13.07.2015 Views

Final evaluation Netherlands participation in ISAF 2006 - 2010

Final evaluation Netherlands participation in ISAF 2006 - 2010

Final evaluation Netherlands participation in ISAF 2006 - 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

At the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the Dutch mission, the <strong>Netherlands</strong> <strong>in</strong>sisted that he giveup his position as governor on account of his violent and corrupt past. Hisdeparture was a condition for deployment of the Dutch mission <strong>in</strong> Uruzgan.Jan Mohammed Khan was eventually forced to resign by President Karzai,but did, however, reta<strong>in</strong> a great deal of <strong>in</strong>fluence over day-to-day affairs <strong>in</strong>Uruzgan from a position beh<strong>in</strong>d the scenes. He was, together with hiscous<strong>in</strong> Matiullah Khan, the most important power broker <strong>in</strong> Uruzgan. Dutchpolicy regard<strong>in</strong>g these two power brokers of ill repute was to avoid<strong>in</strong>tensive cooperation with them. However, <strong>in</strong> practical terms, the issue ofavoid<strong>in</strong>g do<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess with these power brokers turned out to be anextremely complex matter.The ma<strong>in</strong> effort of the mission was primarily <strong>in</strong> support of the legitimateAfghan government. The activities of, for example, warlord Matiullah Khancould potentially have contributed to creat<strong>in</strong>g a certa<strong>in</strong> form of security,albeit that his activities were not necessarily aimed at strengthen<strong>in</strong>g officialAfghan government authority but more at strengthen<strong>in</strong>g his own position ofpower. It was also known that, <strong>in</strong> the past, Matiullah Khan, together withJan Mohammed Khan, had marg<strong>in</strong>alised large parts of the population. Forthat reason, the <strong>Netherlands</strong> was of the op<strong>in</strong>ion that the <strong>in</strong>fluence ofMatiullah Khan and Jan Mohammed Khan should be used <strong>in</strong> a controlledway. That could only be done if the two power brokers were prepared torecognise the authority of the local government and take <strong>in</strong>to account thewishes and vision of all population groups and tribes when carry<strong>in</strong>g outtheir activities. A policy was adopted of only work<strong>in</strong>g with Matiullah Khan ifhe was under Afghan government leadership. The <strong>Netherlands</strong> also decidednot to take part <strong>in</strong> shura meet<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>itiated and organised by MatiullahKhan. The <strong>Netherlands</strong> urged <strong>ISAF</strong> partners to follow the same course ofaction.The <strong>Netherlands</strong> also made efforts to <strong>in</strong>tegrate Matiullah Khan’s men <strong>in</strong>tothe formal Afghan police force structures. From 2007 onwards, MatiullahKhan’s men (the Kandak Amniante Uruzgan –KAU) no longer had anyformal raison d’être and should have been part of the Afghan police force.In practice, Matiullah Khan’s men operated as a militia group, check<strong>in</strong>gtraffic on the most important roads <strong>in</strong> and out of Uruzgan and generat<strong>in</strong>ghigh revenues for the warlord <strong>in</strong> the process. This militia group was notunder supervision of the Afghan government. Unfortunately, at the nationallevel, there was too little Afghan political will and drive to br<strong>in</strong>g MatiullahKhan’s militia to an end, leav<strong>in</strong>g him complete freedom of action to followhis own path and carry on with his activities.Despite this, the policy implemented by the <strong>Netherlands</strong> did result <strong>in</strong>w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g the confidence of other tribes that had previously beenmarg<strong>in</strong>alised. These disadvantaged tribes had <strong>in</strong> the past often soughtsupport from the Taliban <strong>in</strong> their tribal struggle aga<strong>in</strong>st the power of thePopolzai tribe of Jan Mohammed Khan and Matiullah Khan. As the presenceof and protection afforded by Dutch troops gave them the opportunity toonce aga<strong>in</strong> get <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> local governance, the support of suchdisadvantaged tribes for the Taliban gradually, but noticeably, started todim<strong>in</strong>ish.One problem with the str<strong>in</strong>gent Dutch policy towards power brokers wasthat it did not allow the Dutch mission leadership to enter <strong>in</strong>to dialogue withJan Mohammed Khan and Matiullah Khan who, <strong>in</strong> practical terms, still helda great deal of <strong>in</strong>formal power and resources with which they could obstructformal government officials <strong>in</strong> their activities. This was <strong>in</strong> direct contrast to<strong>ISAF</strong> and OEF partners <strong>in</strong> the area, who did cooperate with them, especiallyPage 55 of 133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!