12.07.2015 Views

Stimulating investment in pearl farming in ... - World Fish Center

Stimulating investment in pearl farming in ... - World Fish Center

Stimulating investment in pearl farming in ... - World Fish Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Suitability of Habitats for Growth of Black-Lip and Silver-Lip Pearl Oysters F<strong>in</strong>al, June 2008Friedman et al. (1998) exam<strong>in</strong>ed the availability of wild spat <strong>in</strong> seven habitats across sevenregions (Gela, Seghe, Noro, Gizo, South Malaita, Ysabel and Shortlands) of the SolomonIslands:• <strong>in</strong>ner lagoons with low water movement and periodic run-off from land masses;• mid lagoon <strong>in</strong> shallow areas or close to reefs, where there was either low, some ormoderate water movement;• mid lagoon near channel flows, where there was moderate water movement;• the outer edge of lagoons, near channel flows with moderate water flow; and• outside barrier/fr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g reef, near channel flows with moderate waterflows).They showed that reasonable quantities of spat could be collected from some habitats with<strong>in</strong>“open” reef systems, particularly from sites with clear water and moderate currents thatwere at least 35 m from the nearest reef. The <strong>in</strong>ner lagoon habitats at Seghe, Noro, Gizo andSouth Malaita yielded the smallest numbers of spat, which is <strong>in</strong> contrast to the situation <strong>in</strong>Polynesia. Friedman et al. (1998) noted that these lagoonal sites differed from the atollsystems <strong>in</strong> Polynesia <strong>in</strong> that they were smaller, shallower, had soft rather than firmsubstrata, and were more turbid due to runoff of sediment and nutrients from their adjacentland masses. They suggested that collectors were less effective at these sites, because theybecame clogged with particulate matter and overgrown with epiphytic algae, particularlydur<strong>in</strong>g the ra<strong>in</strong>y season. Sites that were located near extensive reef systems with clearwater, had moderate current flow, depths > 15 m and were at least 35 m from the nearestreef generally yielded the most spat, with the greatest numbers be<strong>in</strong>g collected at midlagoon sites at Nusa Tupe, Gizo and an outside barrier/fr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g reef site at Noro. Theirstudy also showed that the collectors attracted predatory gastropods and crabs and that alarge proportion (42%) of the oyster spat collected was dead. Friedman et al. (1998)concluded that there is potential for black-lip <strong>pearl</strong> cultivation <strong>in</strong> these “open” reef systemsbased on collection of wild spat, provided that the high rate of mortality can be reduced.Friedman and Bell (1999) subsequently exam<strong>in</strong>ed seasonal differences <strong>in</strong> the availability ofspat <strong>in</strong> offshore and <strong>in</strong>shore zones of “open” reef systems <strong>in</strong> two contrast<strong>in</strong>g geographicregions bordered by major landmasses, an embayed lagoonal system at Gizo and anenclosed sound at Noro. They predicted that more spat would be collected from offshorethan <strong>in</strong>shore zones and that spatfall <strong>in</strong> the offshore zone would be similar <strong>in</strong> “wet” and“dry” seasons, but greater dur<strong>in</strong>g the “dry” than <strong>in</strong> the “wet” season <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>shore zone.In both seasons, significantly more spat were collected <strong>in</strong> the offshore zone than <strong>in</strong> the<strong>in</strong>shore zone at both locations (Friedman and Bell 1999). The offshore-<strong>in</strong>shore pattern ofabundance could be due to environmental conditions suitable for the settlement of spatbe<strong>in</strong>g less suitable <strong>in</strong>shore than offshore because of the greater <strong>in</strong>fluence of runoff from theland masses, greater flows offshore may result <strong>in</strong> more water and larvae com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to contactwith the collectors, differential predation after settlement or differential supply of larvaebetween zones. Although the <strong>in</strong>fluence of these factors was not determ<strong>in</strong>ed, Friedman andBell (1999) concluded that differential predation after settlement was unlikely to be a majorfactor because the variation <strong>in</strong> abundance of liv<strong>in</strong>g spat was similar to that for total numberof spat. In the offshore zone, similar numbers of spat were collected at Gizo dur<strong>in</strong>g bothseasons, but at Noro significantly more spat were collected dur<strong>in</strong>g the “dry” than the “wet”season. The seasonal decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> abundance of spat <strong>in</strong> the offshore zone at Noro may havebeen due to greater than average runoff result<strong>in</strong>g from cyclone activity be<strong>in</strong>g channelledthrough the sound further offshore than usual. At Gizo, the runoff is more likely to haveThe Ecology Lab Pty Ltd – Mar<strong>in</strong>e and Freshwater Studies Page 22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!