3 4 CHAIRMAN: Good morning, Mr. Murphy. 5 - The Tribunal of ...

11915:25:361 JUDGE FAHERTY: So if you weren't involved in Sterling transactions it would2 appear that physically on the day on the 9th of March, somebody, in respect of3 the two 1,000s. You were there at the teller lodging money, if you say you4 were, if it's accepted that you lodged the money to Cecelia Ahern's account and15:25:535 you would step out again and allow somebody else to conduct a transaction and6 you go back again. Do you see what I'm saying?7 A. Yes, Judge.89 JUDGE FAHERTY: It seems completely illogical that that sequence of events15:26:0610 would have happened on that day, Ms. Carruth.11 A. I accept that, thank you, Judge.12 Q. 674 MR. O'NEILL: Having accepted it, Ms. Carruth, do you have any explanation that13 you can offer to the Tribunal as to why it is that there are this sequence of14 documents proceeding with item transaction No. 12, the exchange of 4,000 pounds15:26:3015 Sterling for 4,119.59 pounds a unique series of figures? That the very next16 transaction No. 13 that goes through the system, has exactly the same sequence17 of numbers 4,119.59. I suggest to you that it is absolutely proof positive18 that those two transactions are interlinked because they have exactly the same19 six digits in the same sequence as each other, isn't that right?15:27:0320 A. Yes.21 Q. 675 Yes. Did you ever lodge money to Mr. Ahern's account and in particular did you22 lodge this 4,119.59 pounds to his account?23 A. It was only brought to my attention last week that Mr. Ahern even had an24 account over there.15:27:2925 Q. 676 Well that is hardly an answer to the question I am asking you. Did you ever26 lodge cash to Mr. Ahern's accounts and in particular did you lodge this27 4,119.59 pounds to his accounts?28 A. I have no memory of that.29 Q. 677 Well why have you no memory of the fact that you may have lodged cash to15:27:5430 Mr. Ahern's accounts?Premier Captioning & Realtime Limitedwww.pcr.ie Day 839