3 4 CHAIRMAN: Good morning, Mr. Murphy. 5 - The Tribunal of ...

12215:30:291 lodgement to the girls accounts. Maybe that's what she meant I think.23 MR. O'NEILL: Well --415:30:375 CHAIRMAN: I want to be quite clear about this. Ms. Carruth also accepts that6 it was unlikely that she'd have gone over with 1,028.40 pounds into the bank,7 that odd sum and lodged unless it was either a cheque, which we know it wasn't,8 or linked to a Sterling amount. Because if would, clearly and she accepts9 this, it wouldn't have been logical for somebody to use pence in those15:31:1210 circumstances on an odd figure when lodging to two separate accounts. That's11 her position, as I understand it.1213 Q. 679 MR. O'NEILL: You see, you were asked, Ms. Carruth, in the course of an14 interview back in July of 2006, which followed upon Mr. Ahern having informed15:31:3315 the Tribunal that lodgements were made by you and by Ms. Sandra Cullagh to --16 Sorry, not lodgements but cheques of his were exchanged in financial17 institutions for cash by you and by Ms. Cullagh. And this was during a period18 when he did not operate any bank accounts, isn't that so?19 A. Yes.15:31:5920 Q. 680 You are aware of that? He indicated to the Tribunal that he would give his pay21 cheque to you or to Ms. Cullagh and that it would be cashed and the cash would22 be brought back to him in his office?23 A. Yes.24 Q. 681 Isn't that so? And you were asked at interview what your role was in his15:32:1925 banking affairs and you gave evidence or you gave an answer to questions put to26 you in relation to it, isn't that so?27 A. Yes.28 Q. 682 Now, I will just recap on that if we may by looking at page 17932, a series of29 questions and answers starting at question six. That's page 17932. Question15:32:5130 six, please.Premier Captioning & Realtime Limitedwww.pcr.ie Day 839