division of Rail, Amtrak, UPRR andTAMC to discuss Coast Line capacity improvements and Caltrain extension.• February 6, 2006 – Rail Policy Committee continued discussion of Caltrain Extension demonstrationservice (open to public).• February 14, 2006 – Discussed Transit-Oriented Development/Transit Villages/”SmartGrowth,” Rail projects and the 14-year plan on KNRY and AMP.parsons CHAPTER 7: FINDINGS FROM PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOPS ON ALTERNATIVES 173
CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUNTY PASSENGER RAIL STATIONSALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS• April 3, 2006 – Presentation to Rail Policy Committee of Caltrain Extension Draft EnvironmentalImpact Report. Rail Policy Committee approves Draft Environmental Impact Report forpublic review (open to public).• April 7, 2006 – Federal Transit Administration staff tour of project sites.• April 26, 2006 – Caltrain Extension to Monterey County Passenger Rail Stations DraftEnvironmental Impact Report circulation for public review.• May 9, 2006 – Discussed Caltrain project and transit-oriented development on KNRY andAMP.• May 10, 2006 – Informational presentation of Caltrain Extension Draft Environmental ImpactReport to Action Pajaro public meeting.• May 16, 2006 – Caltrain Extension Draft Environmental Impact Report informational briefingon agenda for Salinas City Council regularly scheduled City Council meeting (open to thepublic). Public input was received on the project. American Supply Company opposed thetaking of their lands for the project, but supported the Caltrain Extension to MontereyCounty/Salinas. Council persons asked questions regarding ITC Expansion integration withthe First Mayor’s (Harvey-Baker) House.• May 24, 2006 – Caltrain Extension Draft Environmental Impact Report Public Hearing onTAMC regularly scheduled Board Meeting. No public comment was made at the meeting.• May 24, 2006 – Informational presentation of Caltrain Extension Draft Environmental ImpactReport to Castroville Development Citizens Advisory Subcommittee (public meeting).• May 30, 2006 – Federal Transit Administration staff tour of project sites.• June 5, 2006 – Presentation to Rail Policy Committee of Caltrain Extension AlternativesAnalysis study findings (open to the public).• June 7, 2006 – VTA/TAMC coordination meeting regarding Draft Environmental Impact Reportand summary of business plan assumptions.• July 12, 2006 – Meeting with JPB and VTA staff to review project status and summary ofbusiness plan assumptions.• August 23, 2006 – TAMC Board of Directors public hearing and certification of the FinalEnvironmental Impact Report.• August 29, 2006 – Discussed Caltrain project Final Environmental Impact Report on KNRYand AMP.• September 22, 2006 – Distribution of Draft Caltrain Extension to Monterey County AlternativesAnalysis study report to public agencies and TAMC Rail Policy Committee.• October 2, 2006 – TAMC Rail Policy Committee discussion of Draft Caltrain Extension toMonterey County Alternatives Analysis and endorsement of the Build Alternative as theLocally Preferred Alternative (open to the public).• October 2, 2006 – Distribution of the Alternatives Analysis report to the public via TAMC’s website.• January 31, 2007 – TAMC Board adoption of the Caltrain Extension to Monterey County asthe Locally Preferred Alternative (open to the public).parsons CHAPTER 7: FINDINGS FROM PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOPS ON ALTERNATIVES 174
Page 4 and 5:
DRAFTCALTRAIN EXTENSIONTO MONTEREY
Page 6 and 7:
CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUN
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157: CALTRAIN EXTENSION TO MONTEREY COUN
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
show all

Commuter Rail Extension Alternatives Analysis - Transportation ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?