Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community
Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community
Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
credo-baptists to accept <strong>the</strong> provisional nature of infant baptism as a validform of baptism if done in <strong>the</strong> name of <strong>the</strong> Trinity.Roman Catholic participation in Alpha Courses indicates an acceptance of <strong>the</strong>need for a subsequent ‘conversion‘ experience in <strong>the</strong> lives of people who havebeen baptised as infants. <strong>The</strong> common response of some Catholics to <strong>the</strong>irneed for a personal conversion to Christ, that <strong>the</strong>y have no need of it as <strong>the</strong>ywere baptized as <strong>Christian</strong>s in infancy, may be getting less common.<strong>The</strong> ‘Lima‘ text also considered <strong>the</strong> Eucharist and <strong>the</strong> Ministry and, as in <strong>the</strong>case of its treatment of Baptism, tried to summarize <strong>the</strong> viewpoints of major<strong>Christian</strong> traditions on <strong>the</strong>se aspects of faith. <strong>The</strong> purpose of <strong>the</strong> documentseems to have been simply to get <strong>Christian</strong>s to think about points of viewtaken by traditions o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong>ir own. This has been <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> recentseries of ARCIC discussions.After all <strong>the</strong> discussions, <strong>the</strong>re is little evidence of any of <strong>the</strong> traditions makingradical moves to give up long-held doctrinal positions, but an understanding ofeach o<strong>the</strong>r’s views and an awareness that much is held in common have comeabout.In 1992 a group of Evangelicals made a response to Baptism, Eucharist andMinistry, which had been published in 1982. 134 <strong>The</strong> response shows quiteclearly that Evangelicals can face up to views o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong>ir own withcourtesy and humility, but equally that <strong>the</strong>re are areas which are basicallyirreconcilable with <strong>the</strong> views of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r traditions. <strong>The</strong> Conclusion to <strong>the</strong>Evangelicals’ response states that <strong>the</strong>re are two areas that must be held fast byEvangelicals: <strong>the</strong> supremacy of Scripture over tradition and a nonsacramentalistunderstanding of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> faith. 135 It needs to be added,however, that all true <strong>Christian</strong>ity is sacramental to some degree. Evangelicalsneed to be reminded that <strong>the</strong>y have <strong>the</strong> sacrament of <strong>the</strong> preached Wordwhen Christ is brought to <strong>the</strong>ir hearts.It is essential if <strong>Unity</strong> is to be real and not coerced that each tradition shouldhold to its own distinctive views (often won at great cost in <strong>the</strong> past) and also134<strong>The</strong> text of <strong>the</strong> Lima Report with an Evangelical Response, Ed Schrotenboer, Paul, WorldEvangelical Fellowship, <strong>The</strong> Paternoster Press, 1992.135<strong>The</strong> text of <strong>the</strong> Lima Report with an Evangelical Response, Ed Schrotenboer, Paul, WorldEvangelical Fellowship, <strong>The</strong> Paternoster Press, 1992, p 19ff.Page 152