13.07.2015 Views

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Integration <strong>of</strong> Economical Optimization <strong>and</strong> Control 431LF M , RFCκ C sRecycle monomerκ V RTCooling waterRecycle tank holdup V RTRecycletankSolvent concentration C STC0F C,inCatalystτF 4C,inUF R,outτ 4,in F MFresh monomerQLCSeparationReactor outlet F R , outMolecular weight M WQConversionµPolymerκ µdesout R F ,κ F R , outDownstreamProcessingFig. 8. Process schematic with the NCO tracking controllers <strong>and</strong> triggersin the solution model are implemented using the controllers K as depicted inFigure 8. In this study, PI-type controllers are used employing the nominal inputpr<strong>of</strong>iles as feedforward terms. Advanced controllers could also be used forimproved tracking performance (cf. Section 2.2 <strong>and</strong> [6]). In the designed controlsuperstructure, depending upon the state <strong>of</strong> the process, one controller overridesthe other. In the classic process control terminology, this type <strong>of</strong> control structureis referred to as overriding or signal-select controller [14]. Reliable on-linemeasurements or estimates <strong>of</strong> the constrained variables are necessary for implementingthe NCO tracking strategy using the superstructure solution model.A considerable amount <strong>of</strong> uncertainty due to different than nominal initialconditions <strong>and</strong> reactor solvent concentration is present in practice. The proposedNCO tracking superstructure for optimal grade transition is tested forits performance in the presence <strong>of</strong> uncertainty using the simulated plant model.The PI controllers are tuned for the nominal case. The simulated NCO trackingpr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> fresh monomer flowrate F M,in <strong>and</strong> polymer molecular weight M Ware depicted by dash-dotted lines in Figure 9. The transition time t f for theuncertainty case is considerably larger than that for the nominal case, which iscalculated on-line in simulation by using the solution model. The performance<strong>of</strong> the NCO tracking solution is compared to a robust solution <strong>and</strong> optimizationwith known uncertainty in Table 2. The robust solution (column 2 <strong>of</strong> Table 2)represents a single strategy computed <strong>of</strong>f-line which is feasible for both the nominal<strong>and</strong> perturbed cases. Such an approach is <strong>of</strong>ten used in industrial practiceto avoid real-time optimization. The NCO tracking approach (column 3 <strong>of</strong>Table 2) is computed using the decentralized control structure presented inFigure 9. Finally, the numerical optimal solution (column 4 <strong>of</strong> Table 2) correspondsto the best possible solution that can be computed using full knowledge<strong>of</strong> the uncertainty. Table 2 shows that the robust solution is rather poor. In

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!