13.07.2015 Views

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Experiences with <strong>Nonlinear</strong> MPC in PolymerManufacturingKelvin Naidoo, John Guiver, Paul Turner, Mike Keenan, <strong>and</strong> Michael HarmseAspen Technology Inc., 2500 City West Blvd, Suite 1600, Houston,Texas 77042, USAjohn.guiver@aspentech.comSummary. This paper discusses the implementation <strong>of</strong> nonlinear model predictivecontrol on continuous industrial polymer manufacturing processes. Two examples <strong>of</strong>such processes serve to highlight many <strong>of</strong> the practical issues faced <strong>and</strong> the technologicalsolutions that have been adopted. An outline is given <strong>of</strong> the various phases <strong>of</strong> deployingsuch a solution, <strong>and</strong> this serves as a framework for describing the relevant modelingchoices, controller structures, controller tuning, <strong>and</strong> other practical issues1 IntroductionStarting with a pilot implementation in 2001, Aspen Technology has gained alarge amount <strong>of</strong> experience in the field in implementing fully non-linear MPCon several different types <strong>of</strong> continuous polymer manufacturing processes. Thereare many benefits obtained by putting MPC on these industrial units, but one<strong>of</strong> the main goals is to minimize production <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-spec material both in steadystate operation <strong>and</strong> when transitioning from one product grade to another. Priorto 2001, implementations using empirical models were typically done with someform <strong>of</strong> gain adaptation or gain scheduling, which, though suitable for steadystate operation, is sub-optimal for transitions. This is due to the fact that processgains <strong>of</strong>ten change by an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude or more over a relatively shortperiod <strong>of</strong> time, <strong>and</strong> the non-linearities involved interact in a multivariate manner<strong>and</strong> cannot be removed by univariate transforms. Even if the gains are scheduledin a non-linear manner across the transition horizon [5], this does not take intoaccount these interactions, <strong>and</strong> no optimized path can be calculated. A breakthroughcame with the development <strong>of</strong> Bounded Derivative Network technology[6], which allowed the building <strong>of</strong> empirical, fast-executing, control-relevant modelsthat could be embedded directly in a nonlinear control law, removing the needfor gain scheduling completely.There are many practical matters that impact the success <strong>of</strong> a control projectincluding technology, process underst<strong>and</strong>ing, best-practice methodology, the use<strong>of</strong> reliable s<strong>of</strong>tware with suitable functionality, <strong>and</strong> developing a deep underst<strong>and</strong>ing<strong>of</strong> practical operational requirements. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper is totouch on many <strong>of</strong> these issues <strong>and</strong> share best practice concepts around howR. Findeisen et al. (Eds.): <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Future</strong> <strong>Directions</strong>, LNCIS 358, pp. 383–398, 2007.springerlink.com c○ Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!