the gauteng spatial development framework - Gauteng Online

More documents

Recommendations

Info

THE TYPICAL PERFORMANCE DIMENSION OFA DEVELOPMENT CORRIDORIn a similar fashion to the modelling of a node, a typicalsection of development corridor was also modelled (FiguresA.2.6 and A.2.7). The morphological modelling establishesthe envisaged land-use activity mix, the floor area of eachof the activities (assuming full development), the typical rangeof building typologies, the percentage allocation of land area,estimation of mixed-use activity, residential typologies anddensities, establishing the estimated number of units. Thisyields the overall performance dimensions of the node (TableA.2.-iii).ANNEXURE A: THE 5 GIS-BASED MODELSTable A.2.7: Perspective model of a section of corridor95 GAUTENG SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2011 GAUTENG GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ha FAR du/ha dwellingsCorridor Land Area: 2,949.73 0.38 11,308,861 30.32 89,4242,949.73Gross FAR 0.38Gross Density 30.32 du/haPotential Population 286,158 @ 3.2 persons per unitFigure A.2.7: Perspective model of a section of corridorLand Area DistributionTotal Street Area 603.15 20%Parks & Open Space 411.67 14%Land Uses 1,934.92 66%Total 2,949.73 100%Floor Area Distribution FA % %Mixed Use Retail & Office 1,891,320 17%Mixed Use Residential & Office 568,037 5% 34%Mixed Use Activity Spine (Commercial & Res) 1,389,694 12%Medium Density Residential 2,657,936 24% 24%Lower Density Residential 1,156,051 10% 10%Commecial 1,827,692 16% 16%Industrial 1,818,130 16% 16%Total 11,308,861 100% 100%Table A.2-iii: The performance dimensions of an urban corridorANNEXURE A: THE 5 GIS-BASED MODELSGAUTENG SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2011GAUTENG GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY96
Page 1:
THE GAUTENG SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRA
Page 4 and 5:
TABLE OF CONTENTSSECTION 1: INTRODU
Page 6 and 7:
Table A.2-iv: Summary - Typical per
Page 8 and 9:
FIGURESSECTION 1: INTRODUCTIONFigur
Page 10 and 11:
Figure A.2.4: Modelling key compone
Page 12 and 13:
FOREWORD
Page 14 and 15:
SECTION1:Introduction
Page 16 and 17:
development framework around which
Page 18 and 19:
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTIONcadastral in
Page 20 and 21:
Not only does it seem necessary to
Page 22 and 23:
SECTION 2: THE GSDF AS A CONCEPTA S
Page 24 and 25:
disasters, shortages and changes in
Page 26 and 27:
are to promote sustainability, equi
Page 28 and 29:
It is legislated that metropolitan
Page 30 and 31:
Similarly, there must be a consiste
Page 32 and 33:
The corridors reflected in the figu
Page 34 and 35:
Similarly, in the United Kingdom, i
Page 36 and 37:
• urban compactness, also noted i
Page 38 and 39:
With Johannesburg as the city syste
Page 40 and 41:
Making sense of, and integrating, t
Page 42 and 43:
Based on this figure, it is suggest
Page 44 and 45:
On this basis, there is no reason w
Page 46 and 47:
SECTION 2: THE GSDF AS A CONCEPTPRI
Page 48 and 49:
SECTION 2: THE GSDF AS A CONCEPTPRI
Page 50 and 51:
SECTION3:The modelling elements of
Page 52 and 53:
value that goes with this can be de
Page 54 and 55:
THE MODELLING THAT UNDERPINS THE GS
Page 56 and 57:
MODEL 2: THE MORPHOLOGICAL MODELaro
Page 58 and 59: with lower levels of accessibility.
Page 60 and 61: MODEL 5: THE VIRTUAL MODEL ROOMSECT
Page 62 and 63: URBAN MANAGEMENT AND SPATIAL DEVELO
Page 64 and 65: making processes around these (for
Page 66 and 67: The intricacies of the urban struct
Page 68 and 69: SECTION 4: OUTCOMES OF APPLICATION:
Page 70 and 71: STEP SIX: URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MANAGE
Page 72 and 73: THE COMPOSITE SPATIAL STRUCTUREThe
Page 74 and 75: SECTION 4: OUTCOMES OF APPLICATION:
Page 76 and 77: FRAMEWORK FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF
Page 78 and 79: SECTION 5: FRAMEWORK FOR THE IMPLEM
Page 80 and 81: TRANSPORTATIONThe principles of urb
Page 82 and 83: URBAN STRUCTURING INITIATIVESSECTIO
Page 84 and 85: SECTION 5: FRAMEWORK FOR THE IMPLEM
Page 86 and 87: It is not enough, however, to simpl
Page 88 and 89: APPENDIXA.1: The urban profile mode
Page 90 and 91: ANNEXURE A: THE 5 GIS-BASED MODELSF
Page 92 and 93: THE IDENTIFICATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL
Page 94 and 95: ANNEXURE A: THE 5 GIS-BASED MODELSU
Page 96 and 97: DEFINING THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPONEN
Page 98 and 99: • Activity Spines, with a hierarc
Page 100 and 101: ANNEXURE A: THE 5 GIS-BASED MODELSN
Page 102 and 103: comprises specialised trade, such a
Page 104 and 105: • Development Intensity: Land are
Page 106 and 107: THE REGIONAL NODEDevelopment Yield:
Page 110 and 111: TYPICAL DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS: URB
Page 116 and 117: Figures A.2.13-15 show the same are
Page 120 and 121: THE CONNECTIVITY MODELANNEXURE A: T
Page 122 and 123: CONNECTIVITY MODEL 2This iteration
Page 124 and 125: CONNECTIVITY MODEL 4The fourth iter
Page 126 and 127: CONNECTIVITY MODEL 6The final itera
Page 128 and 129: THE BID-RENT MODELThe Bid-Rent Mode
Page 130 and 131: TOPOGRAPHIC SUITABILITYThe Topograp
Page 132 and 133: THE SPATIAL POLICY SUPPORT INDEXThe
Page 134 and 135: SURFACE CONSTRAINTSThe Surface Cons
Page 136 and 137: APPENDIXA.5Model 5 - the virtualmod
Page 138 and 139: TSHWANE STATIONS123Existing conditi
Page 140 and 141: APPENDIXB.1: Restrictingurban spraw
Page 142 and 143: urban edge, many of the municipal S
Page 144 and 145: ANNEXURE B: POLICY POSITION PAPERSF
Page 146 and 147: APPENDIXB.2: A densification policy
Page 148 and 149: The model that is to guide both res
Page 150 and 151: APPENDIXB.3: Harmonisinghousingprov
Page 152 and 153: housing and mixed-uses can be reali
Page 158 and 159:
THE PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE TRANSP
Page 160 and 161:
ANNEXURE B: POLICY POSITION PAPERSi
Page 162 and 163:
Possible outer extentsof urban deve
Page 164 and 165:
APPENDIXB.5: Thecase principles ofs
Page 166 and 167:
sustainable and efficient. A long-t
Page 168 and 169:
ANNEXURE B: POLICY POSITION PAPERSB
Page 170 and 171:
APPENDIXC.1: Thefreight and logisti
Page 172 and 173:
overall platform on which more focu
Page 174 and 175:
A further south-eastern regional hu
Page 176 and 177:
ANNEXURE C: POLICY PERSPECTIVESFigu
Page 178 and 179:
APPENDIXC.2: A perspective guidingt
Page 180 and 181:
anges of hills or mountains, whethe
Page 182 and 183:
APPENDIXC.3: Preservationof landhav
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
URBAN CONSOLIDATION ZONESThe physic
Page 188 and 189:
APPENDIXC.5: Indicativepatterns ofe
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
APPENDIXC.6: Integrationof the rura
Page 196 and 197:
opportunity that goes with being ab
Page 198 and 199:
ANNEXURED: The package of plans
Page 200 and 201:
In order to achieve spatial integri
Page 202 and 203:
LEVEL ESSENTIAL FOCUS AND SCOPE SCA
Page 204 and 205:
LEVEL ESSENTIAL FOCUS AND SCOPE SCA
Page 206 and 207:
ANNEXUREE: Glossary of terms
Page 208 and 209:
Brownfield Land and SitesPreviously
Page 210 and 211:
ANNEXURE E: GLOSSARY OF TERMSTown -
Page 212 and 213:
Development ManagementThe process w
Page 214 and 215:
Geographic Spread Programme (DTI)Th
Page 216 and 217:
ANNEXURE E: GLOSSARY OF TERMSIntegr
Page 218 and 219:
ANNEXURE E: GLOSSARY OF TERMSSpatia
Page 220 and 221:
ANNEXURE E: GLOSSARY OF TERMSUrban
Page 222:
ANNEXURE E: GLOSSARY OF TERMS• Ur
show all

the gauteng spatial development framework - Gauteng Online

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?