3 4 CHAIRMAN: Good morning, Mr. Murphy. 5 - The Tribunal of ...

12115:28:531 CHAIRMAN: It's not a sum -- you are unlikely to go over with 1,028.40 pounds?2 A. That doesn't make sense.34 CHAIRMAN: Twice.15:29:035 A. Yes.67 CHAIRMAN: In effect twice.8 A. Yes. You would, to me I would wound it up to 1,000 pounds or that.915:29:1310 CHAIRMAN: So given that we see your name here?11 A. Yes.1213 CHAIRMAN: Is it still your position that you don't believe you were involved14 with this particular transaction or is it the case that you accept that you15:29:2715 probably were but you have no recollection of it?16 A. I accept, Judge, I probably was but I have no recollection of it.1718 CHAIRMAN: All right.1915:29:3720 Q. 678 MR. O'NEILL: So if you probably were involved in such a transaction or series21 of transactions on this one day, Ms. Carruth, it would follow that somebody had22 given you 6,000 pounds in Sterling with an instruction that you would lodge23 4,000 of it to Mr. Ahern's account when translated into Irish money. That you24 would lodge 1,000 of it when translated into Irish money to the account of each15:30:0525 of his daughters, isn't that the so? That's the only logical sequence that can26 happen, isn't that right?27 A. I have no recollection of Sterling ever being in my hands.2829 MR. MILLAR: Sorry, Mr. Chairman, sorry to interrupt. I think my client was15:30:2530 agreeing with the Chairman's assertion there that she was involved in thePremier Captioning & Realtime Limitedwww.pcr.ie Day 839