13.07.2015 Views

Final evaluation Netherlands participation in ISAF 2006 - 2010

Final evaluation Netherlands participation in ISAF 2006 - 2010

Final evaluation Netherlands participation in ISAF 2006 - 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.1.2 Budget additions to regular Defence budgetThe HGIS facility ‘Conduct of crisis-management operations’ was the<strong>in</strong>strument for fund<strong>in</strong>g the deployment of the <strong>Netherlands</strong> armed forces aspart of <strong>ISAF</strong>. In addition, the deployment also affected spend<strong>in</strong>g from theregular Defence budget. On several occasions, extra funds were added tothe regular Defence budget. Because these expenses are stronglycorrelated to the deployment <strong>in</strong> Afghanistan, these budget additions are, forthe purposes of this <strong>evaluation</strong>, considered as form<strong>in</strong>g part of the total costof the deployment. S<strong>in</strong>ce the conclusion of the mission, the greater part ofthe acquired materiel has become part of the armed forces’ currentequipment.Overview of budget additions to the regular Defence budget as part of the <strong>participation</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>ISAF</strong>.DefencebudgetadditionHelicopterlosses<strong>2006</strong> 2007 2008 2009 <strong>2010</strong> 2011 Total30,000 50,000 25,000 105,000Van Geel funds 50,000 50,000 100,000Bos funds 50,00Acquisition ofBushmastersRestor<strong>in</strong>gOperationalRead<strong>in</strong>ess050,000100,00025,000 25,00030,000 30,000 60,000Total 55,000 50,000 105,000 80,000 50,00Amounts x 1,000050,000390,000Helicopter lossesIn <strong>2006</strong>, 2007 and 2008, the Balkenende II government added a total ofEUR 105 million to the regular Defence budget to compensate for the lossof helicopters <strong>in</strong> the preced<strong>in</strong>g years. This was done pursuant to the motionbrought by the Members of Parliament Voordew<strong>in</strong>d, Knops and Eijs<strong>in</strong>k. 32Dur<strong>in</strong>g operations <strong>in</strong> Afghanistan prior to <strong>2006</strong>, one Apache helicopter(2004) and two Ch<strong>in</strong>ook helicopters (2005) had been lost. The capacities <strong>in</strong>question could not be supplemented from the organisation’s own assets,nor could they be obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the market <strong>in</strong> the short term. It was,however, imperative for the armed forces to have these assets at theirdisposal as soon as possible. Two Ch<strong>in</strong>ooks were purchased <strong>in</strong> areplacement project (“4+2 Ch<strong>in</strong>ook expansion and re<strong>in</strong>forcement project”)to br<strong>in</strong>g the air fleet back to strength. The project is currently be<strong>in</strong>gimplemented and the new helicopters will be added to the exist<strong>in</strong>g air fleetfrom the end of 2011. Beside this specific addition to cover the loss of thehelicopters, the Voordew<strong>in</strong>d, Knops and Eijs<strong>in</strong>k motion also led to thedecision to complement the Defence budget with a structural sum of EUR25 million to cover future operational losses.Mission-specific capital <strong>in</strong>vestmentsFollow<strong>in</strong>g from its <strong>participation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>ISAF</strong>, the Defence organisation made anumber of additional <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> response to operational requirementsthat ensued from a changed concept of operations and the extensive wearand tear and loss of materiel. These <strong>in</strong>vestments concerned, <strong>in</strong>ter alia,equipment to improve the protection of deployed units, such as robots for32 Motion by Voordew<strong>in</strong>d, Knops and Eijs<strong>in</strong>k, Parliamentary Document 27925, no. 207.Page 86 of 133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!