5.1.1 HGISThe greater part of the expenditure for the mission <strong>in</strong> Afghanistan, aroundEUR 1.6 billion, was funded from the HGIS budget. The HGIS budget wasestablished <strong>in</strong> 1997 and is a permanent provision with<strong>in</strong> the NationalBudget for the fund<strong>in</strong>g of the government’s <strong>in</strong>ternational cooperation. Thiscomprehensive approach, with the M<strong>in</strong>ister of Foreign Affairs act<strong>in</strong>g as acoord<strong>in</strong>ator, enhances the cohesion and cooperation required for an<strong>in</strong>tegrated and coherent foreign policy. This arrangement means thatvarious m<strong>in</strong>istries have HGIS budgets <strong>in</strong>cluded separately <strong>in</strong> their overallbudgets.5.1.1.1 HGIS expenditure, M<strong>in</strong>istry of DefenceHGIS has a permanent provision for additional expenditure by the armedforces for crisis-management operations. This provision is part of theDefence budget and is known as policy article 20, ‘Conduct of crisismanagementoperations’. This provision is reserved for the possibledeployment of the Defence organisation <strong>in</strong> current and future missions. Theprovision is to ensure that missions do not weigh on the funds <strong>in</strong> theDefence budget which are reserved for the regular day-to-day runn<strong>in</strong>g ofthe armed forces. These regular funds are for the read<strong>in</strong>ess andsusta<strong>in</strong>ment of the armed forces. The funds for missions from HGIS areadditional funds. The costs which the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Defence can charge to theHGIS budget are costs which would not have been <strong>in</strong>curred if there hadbeen no deployment. Examples <strong>in</strong>clude the allowance which militarypersonnel receive while they are on deployment, food, accommodation,transport to and from the mission area, fuel consumption <strong>in</strong> the missionarea and materiel ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, the HGIS budget only coversrunn<strong>in</strong>g costs, not <strong>in</strong>vestment costs. That means that the purchase of newmateriel is charged to the <strong>in</strong>vestment budget <strong>in</strong> the regular Defencebudget.Expenditure covered by the HGIS budget for the armed forces’ <strong>participation</strong><strong>in</strong> Afghanistan amounted to around EUR 1.2 billion <strong>in</strong> the <strong>2006</strong>-<strong>2010</strong> period.Page 80 of 133
Overview of long-term expenditure and receipts <strong>in</strong> the HGIS budget for the M<strong>in</strong>istryof Defence for <strong>ISAF</strong>, <strong>2006</strong>-<strong>2010</strong>. 28HGIS provision for 'Conduct of<strong>2006</strong>crisis-management operations'2007 2008 2009 <strong>2010</strong> TotalExpenditure for <strong>ISAF</strong> stage III 143,943 232,566 285,600 315,607 203,698 1,181,414Allowances and pension premiums 44,337 73,229 81,267 95,301 54,309 348,443Personnel expenditure 14,446 41,610 45,961 41,902 28,701 172,619Materiel expenditure 2,235 6,469 8,003 7,480 5,618 29,806Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance 13,151 22,035 26,588 33,394 31,247 126,415Transport 47,316 41,228 49,903 60,253 30,865 229,565Infrastructure 8,636 13,892 20,992 16,527 13,227 73,210Data and communication 3,154 4,756 2,829 2,757 3,994 17,489Fuel, oil and lubricants 2,081 5,227 12,732 15,396 9,206 44,692Ammunition 7,530 21,003 33,610 21,732 12,420 97,295Other 1,057 3,130 3,716 20,865 13,112 41,880National contribution to <strong>ISAF</strong>staffs, Aug <strong>2010</strong> – Dec <strong>2010</strong> 4,754 4,754RDTF expenditure 64,146 64,146Receipts for <strong>ISAF</strong> stage III 0 0 6,330 16,456 0 22,786TOTAL 143,943 232,566 279,270 299,151 272,598 1.227,528Amounts x € 1,000Rise <strong>in</strong> expenditure and <strong>in</strong>itial estimatesWhen an Article 100 letter is drawn up, an <strong>in</strong>itial estimate is made on thebasis of the parameters, experience data and key <strong>in</strong>dicators which areknown at that time. The actual expenditure covered by HGIS for thedeployment of the <strong>Netherlands</strong> armed forces <strong>in</strong> Afghanistan turned out tobe significantly higher than the estimates. For the period from August <strong>2006</strong>to August <strong>2010</strong>, there was a discrepancy of around EUR 300 million.Overview of estimate versus actual expenditure, 1 August <strong>2006</strong> – 1 August <strong>2010</strong> (exclud<strong>in</strong>gRDTF).EstimateActualexpenditureDiscrepancy2005: <strong>2006</strong> - 2008 320,000 580,000 260,0002007: 2008 - <strong>2010</strong> 540,000 580,000 40,000Total 300,000Amounts x € 1,000In the Article 100 letter of December 2005, HGIS expenditure for thedeployment of the armed forces for <strong>ISAF</strong> up to 1 August 2008 wasestimated to amount to between EUR 300 million and EUR 340 million. Thema<strong>in</strong> components <strong>in</strong> this estimate were the payments and allowances formilitary personnel on deployment, personnel expenditure, <strong>in</strong>frastructureand transport. When the estimate was made, the latter two items <strong>in</strong>particular were subject to a number of uncerta<strong>in</strong> factors; the plansregard<strong>in</strong>g transport and the construction of <strong>in</strong>frastructure still needed to beworked out <strong>in</strong> greater detail. A large-scale, complex mission such as that <strong>in</strong>28 This account is based on the f<strong>in</strong>ancial accounts <strong>in</strong> the annual reports of the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Defence, but for thepurpose of this <strong>evaluation</strong> they have been specified further.Page 81 of 133
- Page 1 and 2:
Final evaluationNetherlands contrib
- Page 3 and 4:
High mountainsLow mountainsPlains a
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of ContentsDutch military per
- Page 7 and 8:
Dutch military personnel deceased i
- Page 9 and 10:
Page 9 of 133
- Page 11 and 12:
1 IntroductionThe government would,
- Page 13 and 14:
The structure of the final evaluati
- Page 15 and 16:
2 The international presence in Afg
- Page 17 and 18:
insurgents in, particularly, the ea
- Page 19 and 20:
3 Netherlands policy for participat
- Page 21 and 22:
Netherlands’ presence. Furthermor
- Page 23 and 24:
“The objectives of this stabilisa
- Page 25 and 26:
In December 2005, the Netherlands g
- Page 27 and 28:
The expectation is that meaningful
- Page 29 and 30: 3.6.2 Implementation of national pr
- Page 31 and 32: 4 Implementation of the mission and
- Page 33 and 34: tasks to fulfil in the area of secu
- Page 35 and 36: such as the Bushmaster, that was be
- Page 37 and 38: Afghan partner unit, at all times o
- Page 39 and 40: northern part of Deh Rawod in 2007.
- Page 41 and 42: in large and small bases, while con
- Page 43 and 44: previously thought and comprised a
- Page 45 and 46: Apart from facilitating training an
- Page 47 and 48: If operations in close proximity of
- Page 49 and 50: As previously mentioned, the preven
- Page 51 and 52: - Between 2006 and 2010, the number
- Page 53 and 54: government of Chora in January 2010
- Page 55 and 56: At the beginning of the Dutch missi
- Page 57 and 58: intermediary of TLO and political a
- Page 59 and 60: interest for filling judicial posit
- Page 61 and 62: During the Uruzgan mission, a great
- Page 63 and 64: structurally change governance in U
- Page 65 and 66: development programmes. Before the
- Page 67 and 68: also the way in which Afghans perce
- Page 69 and 70: tailored to the real needs of the p
- Page 71 and 72: Gizab had increased and there was a
- Page 73 and 74: The DCU programme devoted and still
- Page 75 and 76: purpose of these loans, cooperative
- Page 77 and 78: In view of the lack of enthusiasm a
- Page 79: 5 Expenditure for the mission and i
- Page 83 and 84: expenditure related to the deployme
- Page 85 and 86: Multi-year expenditure, Foreign Aff
- Page 87 and 88: explosive ordnance disposal, armour
- Page 89 and 90: this situation as constraining, for
- Page 91 and 92: organised at a later stage. In addi
- Page 93 and 94: occupational social workers and the
- Page 95 and 96: Mercedes Benz terrain vehicle, the
- Page 97 and 98: 6 ConclusionsThis chapter begins wi
- Page 99 and 100: The first part of the central quest
- Page 101 and 102: At the end of 2005, the Afghan auth
- Page 103 and 104: province. This, too, was done by me
- Page 105 and 106: area, increased sales of agricultur
- Page 107 and 108: ISAF and the OEF led to extra coord
- Page 109 and 110: d. The recommendations from advisor
- Page 111 and 112: Page 111 of 133
- Page 113 and 114: Annex A, Afghanistan Compact Benchm
- Page 115 and 116: end-2010, reforms will strengthen t
- Page 117 and 118: Afghan Cultural HeritageA comprehen
- Page 119 and 120: Private Sector Development and Trad
- Page 121 and 122: Annex B, Results of the socio-econo
- Page 123 and 124: EducationTLO data:• In 2006 there
- Page 125 and 126: Overview of the number of children
- Page 127 and 128: Annex C, Chronology200522 December:
- Page 129 and 130: July: microcredit provider World Co
- Page 131 and 132:
Annex D, List of abbreviations3DADZ
- Page 133:
Page 133 of 133