11.07.2015 Views

Saticoy & Wells Community Plan & Development ... - City Of Ventura

Saticoy & Wells Community Plan & Development ... - City Of Ventura

Saticoy & Wells Community Plan & Development ... - City Of Ventura

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Saticoy</strong> & <strong>Wells</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> and Code EIRSection 4.1 AestheticsThe Parklands Specific <strong>Plan</strong> and Hansen Specific <strong>Plan</strong> contain mitigation measures to soften thevisual effects of the proposed sound walls. The mitigation measure below would soften theeffects of other potential sound walls proposed in the Project Area.<strong>Wells</strong> Road. Following development of the Parklands Specific <strong>Plan</strong> and Broome Siteviewers along <strong>Wells</strong> Road would see primarily multi-family residential structures if looking tothe west or east. The visually sensitive designation for <strong>Wells</strong> Road is intended to preserveviews of the hillsides, which are visible when traveling northbound toward the hillsides at theterminus of <strong>Wells</strong> Road. The proposed development would not interfere with views of thehillsides, as the <strong>Wells</strong> Corridor leads straight to the hillsides, while the proposed developmentswould occur adjacent the western and eastern boundaries of <strong>Wells</strong> Road. Thus, the Project’seffects with respect to the <strong>Wells</strong> Road visual corridor and obstruction of hillside views would beless than significant.Telegraph Road. With respect to Telegraph Road, the proposed developments wouldoccur south of Telegraph Road, whereas the hillsides lie to the north. Thus, although theproposed development would alter the character of views to the south by convertingagricultural land and vacant land to residential and commercial uses, it would not obstructviews of the hillsides to the north. Thus, the visual effect of development along the TelegraphRoad corridor would be less than significant.Mitigation Measures. Inclusion of the following mitigation measure would reduce theimpacts of potentially monolithic sound walls that could potentially be constructed in theProject Area.AES-2(a) Sound Walls. Views of sound walls abutting SR 126 shall be softenedthrough installation of landscaping such as trees, shrubs and climbingvines, resulting in a variety of textures and colors.Significance After Mitigation. Impacts would be less than significant with the adoptionof Mitigation Measure AES-2(a).Impact AES-3<strong>Development</strong> that would be facilitated by the Project wouldpotentially introduce new sources of light and glare.However, implementation of current and proposed lightingstandards and policies on new development would reduceimpacts to a Class III, less than significant, level.<strong>Development</strong> that could be facilitated by the Project would increase the ambient nighttimelighting throughout the Project Area. Increased lighting could come from streetlights, parkinglot lights, and signage on business establishments. Increased glare could potentially occur as aresult of building materials, roofing materials, and windows reflecting sunlight. <strong>Development</strong>facilitated by the Project would occur mostly on agricultural land and vacant land, areas thathave traditionally not had nighttime lighting. Areas that would experience the greatestpotential for increased lighting are those areas likely to experience the greatest amount ofdevelopment. Locations in which potential future development would occur include the<strong>Saticoy</strong> Village Specific <strong>Plan</strong> Area, Hansen Specific <strong>Plan</strong> Area, Parklands Specific <strong>Plan</strong> Area, and4.1-14<strong>City</strong> of <strong>Ventura</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!