A01.031.0.pdf

ROMAN PELOPONNESE I
122 B.C. (Broughton, Magistrates I, 516; Ill, 81-82), Cn. Domitius Cn. f. Cn. n.
Ahenobarbus (21), consul in 96 B.C. (Broughton, Magistrates II, 9; Ill, 82-83).
According to Kunze, op. cit., he was the consul of the year 122 B.C., Cn. Domitius
Ahenobarbus. L. Moretti, "Epigraphica5. Per la storia della lega achea", RFIC1965,
278-283 (cf. BullEpigr\966,2ì\; SEG25, 1971,466) identified him with another Cn.
Domitius Ahenobarbus, consul of the year 192 B.C. (F. Münzer, RE V 1 [1903]
1320-1321 [18]), grandfather of the younger homonymous consul, since according to
Paus. VI. 16, 9 ff. the leagues were revoked after 146 B.C. and were reconstituted on
an ethnic basis; the Gauls of the inscription are interpreted as Galli Boi.
Schwertfeger, op. cit., 30-38 (cf. BullEpigr 1976,282) argues for the date in 122 B.C.
(Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus: F. Münzer, RE V 1 [1903] 1322-1324 [20]), while
Semmlinger, op. cit., supports the date of Moretti in 192 B.C. On the basis of the
lettering, R. Kallet-Marx, "Quintus Fabius Maximus and the Dyme affair (Syll 3
684)", CQ45, 1995, 352-353 (SEG45, 1995, 409) excludes the date in 192 B.C. but
finds the identification of Domitius with the consul of 122 B.C. also "too easy", since
there are two more homonyms, who may have fought against the Gauls in 162 and
96 B.C., respectively F. Münzer, RE V 1 [1903] 1322 [19] and 1324-1327 [21].
*178. ΓΝΑΙΟΣ ΕΓΝΑΤΙΟΣ ΓΝΑΙΟΥ ΥΙΟΣ
[1] JvO 333 facsimile (SEG 17, 1960, 198) [100-72 B.C.].
Olympia; a fragment of a pedestal for a statue of the discussed person erected by the Achaean
Koinon and the Roman residents:
[To κοινόν τώ]ν 'Αχαιών και τών Ι ['Ρ(ομαίων οι ένγαιοΰντες] Ι [ΓναΙον Έγνά]τιον
Γναίου υίόν.
[2] JvO 938 facsimile + Ο/Β 6, 1958, 214-216, fig. 133 (AnnÉpigr 1960, 78; SEG 17, 1960, 197)
[100-72 B.C.].
Olympia; a pedestal for a statue erected for the named person by the Achaean Koinon and the
Roman residents:
To κοινόν τών "Αχαιών και Γ
Ρωμ[αί]ων τών ένγαιούντων ΓναΙον Έγνάτιον Γναίο[υ] υίόν.
Remarks: He is perhaps to be identified with the man cited by Cic, Clu. 135; see also F.
Münzer, RE V 2 (1905) 1993, s.v. Egnatius [2]; Broughton, Magistrates II, 490; Ill,
85; cf. R. Syme, "Missing senators", Historia 4, 1955, 6\=Roman papers I (Oxford
1979)280-281.
For the interpretation of 'Ρωμαίοι ένγαιούντες not merely as resident Romans, but
as Romans engaged in agriculture see S. Zoumbaki, Tyche 9, 1994, 213-218
(Α/7/7Ερ/£Γΐ994, 1610; SEG45, 1995,411).
179. Π(ΟΠΛΙΟΣ) ΕΓΝΑΤΙΟΣ ΒΡΑΧΥ[ΛΛΟΣ]
ΙνΟ 51,1. 2 facsimile [A.D. 126].
478