08.08.2015 Views

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Probably <strong>the</strong> most earnest of <strong>the</strong> Reformers for unity was Martin Bucer(Butzer) (1491-1551) of Strasbourg, who tried to mediate between <strong>the</strong> Swiss<strong>the</strong>ologians and Lu<strong>the</strong>rans. Lu<strong>the</strong>r tended to distrust <strong>the</strong> Swiss; he differedstrongly from <strong>the</strong>m on <strong>the</strong> doctrine of <strong>the</strong> Eucharist, insisting on a ‘realpresence of Christ’ in <strong>the</strong> elements. Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s basis of unity, even among fellowProtestants, was truth (and truth as Lu<strong>the</strong>r saw it) ra<strong>the</strong>r than a yielding ofconviction for <strong>the</strong> sake of conciliation.Soon after Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s initial protest against Rome in 1517, reformed Swiss<strong>the</strong>ologians such as Zwingli and Oecolampadius and German <strong>the</strong>ologians suchas Melanchthon, Bucer and Osiander found <strong>the</strong>mselves drawn, with Lu<strong>the</strong>r, toa Colloquy to be held in Philip of Hesse’s castle in Marburg in 1529. It onlylasted two days. <strong>The</strong> point of it all was to see how much <strong>the</strong>se ‘Protestant’scholars could agree.After lively discussions <strong>the</strong>y found <strong>the</strong>y could agree on 14 of 15 proposals ondoctrine. Many of <strong>the</strong>se, such as that on <strong>the</strong> Trinity, were universal doctrinesagreed by Catholics and Protestants alike, but it was on <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong>Eucharist that <strong>the</strong>re was deep disagreement between Lu<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong> Swiss.Lu<strong>the</strong>r had gone to <strong>the</strong> Conference only reluctantly as he was sure <strong>the</strong> Swissview was heretical and that <strong>the</strong>y would not change <strong>the</strong>ir minds.<strong>The</strong> issue was, is <strong>the</strong> body and blood of Christ really present in <strong>the</strong> elements of<strong>the</strong> Eucharist? Lu<strong>the</strong>r was adamant that Jesus’ words, ‘This is my body,’ mustbe taken at face value as literally true. Zwingli made <strong>the</strong> plea to Lu<strong>the</strong>r that thismust be taken figuratively, and called for a distinguishing between essentialdoctrines and non-essential ones. To Lu<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> question of <strong>the</strong> corporealpresence of Christ in <strong>the</strong> Supper was an essential matter, not a non-essential.<strong>The</strong>y parted agreeing to differ and not to use bitter words against each o<strong>the</strong>r.<strong>The</strong> whole debate over ‘essentials’ and ‘non-essentials’ is ongoing and islargely a Protestant problem. <strong>The</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> two is resolvedmuch more clearly by <strong>the</strong> Catholics (for whom it lies in accepting <strong>the</strong> traditionof <strong>the</strong> infallible teaching ministry of <strong>the</strong> church) and by <strong>the</strong> Orthodox (forwhom it lies in <strong>the</strong> teaching of <strong>the</strong> seven Ecumenical Councils of <strong>the</strong> universalChurch).What seems to be happening today is that very many <strong>Christian</strong>s are seeingthat <strong>the</strong>re are a few core truths that are true for all true <strong>Christian</strong>s which aresufficient to provide grounds for unity, while allowing <strong>the</strong>m to hold on toPage 67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!