day architecture fashioned on the basis <strong>of</strong> therecommendations <strong>of</strong> the Kargil Report, has beenan improvement in terms <strong>of</strong> better monitoring<strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> intelligence input, bothtactical <strong>and</strong> strategic, <strong>and</strong> coordination <strong>and</strong>concerted action, enlisting participation <strong>of</strong> otheragencies, including the CPOs.During the Kargil conflict, my unhappy experiencewas that valuable inputs shared by the IB with theArmy <strong>and</strong> others on the mobilisation <strong>and</strong> plans <strong>of</strong>the ‘Jehadi’ elements across Kargil sector, did notreceive the attention that the gravity <strong>of</strong> the reportdeserved. It was not subjected to proper scrutinyby the military minds in the field, to test <strong>and</strong>retest its veracity, with reference to the situation<strong>and</strong> developments that prevailed in the borderingareas along Kargil. Had this been done, the Armywould have asked from the IB additional inputs,in order to put together the pieces <strong>of</strong> the puzzlefor action. Unfortunately, the valuable contents<strong>of</strong> the report remained without any properexamination. This only showed the mind set<strong>of</strong> the Armed Forces to <strong>of</strong>ten treat intelligenceinput, including those catered by its own MilitaryIntelligence, with a sense <strong>of</strong> disbelief <strong>and</strong> disdain.In the process, intelligence died a prematuredeath for being ignored. No wonder, the worstenemy <strong>of</strong> intelligence is <strong>of</strong>ten, none other thanits own consumers.In sharp contrast to this, Intelligence receivedmuch greater appreciation <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ingfrom the political establishment. The UnionHome Minister L.K. Advani, broke from thepast, <strong>and</strong> tasked the IB, for the first time, tomake presentations on serious security issues<strong>and</strong> challenges that the country faced, beforethe Parliamentary Committee on Home Affairs.Presentations made by senior IB <strong>of</strong>ficers dealingwith the concerned subjects like J&K, Terrorism,‘Jehadi‘ activities from across the borders etc.,were highly appreciated by the Parliamentarians<strong>of</strong> different hues. They were frank enough toadmit that several aspects <strong>of</strong> the presentations<strong>and</strong> the steps taken by the Intelligence Agenciesto deal with the scourge <strong>of</strong> terror, were not knownto them. They requested the Home Minister tocontinue with the Interactive Sessions with theMPs, on a regular basis.The Prime Minister, himself, once asked the IBto brief a select group <strong>of</strong> MPs, <strong>and</strong> some CabinetMinisters on J&K, before embarking upon hisdecision to go for a cease-fire. Needless to say,that the purpose behind the brain stormingsession was kept a closely guarded secret. Onanother occasion, the Prime Minister desired apresentation before the Cabinet Committee onSecurity (CCS), on the situation in J&K in theaftermath <strong>of</strong> the ceasefire.Unlike the bureaucracy, the political leadershipwas also very much appreciative <strong>of</strong> the awfultruth that the best <strong>of</strong> Intelligence Organisationsaround the world, could not escape failure, bigor small. They are not always able to come upto the high expectations <strong>of</strong> the people to detect<strong>and</strong> prevent all dangers <strong>and</strong> untoward incidents.Further, they can neither trumpet their successnor defend their failure. They, therefore, learn toenjoy <strong>and</strong> suffer both the inevitables, in silence<strong>and</strong> stoically. These pr<strong>of</strong>essional hazards makethe Intelligence pr<strong>of</strong>ession one <strong>of</strong> the mostunenviable. It is not every body’s cup <strong>of</strong> tea.The fact that the political establishment attachedgreat importance to the Intelligence Agencieswas evident when the Central Governmentsent a select team <strong>of</strong> senior <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> the IB<strong>and</strong> its Tech unit, R&AW <strong>and</strong> the MEA to carryout negotiations with the hijackers in K<strong>and</strong>aharin the aftermath <strong>of</strong> the hijacking <strong>of</strong> the IndianAirlines Flight No.814 on December 24, 1999.The captive communication, established bythe IB Tech Team, facilitated round the clockcommunication, on the progress <strong>of</strong> negotiations,from the K<strong>and</strong>ahar Airport, Afghanistan, to theDIB for regular briefing <strong>of</strong> the CCS, Cabinet,the Home Minister <strong>and</strong> the Prime Minister, inparticular. The hard bargaining by the joint team,forced the hijackers to climb down from theirover ambitious list <strong>of</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>s. What happenedthereafter, on the night <strong>of</strong> December 31st, 2000,is known to all.The Special Issue <strong>of</strong> the Indian <strong>Police</strong> Journal tocommemorate the 125th Anniversary <strong>of</strong> the IB,made me reminisce about the rich contributionmade by the Annual Conferences <strong>of</strong> the DGs<strong>and</strong> Intelligence Chiefs <strong>of</strong> the States <strong>and</strong> theUTs, under the Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> the DIB. Thisinstitutionalised forum has helped the <strong>Police</strong><strong>and</strong> Intelligence fraternity to work shoulder toshoulder, even at a time when the federal relations40The Indian <strong>Police</strong> Journal, October - December, 2012, Special Issue
etween the states <strong>and</strong> the centre suffered fromserious stress <strong>and</strong> strain.I recall with a supreme sense <strong>of</strong> satisfaction howthe Prime Minister Shri Atal Behari Vajpayeerecognised <strong>and</strong> appreciated the dire need foraugmenting the grant <strong>of</strong> funds, on a long termbasis, for the modernisation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Police</strong> Forcesin the country, after his interactive sessionwith a select group <strong>of</strong> DGs during the annualconference in 2000. Since then, the <strong>Police</strong>has not experienced any paucity <strong>of</strong> funds <strong>and</strong>its modernisation has continued apace withsincerity <strong>and</strong> seriousness. The entire creditfor this phenomenal change in the funding<strong>and</strong> modernisation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Police</strong> forces, bothat the centre <strong>and</strong> the states, goes to Shri AtalBehari Vajpayee who set up a Committee,comprising DG, Rajasthan, DG, BPR&D <strong>and</strong> theDIB, besides the Cabinet Secretary, PrincipalSecretary <strong>and</strong> the Home Secretary, <strong>and</strong> onits recommendations, funds got immediatelysanctioned by the MHA. Another feather in thecap <strong>of</strong> the DGs conference, was its success toprevail over the Finance Commission <strong>of</strong> thetime, to treat certain aspects <strong>of</strong> Policing as part<strong>of</strong> the Plan Budget. This has added to the c<strong>of</strong>fers<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Police</strong> administration across the country.Earlier, the “Tenure Rules(1988)”, which werenot considered attractive enough to inspire theyoung IPS <strong>of</strong>ficers to pursue Intelligence as acareer, were taken up by me for modification,immediately after assuming charge <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fice<strong>of</strong> the DIB in 1998. The leadership modified thetenure rules, emphasizing categorically that thecareer prospects in the lB should be dealt withon a footing separate from that <strong>of</strong> the CPOs.It, however, ran into difficulties because <strong>of</strong> thereservations recorded by the MHA on some <strong>of</strong>the important recommendations that put the lBon a footing, separate from that <strong>of</strong> the CPOs.When the file with changes made by the MHA,reached the PMO, the DIB had to seek the kindpersonal intervention <strong>of</strong> the Prime Minister whoimmediately asked the PMO to reexamine thefile in consultation with the DIB <strong>and</strong> put up forclearance. The PMO appreciated the specialmodifications made by the lB in the TenureRules, <strong>and</strong> put its stamp <strong>of</strong> approval, perhaps inApril 2000, on important recommendations likethe ‘in situ’ promotions for senior <strong>of</strong>ficers fromthe rank <strong>of</strong> Deputy Director to Special Directorafter completion <strong>of</strong> the required numbers <strong>of</strong>years <strong>of</strong> service, repatriation <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers on theground <strong>of</strong> unsatisfactory performance, release<strong>of</strong> the lB <strong>of</strong>ficers on promotion to their cadres,in case <strong>of</strong> promotion not forthcoming in thelB, consideration <strong>of</strong> Special Directors <strong>of</strong> lB forthe posts <strong>of</strong> DG, in organisations dealing withSecurity <strong>and</strong> Intelligence etc. Later, a strong casemade by the lB before the Kargil Sub Committeeon Intelligence for more foreign assignments forthe lB Officers than the existing few, was alsoagreed. Thus, the career prospects <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>ficersjoining the IB, st<strong>and</strong> vastly improved today thanbefore.Personally, I remain most indebted to theIntelligence <strong>Bureau</strong> which enabled me to havea life time experience <strong>of</strong> working with the PrimeMinister on a day to-day basis, who adhered tonorms <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional ethics <strong>and</strong> administrativepropriety.Another great pillar <strong>of</strong> strength <strong>and</strong> supportwas the Union Home Minister who wouldring up personally to keep abreast <strong>of</strong> the latestdevelopments. This required the DIB to try<strong>and</strong> remain on toes all the time. It was entirelyhis vision to open a dialogue between theParliamentarians <strong>and</strong> the Intelligence Agencies ina proper forum for better appreciation <strong>of</strong> complexissues affecting the security <strong>and</strong> integrity <strong>of</strong> thecountry. It generated stupendous confidence <strong>and</strong>courage <strong>of</strong> conviction among the IB <strong>of</strong>ficers. Italso helped in adding to the image <strong>of</strong> the IB.The Home Minister encouraged free <strong>and</strong> frankexchange <strong>of</strong> views, even if it meant statingsomething unpalatable for the ruling party.I feel most honoured to have led the Organisationfor three years <strong>and</strong> more. I remain deeply <strong>and</strong>pr<strong>of</strong>oundly grateful to late Shri S.M. Mathur,DIB, who took personal interest to prevail overlate Jyoti Basu, the then Chief Minister <strong>of</strong> WestBengal, for my early release from the state, ondeputation to the IB. I was most fortunate tohave got trained <strong>and</strong> worked for years underesteemed senior Shri M.K. Narayanan <strong>and</strong> otherDIBs like S/Shri T.V. Rajeshwar, R.K. Kapoor,H.A. Barari <strong>and</strong> V.G. Vaidya. I also remaingrateful to a battery <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, both inHeadquarters <strong>and</strong> outstations, known for theirThe Indian <strong>Police</strong> Journal, October - December, 2012, Special Issue 41
- Page 1 and 2:
The Indian Police JournalOctober -
- Page 3 and 4: From the Director’s DeskNew Delhi
- Page 5 and 6: 23rd December, 1887: TheJourney beg
- Page 7 and 8: Courtesy - National Archives of Ind
- Page 9 and 10: The Logo released on the completion
- Page 11 and 12: Helmsmen of the IB during thePre-In
- Page 13 and 14: SHRI V.G. VAIDYA, IPS(MAR 1992 TO J
- Page 15 and 16: “Sleeman sahib ki jai”“No Cri
- Page 17 and 18: their life and their problems relat
- Page 19 and 20: Settling down of criminal tribes wa
- Page 21 and 22: perish. Between 1841 and 1848, anot
- Page 23 and 24: In conclusion, I would like to reco
- Page 25 and 26: own race alone, had to be withdrawn
- Page 27 and 28: a bee in his bonnet” 17 , and abo
- Page 29 and 30: epresented by Tilak and his followe
- Page 31 and 32: The agency more and more fine-tuned
- Page 33 and 34: US was brewing, one William Hopkins
- Page 35 and 36: came under the control of Indian mi
- Page 37 and 38: neutralised many efforts by inimica
- Page 39 and 40: e published by the Intelligence Bur
- Page 41 and 42: As DD (Security), IB, I had occasio
- Page 43 and 44: Chhomohlohri, all of them juxtapose
- Page 45 and 46: Dormers Building, ShimlaThe Dormers
- Page 47 and 48: eforms. Warren Commission, on the a
- Page 49 and 50: and systems will increasingly come
- Page 51 and 52: violence and destabilisation. This
- Page 53: one develop. The all pervasive cult
- Page 57 and 58: Intelligence Agencies inIndian Demo
- Page 59 and 60: Democracies are, today, everywhere
- Page 61 and 62: depend substantially on the restrai
- Page 63 and 64: Of Pistols and Pigs andthe Old Tidd
- Page 65 and 66: it is lovingly caressed hundreds of
- Page 67 and 68: Through the Eyes of an IB OfficerSh
- Page 69 and 70: an Intelligence agency. He used to
- Page 71 and 72: My J&K ExperienceShri R.K. Kapoor,
- Page 73 and 74: there. We remained stranded there f
- Page 75 and 76: Scaling Himalayan Heights withthe I
- Page 77 and 78: proceed to Dungti to supervise the
- Page 79 and 80: tour of the White House and Lincoln
- Page 81 and 82: into unconsciousness two hours earl
- Page 83 and 84: which was completed successfully wi
- Page 85 and 86: leaders. This happened around the t
- Page 87 and 88: My Unforgettable Yearsin the North-
- Page 89 and 90: stated that Prakash Singh, Assistan
- Page 91 and 92: take her into confidence. That woul
- Page 93 and 94: Police - Intelligence InterfaceShri
- Page 95 and 96: Shreekant Bapat and I surveyed the
- Page 97 and 98: excellence, dedication and commitme
- Page 99 and 100: Immigration, Inter-State Disputes,
- Page 101 and 102: Observations on India’s State and
- Page 103 and 104: assessments that arose after the ca
- Page 105 and 106:
levels. The deficiencies of one par
- Page 107 and 108:
of laying a network of useful roads
- Page 109 and 110:
Technology in Intelligence-Future S
- Page 111 and 112:
These are just some of the aspects
- Page 113 and 114:
Figure 6: Open Source Information o
- Page 115 and 116:
events) and inference from evidence
- Page 117 and 118:
9North Atlantic Treaty Organization
- Page 119 and 120:
Shri Dave was posted back to the lB
- Page 121 and 122:
He even suggested separate pay scal
- Page 123 and 124:
The Unsung HeroesThe Intelligence B