13.07.2015 Views

Final evaluation Netherlands participation in ISAF 2006 - 2010

Final evaluation Netherlands participation in ISAF 2006 - 2010

Final evaluation Netherlands participation in ISAF 2006 - 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Apart from facilitat<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and mentor<strong>in</strong>g, the <strong>Netherlands</strong> set up anumber of <strong>in</strong>frastructure projects for the police force <strong>in</strong> Uruzgan, such ascheckpo<strong>in</strong>ts and police stations. The <strong>Netherlands</strong> built a police tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gcentre on the periphery of Kamp Holland <strong>in</strong> Tar<strong>in</strong> Kowt so that policeofficers could be tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> their home prov<strong>in</strong>ce. The <strong>in</strong>structors at thiscentre were from the TFU and EUPOL. From March 2008, Dutch EUPOLtra<strong>in</strong>ers were also active <strong>in</strong> Tar<strong>in</strong> Kowt. S<strong>in</strong>ce the open<strong>in</strong>g of the centre <strong>in</strong>March 2009, over 800 police officers have completed basic tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. That isover half of the total number of police officers now active <strong>in</strong> Uruzgan. The<strong>Netherlands</strong> also contributed to ‘on-the-job’ tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g by deploy<strong>in</strong>g PoliceMentor<strong>in</strong>g Teams to the area <strong>in</strong> late 2008. Initially, the <strong>Netherlands</strong> sentthree teams, a number that was <strong>in</strong>creased to five <strong>in</strong> 2009. The deploymentof these teams led to clear further improvement of the quality of the policeforce.An additional tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programme, led by <strong>ISAF</strong>, was conducted for theAfghan police per prov<strong>in</strong>ce. Local police units be<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong>ed weretemporarily replaced by Afghan police units from other prov<strong>in</strong>ces. Despitethese efforts, the police apparatus rema<strong>in</strong>ed a weak l<strong>in</strong>k <strong>in</strong> the Afghansecurity system. A 2009 <strong>evaluation</strong> 13 stated that the quality of the Afghanpolice force was lagg<strong>in</strong>g far beh<strong>in</strong>d the quantity. The <strong>Netherlands</strong> thereforepressed for good coord<strong>in</strong>ation between the LOFTA and other contributors,for an <strong>in</strong>tensification of LOFTA <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> capacity-build<strong>in</strong>g at theM<strong>in</strong>istry of the Interior, and for an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the quality of the police force.Steps have been taken, but <strong>in</strong> comparison to the army, the capabilities ofthe police force <strong>in</strong> Uruzgan rema<strong>in</strong>ed weak. Corruption <strong>in</strong> the Afghan policeforce is still a major problem and this is reflected <strong>in</strong> the local people’sperception of the police. The army is respected and appreciated more thanthe police force. Local people often still see the police as be<strong>in</strong>g badly tra<strong>in</strong>edand ill-mannered and does not feel that the police is protect<strong>in</strong>g their<strong>in</strong>terests.4.3.8 International cooperation4.3.8.1 Lead nationIn the <strong>2006</strong>-<strong>2010</strong> period, the <strong>Netherlands</strong> was lead nation <strong>in</strong> Uruzgan. Theassociated tasks, powers and responsibilities lay primarily <strong>in</strong> the area oflogistics. As lead nation, the <strong>Netherlands</strong> was the largest supplier of troopsand the facilitator of much of the logistic and <strong>in</strong>frastructure activities <strong>in</strong> theprov<strong>in</strong>ce. However, Dutch mission command was not solely responsible forsecurity <strong>in</strong> the whole prov<strong>in</strong>ce. Various partners, such as <strong>ISAF</strong> and OEF,acted <strong>in</strong>dependently of the <strong>Netherlands</strong> <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. In most cases, butnot all, such activities were discussed, and if possible coord<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong>advance with Dutch military command. In practice, the TFU was unable toenforce that coord<strong>in</strong>ation with partners but had to depend on theirwill<strong>in</strong>gness to cooperate. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the mission, much time was <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong>good coord<strong>in</strong>ation and cooperation with partners and, despite sometimescontrast<strong>in</strong>g views and approaches, it can be said that activities of partnersdid not lead to real conflicts with the TFU’s operations and activities.However, contrast<strong>in</strong>g views regard<strong>in</strong>g the approach to tackl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formalleaders (see paragraph 4.4.3) did form an obstacle <strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g aneffective policy aimed at restrict<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>fluence of power brokers andwarlords.13 TLO: Three Years Later, 2009Page 45 of 133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!