11.07.2015 Views

Saticoy & Wells Community Plan & Development ... - City Of Ventura

Saticoy & Wells Community Plan & Development ... - City Of Ventura

Saticoy & Wells Community Plan & Development ... - City Of Ventura

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Saticoy</strong> & <strong>Wells</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> and Code EIRSection 4.11 NoiseTable 4.11-4Comparison of Existing and Future Noise Levelson Key Project Area RoadwaysRoadway SegmentEstimated Noise Level(dBA CNEL)Existing2025 withProjectChange(dB)SignificantImpact?Telegraph Rd b/w <strong>Saticoy</strong> and <strong>Wells</strong> 68.9 69.3 0.4 NoTelegraph Rd b/w <strong>Saticoy</strong> and <strong>City</strong> limit 67.1 67.8 0.7 No<strong>Saticoy</strong> Ave b/w Telegraph and SR 126 65.4 65.4 0.0 No<strong>Saticoy</strong> Ave b/w Darling and Telephone 65.4 66.3 0.9 NoTelephone Rd b/w <strong>Saticoy</strong> and <strong>Wells</strong> 68.6 69.2 0.6 NoDarling Rd b/w <strong>Saticoy</strong> and <strong>Wells</strong> 61.4 61.4 0.0 No<strong>Wells</strong> Rd south of Telephone 71.1 72.4 1.3 No<strong>Wells</strong> Rd b/w Telephone and Darling 75.2 76.7 1.5 Yes<strong>Wells</strong> Rd b/w Darling and SR 126 71.4 73.0 1.6 Yes<strong>Wells</strong> Rd b/w SR 126 and Telegraph 70.5 a -- -- No<strong>Wells</strong> Rd b/w SR 126 and A St 70.5 72.3 b 1.8 Yes<strong>Wells</strong> Rd b/w A St and Telegraph 70.5 69.7 b -0.8 NoSR 126 west of <strong>Wells</strong> Road 75.1 76.6 1.5 YesA St b/w <strong>Saticoy</strong> and <strong>Wells</strong> c -- 59.7 -- NoSource: Federal Highway Administration, Traffic Noise Model version 2.5, Appendix DThose figures reflecting bold typing exceed FICON thresholds as indicated in Table 4.11-3.aThis segment exists only in the Existing scenario, it is broken up into two segments for the future conditions.Therefore, for comparison purposes, this noise level is used for the existing scenario for the two segments thissegment was broken into.bThese segments were separated for the future scenario from the segment identified above.cThis is a new roadway segment for the future scenario. Therefore, no comparison exists.residential developments within the mapped 60 decibel (dBA) CNEL contour and mitigationnecessary to ensure that:• Noise in exterior spaces of new residences and other noise sensitive uses that areused for recreation (such as patios and gardens) does not exceed 65 dBA CNEL; and• Interior noise in habitable rooms of new residences does not exceed 45 dBA CNELwith all windows closed.In addition, Action 7.37 of the 2005 General <strong>Plan</strong> requires the use rubberized asphalt or othersound reducing material for paving and re-paving of <strong>City</strong> streets, including roadways withinCaltrans ROW. Studies have indicated that rubberized asphalt reduces overall roadway noiseby 3-5 dB as compared to conventional asphalt. Such a reduction would offset the potential 1.54.11-7<strong>City</strong> of <strong>Ventura</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!