08.08.2015 Views

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Despite his suffering because of bigotry, in church matters Komensky retainedan eirenical and ecumenical spirit which comes out very strongly in his workPanorthosia 59 (‘Universal Reform’). In religious disputes he developed hisprinciple of ‘Both-Nei<strong>the</strong>r’: both sides have acceptance; nei<strong>the</strong>r side dominates<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. He laid down three rules for settling disputes:• Universality. <strong>The</strong> principle here is that in all opinions <strong>the</strong>re issomething that is universally accepted as true.• Simplicity. Here Komensky quotes St Hilary: ‘God poses no subtlequestions when he invites us into heaven.’• Agreement. We should look to make some concession to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rpoint of view.Komensky tried to show how his ‘both-nei<strong>the</strong>r’ principle could be applied tosome of <strong>the</strong> thorny questions of dispute in his day:• <strong>The</strong> dispute over <strong>the</strong> filioque clause. Both Western and Eastern pointsof view are acceptable. <strong>The</strong> Holy Spirit flows from <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, ‘<strong>the</strong> oneoutflow of everything’, through <strong>the</strong> Son.• God’s foreknowledge. Is it <strong>the</strong> cause of things to come or not? We cansay ‘nei<strong>the</strong>r’ because with God all things are now, yet we could alsoargue ‘both’, that is, God knew beforehand what would come to passand made it come to pass. Both are true.• Justification. Is this a passive, imputed righteousness by faith (<strong>the</strong>Reformed tradition), or an active, imparted righteousness by faith (<strong>the</strong>Catholic position)? Both, says Komensky, are true. We are justified byworks and by faith, Scripture tells us this. He writes: ‘It is pointless toreiterate <strong>the</strong> question whe<strong>the</strong>r we are justified by faith or works. For<strong>the</strong> answer must be “by both”, since <strong>the</strong> Scripture expressly confirmsboth of <strong>the</strong>m.’ We have to grasp <strong>the</strong> righteousness of Christ as ourpriest (justification by faith – Paul) and we have to maintain a closeimitation of his holy life (justification by works – James); fur<strong>the</strong>r, weenter into <strong>the</strong> essential righteousness of God by becoming partakers of<strong>the</strong> divine nature (2 Peter 1.4).59Komensky, Jan Amos, Panorthosia or Universal Reform (1645), translation by Dobbie, AM O, Sheffield Academic Press, 1995, Ch 1-18 and 27, p 129ff.Page 97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!