13.07.2015 Views

Final evaluation Netherlands participation in ISAF 2006 - 2010

Final evaluation Netherlands participation in ISAF 2006 - 2010

Final evaluation Netherlands participation in ISAF 2006 - 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

this situation as constra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, for it made it impossible for all additionalrequirements to be met. The commanders on location therefore had to setpriorities dur<strong>in</strong>g deployment.Compared to earlier missions, the deployment of the TFU <strong>in</strong>volved arelatively large number of civilian personnel, although it may seem limitedwhen set aga<strong>in</strong>st the number of military personnel. The number of civilianrepresentatives of the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Foreign Affairs grew substantially dur<strong>in</strong>gthe course of the mission. At the outset of the mission, there were threeofficials from Foreign Affairs: one political adviser (POLAD), onedevelopment cooperation adviser (OSAD) and one cultural adviser (CULAD).The civilian team from Foreign Affairs was expanded with a CivilRepresentative (CIVREP) <strong>in</strong> the summer of 2007, and several extra POLADsand OSADs were added later. By the end of the mission, their number hadquadrupled to 12 civilian personnel per rotation. In addition to thediplomats from the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Foreign Affairs, the civilian personnelcomprised functional specialists (reserve officers), militarised <strong>in</strong>terpretersand other militarised civilian personnel.Between <strong>2006</strong> and <strong>2010</strong>, a total of 130 civil servants of the M<strong>in</strong>istry ofForeign Affairs were directly <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Netherlands</strong>’ mission <strong>in</strong>Uruzgan. A total of over 60 civilian personnel participated <strong>in</strong> six-monthlyrotations <strong>in</strong> the Uruzgan PRT as POLADs, CULADs, OSADs or <strong>in</strong>terpreters.Dur<strong>in</strong>g the mission, the composition and the number of officials constitut<strong>in</strong>gthe PRT changed several times. The staff<strong>in</strong>g of the political and socioeconomicdepartment of the embassy <strong>in</strong> Kabul was also doubled because ofthe mission. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the second half of the deployment (2008-<strong>2010</strong>), acounternarcotics adviser from the M<strong>in</strong>istry of the Interior and K<strong>in</strong>gdomRelations jo<strong>in</strong>ed the civilian team of the mission. From <strong>2006</strong>, a politicaladviser was posted to the <strong>ISAF</strong> regional headquarters at Kandahar Airfieldevery six months, as a strategic detachment and also <strong>in</strong> the context of theperiods <strong>in</strong> which the <strong>Netherlands</strong> held command of RC-S.Besides the deployment <strong>in</strong> TFU and ATF, Dutch personnel were alsodeployed to the <strong>ISAF</strong> Headquarters, the IJC <strong>in</strong> Kabul, and the RC-S atKandahar Airfield. Dutch flag and general officers filled a number of<strong>in</strong>fluential positions. The Dutch deployment for <strong>ISAF</strong> was supported bylogistic detachments stationed at Kandahar Airfield and <strong>in</strong> the UAE.5.3.1.2 Work-up phaseDutch service personnel are generically and organically (mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> unitswith fixed compositions and under the command of their own staffs) tra<strong>in</strong>edto the “Operationally Ready” level. For the mission <strong>in</strong> Uruzgan, the TaskForce was chosen as the form of deployment. For its specific task <strong>in</strong>Uruzgan, this Task Force was formed as a composite unit, built up fromorganic entities and additional elements (for <strong>in</strong>stance, a comb<strong>in</strong>ation ofarmoured and airmobile <strong>in</strong>fantry and mar<strong>in</strong>es). This ad hoc compositionmeant that str<strong>in</strong>gent requirements were imposed on the preparations <strong>in</strong> thework-up phase <strong>in</strong> order to achieve the “Operationally Ready” level. Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gpersonnel to perform non-organic tasks and to work with non-organicmateriel, the limited availability of the equipment to be used <strong>in</strong> Uruzgan(e.g. Bushmasters and night-vision equipment), and <strong>in</strong>tegration of thecomposite unit comb<strong>in</strong>ed to form a great challenge.In the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the mission, the work-up paths of civilian and militarypersonnel were largely separate. But before long it was acknowledged thata collective work-up would be beneficial to performance <strong>in</strong> the field. As themission progressed, efforts were made to improve the coord<strong>in</strong>ation of bothPage 89 of 133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!