08.08.2015 Views

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of God may be complete, equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3.16-17).’ 193<strong>The</strong> Orthodox Church, likewise, claims to have Scripture as its foundation forfaith and practice, but, with <strong>the</strong> Catholic Church, claims also that <strong>the</strong> Church,through ‘tradition,’ has faithfully interpreted <strong>the</strong> Scriptures throughout itshistory. Timothy (Kallistos) Ware writes:‘<strong>The</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> Church is a Scriptural Church: Orthodoxy believes this just asfirmly, if not more firmly, than Protestantism. <strong>The</strong> Bible is <strong>the</strong> supremeexpression of God’s revelation to man, and <strong>Christian</strong>s must always be“People of <strong>the</strong> Book.” But if <strong>Christian</strong>s are People of <strong>the</strong> Book, <strong>the</strong> Bible is<strong>the</strong> Book of <strong>the</strong> People; it must not be regarded as something set up over<strong>the</strong> Church, but as something that lives and is understood within <strong>the</strong>Church (that is why one should not separate Scripture and tradition).’ 194Most Protestants are uneasy about <strong>the</strong> concept of tradition being placedalongside <strong>the</strong> Scriptures, but even Protestantism finds it hard to do away withtradition. I know Protestants who would claim that <strong>the</strong>y abide by <strong>the</strong>Reformation principle of ‘sola scriptura‘ but are firmly rooted in a Calvinist orAnabaptist tradition and interpret <strong>the</strong> scriptures with <strong>the</strong> help of a body ofwritings holding <strong>the</strong>ir viewpoint almost exclusively. Equally, few liberalProtestants can escape a ‘tradition’ in <strong>the</strong>ir handling of Scripture and manyhave a demythologising tradition which treats <strong>the</strong> texts in a ‘non-realist’ way.How <strong>the</strong>n can we tell which ‘tradition’ is acceptable? I suggest that if atradition is consistent with <strong>the</strong> plain meaning of <strong>the</strong> Creeds, and so upliftsChrist as Saviour, Lord and God, and coheres with a doctrine of <strong>the</strong> Trinity, itis acceptable. Protestants will say that <strong>the</strong> Catholic tradition teaches morethan <strong>the</strong> bare text of <strong>the</strong> Creeds and will find that hard to cope with, but atleast it can be held that none of <strong>the</strong>ir traditions undermine <strong>the</strong> Creeds. That iswhy adherence to <strong>the</strong> classical Creeds is so important for <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Unity</strong>.When a tradition parts company with <strong>the</strong> Creeds, <strong>the</strong>n we must partcompany with that tradition.193Ed Flannery, Austin, OP, Vatican Collection Vol 1, Vatican Council II, <strong>The</strong> Conciliar andPost-Conciliar Documents, New Revised Edition 1992, (ninth printing) DominicanPublications, pp 757.194Ware, Timothy, <strong>The</strong> Orthodox Church, Penguin Books, 1967, p207.Page 206

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!