11.07.2015 Views

Saticoy & Wells Community Plan & Development ... - City Of Ventura

Saticoy & Wells Community Plan & Development ... - City Of Ventura

Saticoy & Wells Community Plan & Development ... - City Of Ventura

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Saticoy</strong> & <strong>Wells</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> and Code EIRSection 4.15 Traffic and Circulation<strong>Development</strong> of the Broome site facilitated by the Project would add a mixed-use developmentthat was not considered in the 2005 General <strong>Plan</strong> FEIR traffic analysis. The General <strong>Plan</strong> trafficanalysis did not include residential dwelling units and included a split of 165,000 square feet ofretail with the <strong>Saticoy</strong> Village Specific <strong>Plan</strong>. However, the analysis relied upon in this EIR is notcompromised by this issue because the development projections for each parcel are within theallowable densities provided by the General <strong>Plan</strong>, and the addition of the dwelling units to theBroome Site does not exceed the 1,990 dwelling units analyzed in the General <strong>Plan</strong> trafficanalysis.Table 4.15-6Year 2025 A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Level of ServiceIntersectionControlA.M. Peak HourP.M. Peak HourICU/Delay LOS ICU/Delay LOS1. Telegraph Rd/<strong>Saticoy</strong> Ave Signal 0.47 A 0.51 A2. Telegraph Rd/Nevada Ave a Stop Sign 10.2 sec B 10.5 B3. Telegraph Rd/<strong>Wells</strong> Rd Signal 0.63 B 0.63 B4. Telegraph Rd/Kimball Rd a Signal 0.24 A 0.34 A5. Telegraph Rd/Petit Ave a Signal 0.42 A 0.28 A6. <strong>Wells</strong> Rd/Carlos St a Stop Sign 12.1 B 14.8 B7. <strong>Wells</strong> Rd/Citrus Dr-Blackburn Rd a Signal 0.38 A 0.45 A8. <strong>Wells</strong> Rd/SR-126 WB Ramps b Stop-Sign 0.33 A 0.50 A9. <strong>Wells</strong> Rd/SR-126 EB Ramps b Signal 0.65 B 0.74 C10. <strong>Wells</strong> Rd/Darling Rd Signal 0.69 B 1.06 F11. <strong>Wells</strong> Rd/Nardo St a Signal 0.71 C 0.72 C12. Telephone Rd/<strong>Saticoy</strong> Ave Signal 0.47 A 0.46 A13. Telephone Rd/<strong>Wells</strong> Rd Signal 0.72 C 0.73 C14. Telephone Rd/Kimball Rd a Signal 0.76 C 0.66 B15. Telephone Rd/Montgomery Ave a Signal 0.58 A 0.35 A16. Telephone Rd/Petit Ave a Signal 0.45 A 0.58 A17. <strong>Saticoy</strong> Ave/Darling Rd Signal 0.35 A 0.29 ASource: <strong>City</strong> of <strong>Ventura</strong>, 2005 General <strong>Plan</strong> EIR, 2005.a Data taken from Parklands Cumulative 2025 scenario based on 2005 <strong>City</strong> of <strong>Ventura</strong> General <strong>Plan</strong> development.b LOS E (ICU less than or equal to 1.00) is acceptable at this location (freeway ramps). LOS D (ICU less than or equal to0.90) is the recommended performance standard for all other intersection locations.4.15-13<strong>City</strong> of <strong>Ventura</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!