A01.031.0.pdf

[im]peratori[s Titi Caesaris di]vi Vespasiani f. Augusti].
ROMAN PERSONAL NAMES IN CORINTHIA
22-25
Remarks: J. H. Kent, Corinth VIII. 3, indices, proposes both A[emi]lius and A[ure]lius; Oliver,
loc. cit., mentions both of these and adds A[rel]lius and A[vil]lius and restores the
cognomen [Paus]ania[s].
22. L(UCIUS) AEMILIUS RUI[- - -]
A. N. Skias, AE 1893, 114-115; CIL III. 2 Suppl., 13693 [1st c. B.C.(?)].
Corinth; block of calcar in second use, probably for a funerary inscription; for the text see L.
Valerius (COR 600) attested on the same inscription.
Remarks: Skias's (loc. cit.) suggestion that the inscription should be dated before Corinth's
foundation by Caesar in 44 B.C. seems improbable. For the name Aemilius, see
ACH 4-11.
23. M(ARCUS) AENIUS ONESIPHORUS
Corinth VIII. 3, 287,11. 1-2, pi. 25 [mid. 2nd c. A.D. (letter forms)].
Corinth, near Cheliotomylos in a Roman chamber tomb; thirteen fragments of a white marble
plaque; funerary dedication erected by the person for himself, his wife Calj[i]ana Hilara (COR
127), their son [M.] Aenius M. f. Aem(ilia) Onesiph[or]us (COR 24) and for their descendants:
V. M. Aenius I Onesiphorus sibi et I vivis Cal[[i]anae Hilarae I uxori et [M.] Aenio M. f. Aem. I
Onesiph[or]o f. posterisq. suis.
24. [M(ARCUS)] AENIUS M. F. AEM(ILIA) ONESIPH[OR]US
Corinth VIII. 3, 287,11. 4-5, pi. 25 [mid. 2nd c. A.D. (letter forms)].
Corinth, near Cheliotomylos in a Roman chamber tomb; thirteen fragments of a white marble
plaque; funerary dedication erected by his father M. Aenius Onesiphorus (COR 23, text) for
himself, his wife Call[i]ana Hilara (COR 127), for the person and for their descendants.
Remarks: Although the filiation and the tribe are lacking for his father, he was ascribed in the
local tribe Aemilia.
*25. M(ARCUS) (VIPSANIUS) AGRIPPA
Corinth VIII. 2, 16, ph. [16/15 B.C.]
Corinth, forum; blue marble block; inscription in his honour erected by the tribe Vinicia:
M. Agrippae cos. I tert. trib. potest., I d. d. tribus Vicinia I patrono.
Remarks: A. B. West, Corinth VIII. 2, 16 suggests that this inscription should have been one
of a series erected in Agrippa's honour according to a decree of the local senate by
each of the tribes of the city, probably during his visit in the winter of 17/16 B.C. For
253