04.12.2012 Views

Racism - A Short History - George M Fredrickson.pdf - WNLibrary

Racism - A Short History - George M Fredrickson.pdf - WNLibrary

Racism - A Short History - George M Fredrickson.pdf - WNLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NOTES to Pages 41–55<br />

46. The analogy to the Nazis is made by Netanyahu in Origins<br />

and by Yerushalmi in Assimilation and Racial Anti-Semitism.<br />

Both, however, give some weight to the difference between<br />

religiously based and secular constructions of innate Jewish<br />

difference.<br />

47. Poliakov, <strong>History</strong> of Anti-Semitism, 2:230–231.<br />

48. Quoted in Mörner, Race Mixture, 55–56.<br />

49. See Thornton, Africa and Africans, 269–271.<br />

50. See <strong>George</strong> M. <strong>Fredrickson</strong>, White Supremacy: A Comparative<br />

Study in American and South African <strong>History</strong> (New York,<br />

1981), 73.<br />

51. See references in nn. 24 and 43 above.<br />

52. On the confusion surrounding the Curse of Ham in the<br />

late medieval and early modern periods, see Benjamin Braude,<br />

“The Sons of Noah and the Construction of Ethnic and Geographical<br />

Identities in the Medieval and Early Modern Periods,” William<br />

and Mary Quarterly 54 (1997): 103–142. On the uses of the curse to<br />

justify radical status inequality within Europe, see Paul Freedman,<br />

Images of the Medieval Peasant (Stanford, 1999), 86–104.<br />

53. Sanders, Lost Tribes, 62.<br />

54. Benjamin Braude, “Race and Sex: What Happened to<br />

Cross-Color Generation in the Eighteenth Century?” (paper presented<br />

to the Conference on Sexuality in Early America, Philadelphia,<br />

June 1–3, 2001), 17–18.<br />

55. See Thomas Virgil Peterson, Ham and Japheth: The Mythic<br />

World of Whites in the Antebellum South (Metuchen, N.J., 1978).<br />

Blackburn, in New World Slavery (72–73), criticizes David Brion<br />

Davis for contending that the Curse of Ham had little importance<br />

as a justification of slavery before the late eighteenth and nineteenth<br />

centuries (Slavery and Human Progress [New York, 1984], 337<br />

n. 144). In my view the curse was not securely linked to the polemical<br />

defense of slavery until it became an alternative rationale<br />

for southerners who resisted scientific racism on fundamentalist religious<br />

grounds.<br />

56. I have described this transition elsewhere. See “Social Origins<br />

of American <strong>Racism</strong>,” in The Arrogance of Race: Historical Per-<br />

176

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!