City Council Agenda - November 26, 2012 - City of Guelph

More documents

Recommendations

Info

they by-law was already in force). Typically, when considering changes to thecomposition of a council a comprehensive public engagement process isundertaken. The format for consultation is not legislated, however, due to thesignificant impacts related to compositional changes there is often a decision madeto poll the electorate by submitting a related ballot question on the ballot.The time required to undertake a council composition review would be dependentupon the process selected. Based on the fact that a compositional change wouldsignificantly impact the governance framework of a municipality, it is suggestedthat an associated review and approval process could take a year or longer in orderto complete.Ward Boundary ReviewGuelph City Council was elected through an at large method of election from 1929to 1988. A question appeared on the 1988 ballot which resulted in the electoratesupporting a transition to a ward system. Although the result of the referendumwas not binding, Council chose to modify the electoral system from 12 at largeCouncillors, to 6 wards represented by 2 Councillors. In 2006, the ward boundarieswere readjusted in order to ensure an equal distribution of voters and to reinforceeffective representation. The changes in 2006 were made in order to supportelector growth over the next several terms of office. In response to a question onthe 2006 ballot, 80% of the electorate voted in support of retaining the wardsystem. Based on a review of the final 2010 voters’ list, the elector distributionbetween the City’s 6 wards is considered to be fair and balanced.There are no statutory requirements with respect to the format or frequency ofconducting ward boundary reviews. Much like a council composition review,changes to ward boundaries should be considered by way of a comprehensiveassessment involving significant public consultation. Reviews are often guided byexternal consultants who are subject matter experts in electoral geography.Although the Act is silent on the format for a ward boundary review, it does indicatethat a by-law to alter the system must be in place a year prior to the precedingmunicipal election in which it is contemplated to take effect. That is to say, if wardboundary changes were contemplated for the 2014-2018 term of office, the by-lawwould need to be passed by December 31, 2013. Such a by-law is subject to anappeal process through the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB). The legislated timingassociated with submissions and notice provisions constitutes roughly 2 to 3months. This does not include the time required for the OMB to consider any suchappeals which would be impacted by the number registered and the complexity ofthe arguments made therein. When considering this along with the time necessaryto undertake a related assessment a ward boundary review can take anywherefrom 6 months to a year in order to complete.Question on the BallotAs noted previously, prior to considering changes which would impact thegovernance framework, a decision is often made to survey the electorate by way ofsubmitting a question on the ballot. In order to place a question on the ballot theremust be at least one public meeting to allow for input with respect to the proposedPage 4 of 5CITY OF GUELPH COMMITTEE REPORT
wording. Council is then required to pass a by-law to approve the final wording atleast 180 days prior to voting day (by April 30, 2014 for inclusion on the October27, 2014 ballot). The Minister or any other person may appeal to the ProvincialChief Election Officer on the grounds that the question is not clear, concise andneutral, or is not capable of being answered in the affirmative or the negative.CORPORATE STRATEGIC PLAN2.3 Ensure accountability, transparency and engagementFINANCIAL IMPLICATIONSA full investigation into the employment status of Councillors may require financialsupport subject to the decided method for review. A decision to move forward witha review may also require staff involved to adjust their respective departmentalwork plans. It is recommended to consider any and all necessary costs associatedwith a Council composition and/or ward boundary through the annual budgetprocess.DEPARTMENTAL CONSULTATIONN/ACOMMUNCIATIONSN/AATTACHMENTS• Attachment 1: November 18, 2008 staff report entitled “Full vs. Part timeCouncillors”• Attachment 2: 2006-2010 Survey of Councillor Time Commitments“original signed by Tina Agnello”“original signed by Blair Labelle”____________________________________________________Prepared By:Prepared/Reviewed By:Tina AgnelloBlair LabelleDeputy City ClerkCity Clerk519 822 1260 x 2811 519 822 1260 x 2232tina.agnello@guelph.cablair.labelle@guelph.ca“original signed by Mark Amorosi”__________________________Recommended By:Mark AmorosiExecutive DirectorHuman and Corporate Resources519 822 1260 x 2281mark.amorosi@guelph.caPage 5 of 5CITY OF GUELPH COMMITTEE REPORT
Page 1 and 2:
CITY COUNCILAGENDACouncil Chambers,
Page 3 and 4:
Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Board of
Page 5 and 6:
October 16, 2012 Page No. 286Commit
Page 7 and 8:
October 22, 2012 Page No. 288Counci
Page 9:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
October 22, 2012 Page No. 295The me
Page 16 and 17:
October 22, 2012 Page No. 297THAT t
Page 18 and 19:
October 22, 2012 Page No. 299AND TH
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
October 22, 2012 Page No. 303Consen
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
October 22, 2012 Page No. 307collec
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
October 22, 2012 Page No. 311Goodwi
Page 32 and 33:
October 24, 2012 Page No 313Council
Page 34 and 35:
October 24, 2012 Page No 315average
Page 36 and 37:
October 24, 2012 Page No 3172. the
Page 38 and 39:
October 24, 2012 Page No 319VOTING
Page 40 and 41:
November 5, 2012 Page No. 321(Speci
Page 42 and 43:
November 5, 2012 Page No. 323AND TH
Page 44 and 45:
November 5, 2012 Page No. 325Paris-
Page 46 and 47:
November 5, 2012 Page No. 327The me
Page 48 and 49:
Schedule 1 - Page 2November 5, 2012
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
November 6, 2012 Page No. 328Room C
Page 68 and 69:
CONSENT REPORT OF THECOMMUNITY & SO
Page 70 and 71:
COMMITTEEREPORTTOCommunity and Soci
Page 72 and 73:
Option B: The Guelph Royals apply f
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
http://www.seniors.gov.on.ca/en/afc
Page 78 and 79:
Vision , Guiding Values and Princip
Page 80 and 81:
services, housing services, and edu
Page 82 and 83:
Letter of Transmittal190 Attwell Dr
Page 84 and 85:
1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSIt has been a pl
Page 86 and 87:
Attachment 1Proposed guiding statem
Page 88 and 89:
Attachment 111. Identify locations
Page 90 and 91:
Attachment 137. Develop a Community
Page 92 and 93:
Attachment 1HEALTH AND COMMUNITY SU
Page 94 and 95:
Attachment 1Change Foundation, 2011
Page 96 and 97:
Attachment 13. Housing• (e.g. cos
Page 98 and 99:
Attachment 1Although the local popu
Page 100 and 101:
Attachment 1Similar analysis for ol
Page 102 and 103:
Attachment 1The full text of our co
Page 104 and 105:
Attachment 18. SUMMARY OF CONSULTAT
Page 106 and 107:
Attachment 1Urban design has contri
Page 108 and 109:
Attachment 1• Community Care Acce
Page 110 and 111:
Attachment 1Areas for ImprovementTh
Page 112 and 113:
Attachment 1Areas for ImprovementTh
Page 114 and 115:
Attachment 1People with mental heal
Page 116 and 117:
DiversityOlder adults are not a hom
Page 118 and 119:
Attachment 1Transit and MobilityMob
Page 120 and 121:
Attachment 1Community Support Servi
Page 122 and 123:
Attachment 1The City has done an ex
Page 124 and 125:
Attachment 1POPULATION GROWTH PROJE
Page 126 and 127:
11. RECOMMENDATIONSThis report prop
Page 128 and 129:
Attachment 1Rationale:The importanc
Page 130 and 131:
Attachment 1• Establishment of an
Page 132 and 133:
Attachment 1A standardized approach
Page 134 and 135:
Attachment 1Timeline: OngoingLead R
Page 136 and 137:
Attachment 1Recommendation Timeline
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
City of Guelph Older Adult Strategy
Page 148 and 149:
Attachment 1Activities/Actions by R
Page 150 and 151:
Attachment 1Activities/Actions by R
Page 152 and 153:
13. EVALUATIONAs noted earlier, an
Page 154 and 155:
Older Adult Strategy - Preliminary
Page 156 and 157:
Attachment 1Recommendation Proposed
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Appendix A - Steering Committee Mem
Page 164 and 165:
Attachment 137. McMaster University
Page 166 and 167:
Attachment 1Appendix D - Sample Que
Page 168 and 169:
Attachment 1In Public housing renta
Page 170 and 171:
Attachment 1RESPECT AND SOCIAL INCL
Page 172 and 173:
Attachment 1Appendix E - Summary of
Page 174 and 175:
Attachment 1County of WellingtonAff
Page 176 and 177:
Attachment 1The Seniors Advisory Co
Page 178 and 179:
Attachment 1APPENDIXSENIORS ADVISOR
Page 180 and 181:
COMPARATOR MUNICIPALITY: CHATHAM-KE
Page 182 and 183:
4. Within sixty (60) days of a vaca
Page 184 and 185:
Participants then conducted an audi
Page 186 and 187:
COMPARATOR MUNICIPALITY: BRANT/BRAN
Page 188 and 189:
6. FUNDING THE INITIATIVEDevelopmen
Page 190:
This report authored byThe Osborne
Page 208 and 209:
The issue of the cost of Police Rec
Page 210 and 211:
City Building3.1 Ensure a well desi
Page 212 and 213:
THE CHALLENGE• Community benefit
Page 214 and 215:
The Program Model for GuelphThe pro
Page 216 and 217:
Why a Community Benefit Agreement?T
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
The Interim Agreement is included a
Page 222 and 223:
Attachment 1This agreement made thi
Page 224 and 225:
City of Guelph, University of Guelp
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
CONSENT REPORT OF THECORPORATE ADMI
Page 232 and 233:
municipality’s competitive advant
Page 234 and 235:
Local Government, City Building) in
Page 236 and 237:
Similarly, implementation of the Se
Page 238 and 239:
Through this lens, the CSP Work Pla
Page 240 and 241:
Prepared By:Brenda BoisvertCorporat
Page 242 and 243:
Appendix A - Recommended CSP Work P
Page 244 and 245:
Appendix A - Recommended CSP Work P
Page 246 and 247:
51 City Wifi Business Case (Joint W
Page 248 and 249:
Report Recommendations• THAT Coun
Page 250 and 251:
Initiative Evaluation Process1. ‘
Page 252 and 253:
2. Focusing on Key Performance Indi
Page 254 and 255:
Adjusting Pace• Citizen First Ser
Page 256 and 257:
Next StepsElementInclusion of CSP r
Page 258 and 259:
Page No. 2November 26, 2012Governan
Page 260 and 261:
Government and its current context.
Page 262 and 263:
PrinciplesThe vision of Open Govern
Page 264 and 265:
• Senior Communications and Issue
Page 266 and 267:
Attachment 1: A Survey of Open Gove
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273: Attachment 1: A Survey of Open Gove
Page 286 and 287: #Overview• History• Drivers•
Page 288 and 289: #Drivers#External• “FAST” org
Page 290 and 291: #Defining Open GovTransparencyTo cr
Page 292 and 293: #Open EngagementTo build on the tra
Page 294 and 295: #Open DataTo encourage the use of p
Page 296 and 297: #Apps for Democracy• 2008 app cha
Page 298 and 299: #Access to InformationTo subscribe
Page 300 and 301: #Open GovernanceTo develop a manage
Page 302: #Track.dc.gov18
Page 305 and 306: #Next Steps• Phase 1 (2012)• Co
Page 307 and 308: I submit these comments on behalf o
Page 309 and 310: COUNCILREPORTTOGovernance Committee
Page 311 and 312: strategic issues management along w
Page 313 and 314: 2013 Council and Committee Meeting
Page 319 and 320: COMMITTEEREPORTTOGovernance Committ
Page 321: Standing Committees 2009 2010 2011
Page 334 and 335: 2006-2010 Councillor Time Commitmen
Page 336 and 337: Good governance creates a strong fu
Page 338 and 339: __________________________Prepared
Page 340 and 341: Appendix B - Preliminary Review of
Page 342 and 343: COMMITTEEREPORTTOGovernance Committ
Page 344 and 345: In an effort to demonstrate efficie
Page 346 and 347: Deliverables would include:• Iden
Page 348 and 349: Options ConsideredWhile the Assessm
Page 350 and 351: Option C: Organizational Assessment
Page 352 and 353: Option E: Organization Assessment (
Page 354 and 355: ConclusionOur strategic plan sets o
Page 356 and 357: CONSENT REPORT OF THENOMINATING COM
Page 358 and 359: COMMITTEEREPORTTOOperations, Transi
Page 360 and 361: 1. ParkingIt will be necessary to e
Page 362 and 363: DEPARTMENTAL CONSULTATIONFinance &
Page 364 and 365: COMMITTEEREPORTTOPlanning & Buildin
Page 366 and 367: CORPORATE STRATEGIC PLAN1.2 Develop
Page 368 and 369: f. The following is inserted as the
Page 370 and 371: REPORTBarrel Works Guelph Limited h
Page 372 and 373:
SCHEDULE A- LOCATION MAPPage 4 of 6
Page 374 and 375:
SCHEDULE B- SIGNAGE FOR VARIANCE123
Page 376 and 377:
Part Lot 6, Registered Plan 128;Par
show all

City Council Agenda - November 26, 2012 - City of Guelph

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?