THE FUNDAMENTAL RULES OF THE TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT

(Director of Medical Services Letter P. No. 159-E1/50, dated 9th September 1950, to the Accountant-General, Madras and Finance Memorandum No.11596-C.S.R., dated 14th March 1952.)APPENDIX II.PART III.Matters relating to All-India Service Officers, High Court Judges, etc.[F.R.—13 and 14-A—Ruling.]An Officer of the former Secretary of State Services holding substantively a permanent post shallretain a lien on that post while on refused leave granted after the date of retirement under Rule 86and it shall not be terminated during such leave.[F.R.—19—Ruling (13).]In the case of re-employment of Officers who before their retirement were under the rule-makingcontrol of the President of the Republic of India, the authority competent to fix the pay and allowancesof the appointment in which they are employed can decide whether the pension is to be held wholly orpartly in abeyance or not.[F.R.—26(b)—Ruling (3).]Periods of overstayal should be excluded in determining the “year of service” for purposes ofSchedule I of the Superior Civil Services Rules.(Letter No.T.1091-A/90-35, dated the 2nd September 1935 from the Comptroller and AuditorGeneral to the Accountant-General, Madras.)[F.R.—26(b)—Ruling (8).]“Year of service” in Schedule I of the Superior Civil Services (Revision of Pay, Passage andPension) Rules, 1924 shall be interpreted as excluding period of extraordinary leave, unless theGovernment of India or the State Government as the case may be, being satisfied that the leave wastaken on account of illness or for any other cause beyond the Government servants control, otherwisedirects.(G.O.No.172, Finance, dated 8th March 1927.)[F.R.27—Note.]Note.—In the case of officers promoted to All-India and Imperial services, whose pay is suchservice is fixed with reference to the pay drawn to them before the promotion in a provincial or otherservice cases may arise of an officer drawing less pay for a portion each year than an officer junior tohim subsequently promoted to the same service. The Secretary of State has empowered theGovernment of India in such cases to grant an advance increment of pay to the senior officerconcerned.(Government of India No.544, E-A., dated 7th June 1922, G.O.No.635, Finance, dated 26th July1922.)[F.R. 30—Ruling (4).]In relation to an officer of All-India Service the second proviso to Rule 30 no longer subsists beinginconsistent with the Government of India Act, 1935.(Comptroller and Auditor-General’s U.O. Note No.1-8A/203-407, dated 14th January 1941.)Additional remuneration to High Court Judges.[F.R. 46—Ruling (2).]It is not desirable that Judges of the High Court should undertake for remuneration, work inaddition to their duties as Judges. They should not therefore, accept fees for examining.[Memo. No.26-2, Public (Special), dated 28th February 1935.][F.R.46—Ruling (3).]320