13.07.2015 Views

the gauteng spatial development framework - Gauteng Online

the gauteng spatial development framework - Gauteng Online

the gauteng spatial development framework - Gauteng Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The very significant and bold investment into <strong>the</strong> Gautrain system has yet to work its logicon <strong>the</strong> urban system and <strong>the</strong>re will no doubt be considerable relief on affected corridorsas this expanded bus and rail system takes effect.The reality, however, is that <strong>the</strong> SANRAL and Gautrain initiatives notwithstanding, (a) amega-city cannot be made to function with private mobility as its primary form of movement;(b) access to opportunity for <strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong> urban constituency cannot be satisfied bymerely implementing <strong>the</strong> GSRN road network; (c) <strong>the</strong> shape and form of <strong>the</strong> GSRN roadnetwork, regardless of <strong>the</strong> form it takes in terms of public transport systems that might beretro-fitted within its logic, may be at odds with <strong>the</strong> compact, complex transformed urbanstructure now proposed as <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> GCR's growth; and (d) a mega-city must bemade to rely not only on public transport but also, more importantly, on a mass transitsystem served by and integrated with a variety of o<strong>the</strong>r public transport systems.PRASA <strong>the</strong> nucleus of <strong>the</strong> overall integrated public transport system and authority. Theintention is, as far as possible, to structure <strong>the</strong> GCR in such a way so as to:• Reduce <strong>the</strong> need for commuting (greater integration of place of work and place ofresidence);• Make real alternatives available, at more localised levels, for non-motorised transport(walking and cycling);• Make passenger rail mass transit <strong>the</strong> backbone of <strong>the</strong> commuting system for <strong>the</strong> cityregion;• Integrate bus and taxi with <strong>the</strong> passenger rail system;There is a determination to base <strong>the</strong> growth of <strong>the</strong> GCR on sustainable, affordable, safe,convenient, integrated public transport. This commitment to public transport must becentral, and shared by all stakeholders, agencies and disciplines. Private mobility is to takeits place within <strong>the</strong> wider logics of public transport of passengers and a freight and logisticsstrategy. Not only is <strong>the</strong> urban structure to be predicated on public transport, <strong>the</strong>re is acommitment to a public transport system based on mass transportation as <strong>the</strong> primaryelement, namely passenger rail, supported by dedicated Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), secondaryand tertiary bus routes and with taxis forming <strong>the</strong> lower order, short-haul, localshuttle services. The GCR cannot cope into <strong>the</strong> future as one of <strong>the</strong> world's mega-cities withoutmass rail transit as its basis.<strong>Gauteng</strong> has an extremely comprehensive and complex passenger rail network that hasbeen allowed to take secondary status over years of investment into more road-basedtransportation. PRASA, as <strong>the</strong> passenger rail authority, has <strong>the</strong> renewed commitment to reinvestmentin an aged inventory of rolling stock, modernisation and fur<strong>the</strong>r integrationof <strong>the</strong> overall system, re-positioning its services as <strong>the</strong> primary passenger mover, improvingits levels of affordability and quality, coverage and accessibility, convenience, frequency and,above all, safety. At <strong>the</strong> core of <strong>the</strong> urban structure for <strong>the</strong> GCR, <strong>the</strong>re must be <strong>the</strong> recommitmentby all stakeholders to this primary role performed by PRASA and to make• Use BRT as shapers of urban structure and form (Curitiba refers) and paralleling <strong>the</strong>sewith passenger rail only where rail capacity cannot sensibly be increased;• Use taxi movement for more localised distribution or on routes not sensibly served byhigher-order public transport systems;• Create more capacity and right-of-way for high-occupancy vehicles on <strong>the</strong> major roadnetwork;• Optimise <strong>the</strong> role and functionality of <strong>the</strong> existing and future network to be responsiveto <strong>the</strong> focus on public transport in <strong>the</strong> region;• In respect of <strong>the</strong> urban structure of <strong>the</strong> GCR, public transport is to be a primaryshaper of urban form and policy and a basis for directing intensity, use and form ofnew <strong>development</strong> and <strong>the</strong> intensification and complexity to be added to existingpatterns of <strong>development</strong>; and• Urban <strong>development</strong> initiatives, whe<strong>the</strong>r private or public, must specifically demonstrate(a) how <strong>the</strong>y are to be served by public transport; (b) how <strong>the</strong>y are fur<strong>the</strong>ring <strong>the</strong>ANNEXURE B: POLICY POSITION PAPERSGAUTENG SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2011GAUTENG GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!