13.07.2015 Views

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

Assessment and Future Directions of Nonlinear Model Predictive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

562 S. Gros et al.5 ConclusionThis paper has proposed a two-time-scale control scheme that uses repeated trajectorygeneration in a slow loop <strong>and</strong> time-varying linear feedback based on theneighboring-extremal approach in a faster loop. The slow loop provides reasonablereference trajectories, while the fast loop ensures robustness. Feedforwardtrajectory generation is obtained using flatness-based system inversion.The two-time-scale approach as well as MPC have been used in simulationto control a VTOL flying structure. Though the simplified model <strong>of</strong> the structureis flat, control based on feedback linearization is not appropriate because itlacks robustness with respect to the model uncertainties typically encountered inVTOL structures. MPC requires a high re-optimization frequency <strong>and</strong>, in addition,cannot accommodate large model uncertainties. In contrast, the proposedtwo-time-scale control scheme is sufficiently robust that it does not require recalculation<strong>of</strong> the reference trajectories. The flatness-based approach is very fast,<strong>and</strong> will be used for experimental implementation on a laboratory-scale VTOLstructure, for which re-generation <strong>of</strong> the reference trajectories may be necessary.References[1] Bemporad, A. (1998). Reducing conservatism in predictive control <strong>of</strong> constrainedsystems with disturbances. In: 37th IEEE Control <strong>and</strong> Decision Conference.Tampa, FL. pp. 1384–89.[2] Bemporad, A. <strong>and</strong> M. Morari (1999). Robust <strong>Model</strong> <strong>Predictive</strong> Control: A Survey.Springer Verlag.[3] Bryson, A. E. (1999). Dynamic Optimization. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, California[4] Camacho, E. <strong>and</strong> Bordons C. (2005). <strong>Nonlinear</strong> <strong>Model</strong> <strong>Predictive</strong> Control: anIntroductory Survey NMPC05, Freudenstadt, Germany[5] Christ<strong>of</strong>ides, P.D. <strong>and</strong> Daoutidis P. (1996). Feedback Control <strong>of</strong> Two-Time-Scale<strong>Nonlinear</strong> Systems International Journal <strong>of</strong> Control. 63, 965–994[6] DeHaan D. <strong>and</strong> Guay M. (2005). A New Real-Time Method for <strong>Nonlinear</strong> <strong>Model</strong><strong>Predictive</strong> Control NMPC05, Freudenstadt, Germany[7] Fliess, M., J. Lévine, Ph. Martin <strong>and</strong> P. Rouchon (1995) Flatness <strong>and</strong> defect <strong>of</strong>nonlinear systems: Introductory theory <strong>and</strong> examples International Journal <strong>of</strong>Control 61(6), 1327–1361.[8] Fliess, M., J. Lévine, Ph. Martin <strong>and</strong> P. Rouchon (1999). A Lie-Bäcklund approachto equivalence <strong>and</strong> flatness <strong>of</strong> nonlinear systems IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr.38, 700–716.[9] Gros, S. (2005). <strong>Model</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> control <strong>of</strong> a vtol structure. Internal Report.Laboratoire d’Automatique, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne[10] Hagenmeyer V. <strong>and</strong> Delaleau E. (2003). Exact feedforward linearization based ondifferential flatness International Journal <strong>of</strong> Control 76, 573–556.[11] Kouvaritakis, B., J. A. Rossiter <strong>and</strong> J. Schuurmans (2000). Efficient robust predictivecontrol. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 45(8), 1545–49.[12] Lee, J. H. <strong>and</strong> Z. Yu (1997). Worst-case formulations <strong>of</strong> model-predictive controlfor systems with bounded parameters. Automatica 33(5), 763–781.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!