13.07.2015 Views

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

State Estimation Analysed as Inverse Problem 339For linear model equations the corresponding operator K is affine. Let us firstconsider linear K, i.e. the model equations are linear <strong>and</strong> p <strong>and</strong> u = 0. Withoutloss <strong>of</strong> generality we consider in the rest <strong>of</strong> the paper only the case t 0 =0.Thuswe have withẋ − Ax =0, x(0) = x 0 , y − Cx =0 (3)⇒ Kx 0 = Ce At x 0 (4)Choosing now as norm on Y the L 2 ([0,H]) ny -norm we obtain∫‖Kx 0 ‖ 2 L 2= x T H0 0 (eAt ) T C T Ce At dt x 0 = x T 0 G(H)x 0where the matrix G(H) ∈ IR nx×nx is the known finite time observability Gramian(e.g. [6, 11, 12]).Lemma 1. Let the system be observable, then:a.) The observability Gramian G(H) = ∫ H0 (eAt ) T C T Ce At dt ∈ IR nx×nx is symmetricpositive definite, <strong>and</strong> therefore invertible.b.) Let v be a normed real eigenvalue <strong>of</strong> A to an eigenvalue α ∈ IR.Then‖G(H)‖ 2is large for large α <strong>and</strong> for a long horizon [0,H], while‖G(H) −1 ‖ 2 is large if −αis large or ‖Cv‖ l2 is small or if the horizon is short.Pro<strong>of</strong>: a.) Symmetry is obvious. Given v ≠0theny(t) =Ce At v ≢ 0sincethesystem is observable. Hence, v T Gv = ∫ H0 yT (t)y(t) dt = ‖y‖ 2 L 2> 0.b.) Let v <strong>and</strong> α fulfill the assumption, thenv T Gv = ‖e αt ‖ 2 L 2(0,H) ‖Cv‖2 l 2= e2αH − 1‖Cv‖ 2 l2α2. (5)With ||G|| 2 =max v∈IR nx (v T Gv)/(v T v), ‖G −1 ‖ 2 =max v∈IR nx (v T v)/(v T Gv) followsthe assertion.Using the l 2 -norm for X =IR nx it follows for K:‖K‖ 2 l 2→L 2=supx 0∈IR nx ‖Kx 0 ‖ 2 L 2‖x 0 ‖ 2 l 2= supx 0∈IR nx x T 0 Gx 0x T 0 x 0= ||G|| 2 (6)‖(K ∣ ∣ R(K) ) −1 ‖ 2 L 2→l 2= supx 0∈IR nx ‖x 0 ‖ 2 l 2‖Kx 0 ‖ 2 L 2= ||G −1 || 2 (7)For linear systems with not necessarily p <strong>and</strong> u = 0 we need to consider forthe condition numbers ‖K ˜x 0 − Kx 0 ‖ 2 L 2=(˜x 0 − x 0 ) T G(˜x 0 − x 0 ). Hence, having√‖G−1‖ 2 ‖y − ỹ‖ L2 ≥‖x 0 − ˜x 0 ‖ l2 for all x 0 , we can define for linear systems-like condition numbers for matrices- a observability measure independent <strong>of</strong> thestate x 0 :Definition 4. The absolute, respectively the relative observability measure withrespect to the l 2 <strong>and</strong> L 2 -norms for linear systems is given by1/ √ ||G −1 || 2 respectively 1/ √ cond(G).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!