13.07.2015 Views

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

142 M. Srinivasarao, S.C. Patwardhan, <strong>and</strong> R.D. GudiWeiner structure. The linear dynamic component <strong>of</strong> these models is parameterizedusing generalized orthonormal basis filters (GOBF) [3, 4]. We then proceedto show how the identified models can be used for inter-sample inferential estimation<strong>of</strong> the slowly sampled variable <strong>and</strong> also for model predictive control <strong>of</strong>such irregularly sampled, multi-rate systems. The efficacy <strong>of</strong> the proposed modeling<strong>and</strong> control scheme is demonstrated by conducting simulation studies ona benchmark CSTR system [5] which exhibits input multiplicity <strong>and</strong> change inthe sign <strong>of</strong> steady state gain in the operating region.2 Development <strong>of</strong> Multi-rate NOE+NARMA <strong>Model</strong>In this work, we make following assumptions: (a) Sampling rates for all measurementsare integer multiples <strong>of</strong> some time period called ‘shortest time unit’ (T ).(b)All actuators are to be manipulated at a frequency corresponding to the ‘shortesttime unit’ (T ).<strong>and</strong> (c) The effect <strong>of</strong> unmeasured disturbances on the outputscan be adequately captured by an additive nonlinear noise model. Thus, the manipulatedinputs are changed at {t k = kT : k =0, 1, 2, ...} while the i th outputmeasurements are assumed to be available only at sampling instants given bythe sub-sequence {k i0 ,k i1 ,k i2, ...} such that the difference k il − k il−1 = q il (> 1)where q il is an integer.We propose to use nonlinear output error (NOE) structure to model the deterministiccomponent in the data. This choice is motivated by the fact thatthe internal model in an NMPC formulation is required to have good predictionability with respect to the manipulated inputs. It can be argued that the NOEmodels, which are driven only by the manipulated inputs, have good long rangeprediction ability. The choice <strong>of</strong> NOE structure implies that the deterministiccomponent <strong>of</strong> a r × m MIMO system can be modeled as r MISO NOE models.The irregularly sampled model residuals generated while identifying the deterministiccomponent are further modeled as r SISO nonlinear stochastic models.Thus, in order to simplify the notation, without loss <strong>of</strong> generality, we carry outthe model development for a MISO system. Therefore in the sequel we dropthe subscript ’i’ that we used above to indicate variables associated with i’ thoutput . Given input sequence {u(k) :k =0, 1, 2, .....N} <strong>and</strong> the correspondingirregularly sampled output data {y(k l ):k l = k 0 ,k 1 ,k 2 , ...} collected from a plantwhere k l represents sampling instants. We propose a two step approach to thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> deterministic <strong>and</strong> stochastic models for a general multivariate,nonlinear system with fading memory. In the first step, we develop a MISO fastrate Weiner type NOE model <strong>of</strong> the form,X u (k +1) = Φ u X u (k)+Γ u u(k) (1)ŷ u (k) =Ω u [ X u (k)] (2)for k l ≤ k

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!