13.07.2015 Views

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Interval Arithmetic in Robust <strong>Nonlinear</strong> MPCD. Limon 1 ,T.Alamo 1 ,J.M.Bravo 2 ,E.F.Camacho 1 ,D.R.Ramirez 1 ,D. Muñoz de la Peña 1 ,I.Alvarado 1 , <strong>and</strong> M.R. Arahal 11 Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas y Automática, Universidad de Sevilla,Sevilla, Spain{limon, alamo, eduardo, danirr, davidmps, alvarado,arahal} @cartuja.us.es2 Departamento de Ingeniería Electrónica, Sistemas Informáticos y Automática.Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spaincaro@uhu.esSummary. This paper shows how interval arithmetic can be used to design stabilizingrobust MPC controllers. Interval arithmetic provides a suitable framework to obtaina tractable procedure to calculate an outer bound <strong>of</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> a given nonlinearfunction. This can be used to calculate a guaranteed outer bound on the predictedsequence <strong>of</strong> reachable sets. This allows us to consider the effect <strong>of</strong> the uncertaintiesin the prediction <strong>and</strong> to formulate robust dual-mode MPC controllers with ensuredadmissibility <strong>and</strong> convergence. Interval arithmetic can also be used to estimate thestate when only outputs are measurable. This method provides a guaranteed outerbound on the set <strong>of</strong> states consistent with the output measurements. Generalizing thecontrollers based on reachable sets, a novel robust output feedback MPC controller isalso proposed.1 IntroductionConsider a process described by an uncertain nonlinear time-invariant discretetime modelx + = f(x, u, w) (1)y = g(x, u, v) (2)where x ∈ R n is the system state, u ∈ R m is the current control vector, y ∈ R pis the measured output, w ∈ R nw is the disturbance input which models theuncertainty, v ∈ R pv is the measurement noise <strong>and</strong> x + is the successor state. x k ,u k , y k , w k <strong>and</strong> v k denote the state, input, output, uncertainty <strong>and</strong> noise <strong>of</strong> theplant at sampling time k, respectively.It is assumed that the uncertainty is bounded <strong>and</strong> contained in a compactset,w ∈ W (3)which contains the origin <strong>and</strong> the noise is bounded in the compact setv ∈ V. (4)R. Findeisen et al. (Eds.): <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Future</strong> <strong>Directions</strong>, LNCIS 358, pp. 317–326, 2007.springerlink.com c○ Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!