13.07.2015 Views

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Techniques for Uniting Lyapunov-Based <strong>and</strong> <strong>Model</strong> <strong>Predictive</strong> Control 87<strong>of</strong> the Lyapunov function, leading to stability. Lyapunov-based predictive controlapproaches (see, for example, [16]) typically incorporate a similar Lyapunovfunction decay constraint, albeit requiring the constraint <strong>of</strong> Eq.18 to hold atthe end <strong>of</strong> the prediction horizon as opposed to only the first time step. Aninput trajectory that only requires the value <strong>of</strong> the Lyapunov function value todecrease at the end <strong>of</strong> the horizon may involve the state trajectory leaving thelevel set (<strong>and</strong>, therefore, possibly out <strong>of</strong> the state constraint satisfaction region,violating the state constraints), <strong>and</strong> motivates using a constraint that requiresthe Lyapunov function to decrease during the first time step (this also facilitatesthe explicit characterization <strong>of</strong> the feasibility region).Remark 6. For 0 ∆ ∗ , i.e., greater than what a givenbounded control design can tolerate (<strong>and</strong>, therefore, greater than the maximumallowable discretization for the Lyapunov-based predictive controller), it is necessaryto redesign the bounded controller to increase the robustness margin, <strong>and</strong>generate a revised estimate <strong>of</strong> the feasibility (<strong>and</strong> stability) region under the predictivecontroller. A larger value <strong>of</strong> ∆ ∗ may be achieved by increasing the value<strong>of</strong> the parameter ρ in the design <strong>of</strong> the bounded controller. If the value <strong>of</strong> thesampling time is reasonable, an increase in the value <strong>of</strong> the parameter ρ, whileleading to a shrinkage in the stability region estimate, can increase ∆ ∗ to a valuegreater than ∆ s <strong>and</strong> preserve the desired feasibility <strong>and</strong> stability guarantees <strong>of</strong>the Lyapunov-based predictive controller.4.3 Switched Systems with Scheduled Mode TransitionsIn many chemical processes, the system is required to follow a prescribed switchingschedule, where the switching times are prescribed via an operating schedule.This practical problem motivated the development <strong>of</strong> a predictive control frameworkfor the constrained stabilization <strong>of</strong> switched nonlinear processes that transitbetween their modes <strong>of</strong> operation at prescribed switching times [23]. We considerthe class <strong>of</strong> switched nonlinear systems represented by the following state-spacedescriptionẋ(t) =f σ(t) (x(t)) + g σ(t) (x(t))u σ(t) (t)(21)u σ(t) ∈U σ ; σ(t) ∈K := {1, ··· ,p}

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!