13.07.2015 Views

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

314 H. Arellano-Garcia et al.The resulting trajectories <strong>of</strong> the reactor temperature concerning both strategiesare illustrated in Fig. 5. The figure shows, that the reactor temperatureresulted by the back-<strong>of</strong>f strategy reaches very early a stationary value caused byfixed bounds <strong>of</strong> the temperature formulated in the corresponding optimizationproblem. The temperature curve <strong>of</strong> the stochastic approach shows more drasticalchanges with lower values <strong>of</strong> temperatures in earlier parts <strong>of</strong> the diagram<strong>and</strong> higher values later. This is caused by the fact, that with the consideration<strong>of</strong> uncertainties in advance, also the change <strong>of</strong> sensitivities <strong>of</strong> uncertain parameterstowards the reactor temperature can be taken into consideration by thestochastic approach. At the beginning in the diagram, the stochastic approachrealizes the matching <strong>of</strong> a more conservative strategy to higher sensitivities, <strong>and</strong>thus the operation achieves more robustness than the one achieved by the back<strong>of</strong>fstrategy. At the end <strong>of</strong> the curves, the decrease <strong>of</strong> sensitivities is used for acloser approach to the maximum temperature <strong>and</strong> thus leads to a better objectivevalue. Therefore, the strategy leads to an improvement <strong>of</strong> both, robustness<strong>and</strong> the objective value.5 ConclusionsThe chance constrained optimization framework has been demonstrated to bepromising to address optimization <strong>and</strong> control problems under uncertainties.Feasibility <strong>and</strong> robustness with respect to input <strong>and</strong> output constraints havebeen achieved by the proposed approach. Thus, the solution <strong>of</strong> the problemhas the feature <strong>of</strong> prediction, robustness <strong>and</strong> being closed-loop. The resultingNMPC scheme embedded in the on-line re-optimization framework is viable forthe optimization <strong>of</strong> the reactor recipe while simultaneously guaranteeing theconstraints compliance, both for nominal operation as well as for cases <strong>of</strong> largedisturbances e.g. failure situation. In fact, the approach is relevant to all caseswhen uncertainty can be described by any kind <strong>of</strong> joint correlated multivariatedistribution function. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support<strong>of</strong> the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).References[1] O. Abel <strong>and</strong> W. Marquardt. Scenario-integrated on-line optimization <strong>of</strong> batchreactors. Journal <strong>of</strong> Process Control, 13:703–715, 2003.[2] H. Arellano-G., W. Martini, M. Wendt, P. Li, <strong>and</strong> G. Wozny. Chance constrainedbatch distillation process optimization under uncertainty. In I.E. Grossmann<strong>and</strong> C.M. McDonald, editors, FOCAPO 2003 - fourth International Conferenceon Foundations <strong>of</strong> Computer-Aided Process Operations, pages 609–612. CACHE,CAST Division, AICHE, 2003.[3] H. Arellano-Garcia, W. Martini, M. Wendt, <strong>and</strong> G. Wozny. A New OptimizationFramework for Dynamic Systems under Uncertainty. Computer-Aided ChemicalEngineering, 18:553–559, 2004.[4] J. H. Lee <strong>and</strong> Z. H. Yu. Worst-case formulations <strong>of</strong> model predictive control forsystems with bounded parameters. Automatica, 33:765–781, 1997.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!