13.07.2015 Views

the gauteng spatial development framework - Gauteng Online

the gauteng spatial development framework - Gauteng Online

the gauteng spatial development framework - Gauteng Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANNEXURE A: THE 5 GIS-BASED MODELSUrban structure refers to <strong>the</strong> physical form in which <strong>the</strong> urban system is manifested and<strong>the</strong> relationships existing between <strong>the</strong> component parts that make up this physical urbanform. It encompasses <strong>the</strong> pattern or arrangement of <strong>development</strong> blocks and land parcels,<strong>the</strong> public space areas, <strong>the</strong> movement systems and streets, <strong>the</strong> buildings and built form,<strong>the</strong> open space, natural environment and landscape, and <strong>the</strong> associated service infrastructure.The resultant urban form is <strong>the</strong> <strong>spatial</strong> manifestation of <strong>the</strong> complex interaction of <strong>the</strong>aforementioned urban processes and systems, and <strong>the</strong> human activity associated with <strong>the</strong>se.The urban structure approach provides <strong>the</strong> foundations for <strong>the</strong> establishment of a <strong>development</strong>direction and design of <strong>the</strong> constituent elements. It enables <strong>the</strong> creation of a coherent<strong>framework</strong>, which forms <strong>the</strong> basis for future <strong>development</strong> and <strong>the</strong> decision-making processesaround it (i.e. policy, resources, socio-economic), by a diversity of actors, in order to achieve<strong>the</strong> following:• Integration, i.e. connection and overlap;• Functional efficiency, so that individual elements work toge<strong>the</strong>r as a whole;• Environmental harmony, creating <strong>development</strong> processes and forms that areenvironmentally sustainable;• A sense of place, creating a place that is recognisably distinct, streng<strong>the</strong>ns localidentity, and simultaneously plays its role within <strong>the</strong> wider urban system; and• Socio-economically sustainable, is viable, enabling economic growth andexpansion and supports all social activities and <strong>the</strong> <strong>development</strong> of its communities.THE URBAN SYSTEM: AN INTERWOVEN SET OFMORPHOLOGICAL ELEMENTSThe morphological model recognises that <strong>the</strong> urban system is structured into a pattern withuneven <strong>development</strong> intensities, varying concentrations of activity, a diverse mix of activitiesfrom mono-use to intense mixed (even conflicting uses at times) and diverse residentialdensities from low density sub-urban sprawl to high density high-rise apartment clusters.The current urban pattern still reflects <strong>the</strong> 'apar<strong>the</strong>id city structure' of each of <strong>the</strong> metropolitanareas that comprise <strong>the</strong> province. The latter is aptly described in <strong>the</strong> City of Johannesburg'sGrowth and Development Strategy (2006):“The logic of apar<strong>the</strong>id was to keep people of different races apart physically. Thisimpacted negatively on <strong>the</strong> efficient form and design of <strong>the</strong> city. In its pathologicalcommitment to keep people of different races separate, apar<strong>the</strong>id spread <strong>the</strong> city out,laying <strong>the</strong> foundations for a low density residential and retail-strip sprawl. Thiswould reproduce itself over time, especially through <strong>the</strong> self-reinforcing effect ofprivate vehicle-based transport to wealthier suburban <strong>development</strong>s on <strong>the</strong> outskirts,and an irrationally designed public transport system that <strong>the</strong>n could never reachviability because of <strong>the</strong> lack of population density (and in turn usage) onany routes.Apar<strong>the</strong>id created sweeping dormitory townships which had limited functionalityexcept to house a (hopefully temporary) labour force, and which were deliberatelylocated far from any real opportunities for shopping or entertainment. As <strong>the</strong> economyrestructured with <strong>the</strong>decline of mining and manufacturing and <strong>the</strong> rise in importance of services, <strong>the</strong>primary location of economic activity also shifted to those parts of <strong>the</strong> city with adjacenthigh-amenity residential areas where <strong>the</strong> necessary skills and buying power wereconcentrated. This increased <strong>the</strong> distance between dormitory townships and jobs. Itadded worsening locational disadvantage to <strong>the</strong> burdens of that part of <strong>the</strong> populationalready more vulnerable as a result of employment decline in <strong>the</strong> primary andsecondary sectors of <strong>the</strong> economy.Over <strong>the</strong> past decade, some progress has been made in re-integrating <strong>the</strong> city <strong>spatial</strong>ly,both in terms of where people can locate, and how easy it is for <strong>the</strong>m to movearound to jobs or places to shop. Despite this progress <strong>the</strong>re is still a long wayto go. Worryingly, settlement <strong>development</strong> to accommodate fast population andhousehold growth has often been on <strong>the</strong> edges of <strong>the</strong> city, reinforcing apar<strong>the</strong>idpatterns and worsening locational disadvantage”.81 GAUTENG SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2011 GAUTENG GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!