3 4 CHAIRMAN: Good morning, Mr. Murphy. 5 - The Tribunal of ...

2211:13:361 A. No, no.23 CHAIRMAN: 4,119. So it's therefore a notional drawdown or a notional4 purchase?11:13:475 A. It is, basically a book figure.67 CHAIRMAN: If it's somebody coming in who is not linked to the, to Mr. Ahern's8 account and it happens to be a completely different customer and who wants to9 take this money in cash, they would presumably, they would be, there would be11:14:0810 an actual drawdown of the funds?11 A. There would have been, yes.1213 CHAIRMAN: Yes. And how would that appear in documentation or would it14 appear?11:14:2615 A. Well --1617 CHAIRMAN: I know that your evidence is and I understand it, that this and the18 transaction going in to Mr. Ahern's account are separate in the sense that19 there's no paperwork to link one with the other, is that right?11:14:4320 A. No, there isn't. I haven't seen whether there is anything in the lodgement21 docket of his account.2223 CHAIRMAN: There is nothing on the face of this document which says that this24 is the money that goes into Mr. Ahern's account?11:14:5725 A. No.2627 CHAIRMAN: No. What's remarkable, if you like, about it is that the amounts28 are the same and the times of the transactions are close together and it's the29 same teller.11:15:1330 A. And the same teller.Premier Captioning & Realtime Limitedwww.pcr.ie Day 839