13.07.2015 Views

the gauteng spatial development framework - Gauteng Online

the gauteng spatial development framework - Gauteng Online

the gauteng spatial development framework - Gauteng Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HOUSINGIt is important that <strong>the</strong> GSDF takes a position on two housing related issues: <strong>the</strong> presentapproach to public housing delivery and <strong>the</strong> pressure this places on <strong>the</strong> GCR's urban structureand infrastructure cost; and <strong>the</strong> 'leap-frog' effect of private 'lifestyle residential estates'beyond <strong>the</strong> fringes of <strong>the</strong> urban extent; both fundamental threats to a sustainable urbanstructure.Both <strong>the</strong> way in which public, subsidised housing is delivered and lifestyle residential estatesfulfil a market demand, have demonstrably negative effects on <strong>the</strong> policy of urbancontainment. Both issues need to be addressed since present policies and trends in thisregard are fundamentally at odds with <strong>the</strong> transformation required in <strong>the</strong> GCR's urbanstructure and <strong>the</strong> approach to growth on which <strong>the</strong> GSDF is based.It is recommended that an integrated planning review be undertaken to determine howpublic housing delivery, on <strong>the</strong> one hand, and policies regulating <strong>the</strong> proliferation of'standalone', low density residential estates, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, can be re- directed to complywith <strong>the</strong> principles underpinning <strong>the</strong> GSDF. It is within this perspective that <strong>the</strong> followingview on housing is set out.It is clear that <strong>the</strong> provision of state and provincially subsidised housing for first-time homeowners who qualify for <strong>the</strong> once-off housing subsidy is accountable for a substantial amountof pressure to extend beyond <strong>the</strong> existing urban extent to peripheral areas, causing unwantedhorizontal sprawl. No doubt various factors have combined to focus housing delivery inthis way, inter alia,(a) <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong> relatively lower cost of land in <strong>the</strong>se peripheral areas makes<strong>the</strong> land component of housing delivery more affordable;(b) <strong>the</strong> assembly of extensive tracts of land at scale is possibly more easily achieved in<strong>the</strong>se peripheral zones; and(c) <strong>the</strong> land in <strong>the</strong>se areas may be politically less contested than in areas more embeddedin <strong>the</strong> urban system where <strong>the</strong> 'not-in-my-back-yard' (NIMBY) syndrome is likely to bemore prevalent.Inevitably, however, one must consider(a) how to integrate public housing initiatives into <strong>the</strong> mainstream of <strong>the</strong> urban systemand, more importantly,(b) make public housing an integral part of urban <strong>development</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r than a blindobjective in its own right. It is clear that <strong>the</strong> focus on public housing delivery, undera system of subsidy that increasingly manifests flaws, is leading to a single-mindednessof approach that is nei<strong>the</strong>r good for <strong>the</strong> urban system nor <strong>the</strong> recipients of such housing.Too many people, who can least afford it, are displaced to <strong>the</strong> urban periphery orbeyond and are unable to access opportunities (economic, social,educational);similarly, <strong>the</strong> urban system is unable to afford <strong>the</strong>m, in a sustainable way, withincreasing amounts being spent on transport subsidies and infrastructural investmenthaving little or no return.It is <strong>the</strong> intention to fundamentally redirect public housing as a provincial strategy in <strong>Gauteng</strong>so as to align it far more significantly with urban structure and sustainability. The next threeyears must see significant movement in this respect and provincial leadership, on behalf of<strong>the</strong> most important sub-continental conurbation, must carry <strong>the</strong> debate with CentralGovernment. This view has been presented to <strong>the</strong> provincial housing department and itshould be prepared to take <strong>the</strong> debate fur<strong>the</strong>r. Several alternative <strong>spatial</strong> models have beenput forward in <strong>the</strong> GSDF and <strong>the</strong>se approaches must receive more detailed attention.The proliferation of affluent, low-density residential estates beyond <strong>the</strong> urban fringe is alsoat odds with <strong>the</strong> <strong>spatial</strong> compaction intentions of <strong>the</strong> GSDF. Review of this practice, in linewith <strong>the</strong> policy position paper in this regard in Annexure B, is required. Although <strong>the</strong> UrbanEdge Delineation Policy has recently been repealed, <strong>the</strong> approval of <strong>the</strong>se projects over <strong>the</strong>past nine years, notwithstanding clear policy guidelines in terms of <strong>the</strong> Urban Edge delineation,is cause for concern as this has impacted on <strong>the</strong> sustainability of <strong>the</strong> GCR.SECTION 5: FRAMEWORK FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GSDFGAUTENG SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2011GAUTENG GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!